The High Court · 2025

Counsel for tlre Petitioner: SMT. P VIJAYA LAKSHMI CounselfortheRespondentNo.lto4:SRIL.RAVINDER,AGPFoRREVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.s & 6: SRI P.SREE RAGHU RAM' Sr' COUNSEL, REP. FOR SRI S.LAKSHMI KANTH WRIT PETITION NO: 18745 OF 2025 Between: 1. Karrolla Kishan,, S/o Balaiah, Age. 53 years,-.Occ' Agriculture' Fl'/o " fjianmiiiwaai vill6ge of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District'

2.PeddagollaSayawa,WolateBalaiah,Age'61years,.Occ'Agriculture'Rl/o - eLhmiiiwadi village of Tadwai mandal' Kamareddy District' 3. Devuoalli Yellawa', Wo Yellaiah, Age' 50 yearl O.cc' Agriculture' Rl/o - goh;;ii*rdi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' 4.KarrollaBandariBalaiah'S/oGangaiah,Age.T3years,occ.Agrrculture,Ri./o tiianmijr*ioi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District'

5. Dekuri lndrabai, W/o Siddi Ramulu, Age 45 y9a1s, Oc9' Agriculture' Rl/o - aranma;iwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' Aian;ajiwidi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' - 6.DakuriLaxmanRao,S/oMadhavaRao,Age.50years,occ.Agriculture,Rio 7. Dakuri Manikya Rao, S/o Ramaiah, .Age' 84 Y9arJ, .9c9' Agriculture' R'/o aEtimaliwadi'vitlage of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' . B. Dakuri Srinivas Rao,, S/o Manikya Rao, Age' 3{ yeqs, Occ' Agriculture' R/o - gr"i,l;ali*adi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' g.PaidiYellaReddy,,S/oVittalReddy,Age'.93Jg?r.s,Occ'Agriculture'Fl/o - b"uiipatti ,illage 6f.Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' brar*Zii*iOi village of Tadwai mandbl, Kamareddy District' l0.PeddaoollaMadhavi',W/oGangaraju'Age'36years'.OccAgriculture'Fi'/o' - ll.Peddaqolla Sailu,, S/o Pedda Rajaiah' Age 58 yea19' O9c' Agriculture' Fl/o e ial-mijiwaA i village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' iVo Ar5nrrjiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District'

12.Peddagolla Chinnawa,' W/o Late Shivaiah, Aged 50 ye91s, p9c' Agriculture' - 1 3. Sanoi Raiashekar,' S/o Ramulu, Age' 35 years-, Occ' Agriculture' Fyo '" 'l4.Chetpalli Pushpalatha,, W/o Lingam,.Age' 45 y9a1s.'.QcP Agriculture' Rl/o arair"rai*'iOi villag6 of Tadwai manda[' Kamareddy District' aianlri;lwaOi village oi.Tadwai mandal' Kamareddy District' ijiafrmallwaOi village of Tadwai mand-al, Kamareddy District' Brahma]iwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy ulstnct'

15. KurelliBalawa,, W/o Narsaiah, Age' 58 years,-.Ocgt Agriculture' Rl/o '- l6.Chinnagolla Balaiah,, S/o Mallaiah, fg-e' 55 Yqar:l 999' Agriculture' Fvo - '1 7. Kurelli Prameela,, Wo Balaiah, Age- - 40 years. . O9c. Agriculture' R/o ' ' '18. KurelliRajaiah,, S/o Ramaiah, Age- . 75 years' Occ' Agrrculture' FJo '" rjrar'.aii*iOi villa(e of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' Ei;hilJ,il;"ai vittage of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District' 'l9.Kurelli Laxmi,, W/o Lingam, Age. 40 years, O<:t. Agriculture, Fl/o Brahmajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy Dist-i :t. l

20. Sangi Balaiah,,. S/o _ Bhumaiah, Age. 50 years, Oc ;. Agriculture, R/o Brahmajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamaraddy bist.i ;t. 2l.Kupriyal_a Ba.shawa,, Wo Late Siddaiah, Age.50 years, r)cc. Agriculture, Rl/o Brahmajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy Dist'i )t.

