High Court · 2025

P Venkat Reddy, Aged about 49 years, Occ. o.l-67, Tattiannram Viltage, H;r;in;ij;"ffi;;: Smt. P. lManemma. Wo p.B-uchi Reddy, Aged about 64 years. Occ. R/o. H.No.1-33. rattianna'ra",iVirridBlirrvrtnasar Mandat, R.R. 6pJ,i::lr*, ^Sri ...PETITIONERS *i"'#::Bi'8lfllXififu 5,ff 8,,:ii:'t%??l3i3li,fi I;"?"li#mentof The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hayatnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District. Tahsildar, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Smt. Razia Beoum. Wio. IMohd Arif .Ul Haq, D/o. Late Mohammed Ghouse. fl'g:'-*:Hl€:J3?,13io* Housewite' nvJ. 7r0, Ew;, acHEiC;r"il, "'"' 3 AND

1. 2 3 4 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the'affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue, writ, ord". or Direction more particurarry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 and 3 authorities in trying to dispossess the petitioners from peacefur possession and enjoyment over the agricurture rand admeasuring Ac.2-10 Gts., in Sy.No.26lEE and Ac.2-10 Gts., in Sy.No.26lRU, total admeasu ring Ac.4_2O Gts., situated at Tatiikana, Tattiannaram Virage, Hayatnagar Mandar, R.R. District, as iregar, -7 arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice, against provisions of New ROR Act, 2O2O and also against Article 14 and 300-A of the constitution of lndia and against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment over the agriculture land admeasuring Ac.2-'10 Gts., in Sy.No.26lEE and Ac.2-'10 Gts., in Sy.No.26/RU, total admeasuring Ac.4-20 Gts.' situated at Tatiikana, Tattiannaram village, Hayatnagar Mandal, R.R District. IA NO: 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 & 3 not to dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment over the agriculture land admeasuring Ac.2-1O Gts., in Sy.No.26lEE and Ac.2-10 Gts., in Sy.No.26lRU, total admeasuring Ac.4-20 Gts., situated at Tatiikana, Tattiannaram village' Hayatnagar Mandal, R.R. District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI AKKAM ESHWAR Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER - THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI{AR REDDY WRIT PETI TION No.1814 5 of2O25 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking following relief: t "...to issue a Wit, Order or Direction more parttcularlg one in the natu-re of Wnt of Mandamus declaing the actioi of the Respondents Nos-2 and 3 authorities in tfuing r; ;;;;r, l"- o"!!g"ey.t frrm. peacefut possession aitd"enjoy^int ;;", rhe agnculture lqnd admeasuring Ac.2. tb - Gts., in Su.No.26/EE qnd Ac.2. jo Gts., i7 Sg.No.2a/Ri'totat admeasuing Ac.4.20 Gls., situated at Ta.tiik<tnct, T,attionnaram Village, HaAatnqgar Mandal, R. R. Disancr czs illegal, arbirary in uiolatton oj pinciples ,urni" "y against prouisions of New ROR Act iOzo ira ir_iir, Article 1.4 lnd 3OOA of the Constitution o1 nai" i"a 7i,"rt all settled pinciples oJ laLU and .onslqr"nttg' ;;r;;';;" respondents No.2 and 3 not to disposse", tn p"iti"i.i- yroin their peaceful possesslon and enjogment ouei the ogA"iUir. lqnd admeqsuing Ac.2.10 G*., in Sg w" ZAI eA" ani')|,.. 2.10 Gts., in Sy.No.26/R{J totql ctd.mJa.suri"g a7.+.io*A't;, yituqted at Tatiikana, Tattionnaram utttagZ, Uoyin;gn, MandaL R. R. Distict... " n iri "l"o

2. It is stated that father of the petitioners was assigned agricul[ure land admeasuring Ac.2.10 Gts., in Sy.No.26/EE and Ac\.?. 10 Gts., in Sy.No.26/RU, total admeasuring Ac.4.2O Gts., situated at Tatiikana, Tattiannaram Village, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is further stated that after the death of petitioners, lather, they succecded the said property and their names were mutated in the pahanies for the years 7992-93, 1995_96,7998_gg, tggg_2ooo, 2003-2004, 2007_08, 20008-09, 2O11-12, 2O74-tS, t42O fasti, 1422 fasli and in the 1-B proceedings dated 13.06.2072 arld thev were also issued pattadar .--I 2 CVBR, J W.P.No.18145 of 2025 passbooks vide Nos.T0501O0300O8, T05010030001 and TO50 1 O0300OO5 resPectivelY.

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that their agricultural land forms part of Sy.No.26/E-E and Sy.No.26/RU but the respondents claiming that the subject'la'nds forms part of land in LGC No.73 of 2OO 1 , dated O4.O7 .2OOS are interfering with their possession and making efforts to disPossess.

4. Learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents on instructions would submit that the lands claimed b]' the petitioners are the subject lands of LGC. It is further submitted that Government has fi1ed written statement in LGC and the same was clecreed in favour of the Government and the petitioners were declared as land grabbers lt is also submitted that aggrieved by the orders pas*d by the Special Court in LGC, the petitioners herein filed W.P.No.2O672 of 2005 before this Court and the same was dismissed ot O2.O2.2Ol'1.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently conte:rted that the lands in possession of the petitioners are different and distinct from the lands of LGC and the respondents without conducting any enquiry for identihcation and localisation of the land, treating the petitioners' lands in question as subject lands of LGC and making efforts to dispossess them from the subject lands. v 3 CVBR, ,/ W.P.No.1B jqS af 202i 6. [n ordcr to put a quietus to the dispute, and having rcgard to thc contention of the pctitioners that the properties situated in Sun,c,r Nos.26/EE and 26/RtJ admeasuring Ac.4.2O guntas are distinct and not the subject matter of LGC No.73 oi 2001, this Court deems_ir_ appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing rhe Tahsildar concerned to conduct a proper surve_y and demarcation. Upon such survey, if it is lound that the petitioners are in possession of lands Iorming part ot LGC No.73 of 2001, the respondents are at libcrt_v ro evict them by following due process of law. Conversely, if it is found that the lands claimed by the petitioners are not part of the iands covercd in LGC No.73 of 2001, the respondents shall not interfere with the However, if the said lands are required lor respondents are at liberty to initiaLe possession of the peti tioners any pu blic purpose, the appropriate proceedings in accordance with law and take following duc process of larv possession bt

7. with t he aborre observalions, this Writ petition is disposccl ol Therc shall be no order as to cosls Miscellancous applications pending, il any, shall stand closed i/TRUE COPY// ASSI SD/. C. DEEPIKA TANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER To, 1 ]i::J:ii's31,3:l!l'sy;,.8,??#,1#or Revenue, Dr B R Ambedkar Bhavan,

2. The Revenue Divisjonal Officer, Hayatnagar Division, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict 3. The Tahsildar, Hayatnagar l\,4andal, Ranga Reddy District. 4. One CC to SRt AKKAM ESHWAR, Advocate. IOPUC] 5 Twc CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetangana. 6. Two CD Copies. PVL ),$-- BSK I I I i l l i i HIGH COURT DATED:2610612025 o '-j() ,') l$fi 0 s! 'h ORDER WP.No.18145 of 2025 t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS