✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 19 Nov 2007

P.Bhaskar & Anr. v. A.P. State Election Commission, Rep., by the State Election Commissioner, M.G.Road, Secunderabad

Writ Petition No. 24338 of 2007C V NAGARJUNA REDDY

Case at a glance

Order date
19 Nov 2007
Bench
C V NAGARJUNA REDDY

Outcome

Withdrawn

counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Judgment

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24338 of 2007

Operative part

O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:

To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering our applications to revise the electoral roles by including our names, among others, and by deleting the names of persons who have died or otherwise not residing within territorial limits of Ward No.26 of Chittoor Municipality, and in not following the mandatory procedure laid down under the representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965, as well as the A.P. Municipalities and Nagar Panchayats (Preparation and Publication of Electoral Rolls) Rules, 2001, notwithstanding the petitioners’ numerous representations as being illegal, arbitrary, voilative of the Constitution and statutory provisions as to our right to vote and to contest the elections and consequently direct the respondents to rectify the voters list before conducting the elections to the Ward No.26 of Chittoor Municipality and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper.

Smt. P.Padmavathi, learned counsel representing Sri D.Seshadri Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Since the writ petition is yet to be admitted, the request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date: 19-11-2007 KLP

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Representation of the People Act, 1951; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965; Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 19 Nov 2007. The bench was C V NAGARJUNA REDDY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 24338 of 2007). ← Search more judgments