22. ChinnagollaBajqi.rn, S/o Late Mallaiah, Age. S0 years, ( cc. Agriculture, Ryo 'SpA -Kamareddy "Rep Brahmajiwadi villlge of Tadwai mandal, Smt. Chinnagolla Gautami (wife). I) strict,

23. Pevini Anitha,, Wo Ravinder, Age. 38 years, O: ;. Krishnajiwadi village of Tadwai mandll, Kamar6ddy bistri t 24. 9ircillalagadeeshwar,, S/o Narayana, Age. 63 years, 1:c Krishnajiwadi village of Tadwai m'andai, Kimaredty Dist ri t. 25. Siricilla Ravinder,, S/o Vittal, Aqe. 52 vears. Orr . Krishnajiwadi village of Tadwai mand?|, Kamaieddy'Distri t Agriculture, Rio' Agriculture, R!/o Agriculture, Rl/o ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 J 4 5 o Plr-tggf Jglqr]gana,,, Dep_artment of Revenue, Rep, by its )rincipat Secretary, secrelanal, HyderaDad, I elangana The District Collector,, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District, -- ,langana The Revenue Divisional Officer,, Kamareddy Kamareddy )istrrct, Telangana The Tahsildar,, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District, Telz r gana $a9had Ali,, S/o. Mir Arshad Ali, age.52 yrs, Occ. Busines ;, R|/o. H.No. 16_7_ 7234, Osmanpura, Azampura, SaiEabad, Hyderabad lrshad AIi,, S/o. Mir lrshad Ali, Rl/o H_No. 16-7-723A, Osrr rnpura, Azampura, Saidabad,. Hyderabad. presenty residing in U.S.A. Rep I y its G.p,q. tibrOei, H.No. ,t}_t_- ' Rashad Ali, S/o Mir Arshad Ali, 7234, Osmanpura, Azampura, S,idabad, Hyderabad y-rs, Occ. Business 'R/o -age.S2 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndizr praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High ci urt may be pleased to issue an appropriate Direction, more particularly a writ of rv:ndamus, declaring the Notice bearing File No. Bl5o9l2o24, daled 31 .12.2024 rss red by Respondent No. 4 to mutate the names of Respondents No. 5 and 6 ar i inrtiating steps to dispossess the Petitioners from their agricultural lands admeas iring Ac oi.t o cts in Survey No. 95/8, Ac 0.0950 Gts in Survey No. 95/8/2, Ac 0.2t( c Gis in survey No. 1061N1, Ac 1.0700 Gts in survey No. 106/4/3 Ac2.21oo Gts i Survey lto. t6olr, lc ?3009 Gts in Survey No. 106/E/1 , Ac 0.0500 Gts in Surv: , tto. tOOlRu/t , Ac Z ]!!! Qts in Survey No. 1O6tEt1t2, Ac i.3000 Gts in Surv;y No. 106/E/2, Ac 1 ??99 9t. in Survey No. 106Nu/1/A, Ac 2.2500 Gts in Su- ey No. tOOA/u, Ac 1.2200 Gts in Survey No. 106/E/3, Ac 1.1600 Gts in Survey No 1-221211 ,Ac 1.1600 Gts in Survey No.1221213, Ac2.32oo Gts in survey No. 122rlr, r.1/1 , Ac 1..r600 Gts in Survey No. 1221AA112, Ac 1.'1600 Gts in Survey No. 122it.t.1/3, Ac 2.3200 cts in Survey No. 1221AA2, Ac 1.1600 Gts in Survey No. .122lAA:,1, Ac 1..1650 Gts tn a I SurveyNo.122l^A3t3,Ac0.2400GtsinSurveyNo.122tAA3l4,Ac2.0850Gtsin a;;;i N" 122t1A, Ac 2.0300 Gts in survev No. 89/tuA, Ac 2'0400 Gts in Survev f,to. eblele and Ac 0.2000 Gts in Survey No. 89/AA, situated at Abdullanagar Viilu*, iil;i Mandal, Kamareddy Distrtt, without affording any opportunity of h;;i"g and during the pendency oia civil dispute i.e. EP No. 2 of 2003 as illegal, arbitrafo, uniust, violative of the principles of natural justice and contrary to Articles t+ anO iOO-h of the Constitution of lndia and consequently call for the records-and set-aside the said notice thereby restrain the Respondents No 2 to 4 from oi,po..".,ingthePetitionersfromtheirland'withoutfollowingdueprocessoflaw and pass : IA NO :1 OF 2025 PetitionunderSection,l5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support ot the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct in" n".pono"nt No 2 io 4 to noi to dispossesi the Petitioners from their lands ,Or"r.rringAc0.'l0GtsinSurveyNog5/B,{c!0^g50GtsinSurveyNo'95iB/2' n" o.iaoo 6t, in Sr*"y No. 10674/1 , Ac 1'0700 Gts in Survey No 106/fu3 Ac 2.2,looGtSinSurveyNo.106/E,Ac2.2000GtsinSurveyNo.106/E/,1,-n^c^!.^os^oo cG , srrv"v No. 1O'6/Ru/1 , Ac 2.1650 Gts in Survey No. 106/E/1/2, Ac 1.3000 Gts insr*"Vtto.tOOlelZ,Acl.22OOGtsinSurveyNol06/Vu/1/A'Ac2'2500Gtsin sr*"v (o. 106/Vu, Ac1.22OO Gts in Survey No. 106/E/3, Ac 1.1600 Gts in survey ii,.izztztt, Ac 1.1600 Gts in Survey No' 1221213, Ac2'3200 Gts in Survey No' iZte1tit,Ac i.1600 Gts in Survey No. 122tAA1l2,Ac 1.1600 Gts in Survey No' lii,ieet6, Ac2.3200 Gts in Survey No 122lAA2, Ac 1.1600 Gts in Survey No' iiiilipp;z,l,Ac l.1650 Gts in Survey No. 122lAA3/3, Ac 0.2400 Gts in Survev No' tiii.inaztt+, Ac 2.0850 Gts in SurvLv No 122l1A, Ac 2'0300 Gts in Survev No ag/A/n, Ac 2.0400 Gts in Survey No. eslalE and Ac 0.2000 Gts in survey No' AgiAA,situatedatAbdullanaga'.Vill'g",TadwaiMandal'KamareddyDistrict pending disposal of the Writ Petition' and pass IA NO: 20F 2025 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to -s1ay i1," op"rrtion of the lmpugned Noiice vide File No. 8/509/2024 dated 3111212024 i..r"i Uv the 4th RespondLnt pending disposal of the Writ Petition' a IA NO: 30F 2025 Between: 1 Rashad Ali,, S/o. Mir Arshad Ali' age 52 yrs' Occ'.Business' F!/o' H No 16'7- 723A, Osmanpura, Azampura' Saidabad, Hyderaoao lrshad Ali,, S/o. Mir lrshad Ali, FUo H'No 16-7-723A, Osmanoura' Azampura' by its G P A Holder' Saidabad, Hyderabad, pt"."nirvit.ioing in u s'n Rep ' -2 I !l Rashad Ali, S/o Mir Arshad Ali, age'52 yrs' Occ Business;' R/o H No' 16-7- #Ji:o;',i";r;rra' Azampura, slioabah, Hvderabad ...PETITIONERS AND (

1. Karrolla Kishan,, S/o Balaiah, A99 .-53 years' Ot;t ' ijili-"iiiu"ai uirr6g" oi rid*ai mand-al' Kamaieddv Distti' 2. Peddagolla Sayawa, W/o late Balaiah' .fge' 61 Years' I ' b;rfi#d;oiVriise'oi taowai mandal' Kamareddv Distt i 3. Devupalli Yeliavva,, W/o Yellaiah, 4S.9' so y9grsr !)l " E;ui'i;iiiloi vittagb oi iadwal mandal'-Kamareddv Dist'i 4. Karrolla Bandari Balaiah, Sio Gangaiah' fOe' 71 Yells: 1 - ij-i r*i*iai viirige of iaowai ma-ndal' Kamareddy Dist-i 5. Dekuri lndrabai, W/o Siddi Ramulu' .Age' 45 Ygar!, ]: " E;i;rjilroiviirage ortaowai mandal' Kamareddy Distri O. Dakuri Laxman Rao, S/o Madhava Rao' Age 50 years' " E;i;ri*;oi vittage ot tadwai mandal' Kamareddy Distr 7. Dakuri Manikya Rao, S/o Ramaiah' .Ag-e' 84 years' ,l ' 6;i'l;rjffioi'uitrage-ot radwai mandal' Kamareddy Dislr 8. Dakuri Srinivas Rao,, S/o Manikya Rao'. Age 37 years' " 6;il;r;d;diviltage of tadwai mandal' Kamareddv Dislr 9. Paidi Yella Reddv,, S/o Vittal RedQy' Age' .9e -yg?r.t' " b"riip"riiriiragt6t'raowai mandal, Kamareddy District l0.Peddagolla Madhavi,, W/o Ganga rglg'.fOe' 36 years' '- bLh*i;lwioi village'6f radwai riandlt' Kamareddv Distt 11. Peddagolla Sailu,, S/o Pedda Rajaiah' Age' 58 years ' ' bir-r-Zil*iol villdge of Tadwai mindal' Kamareddy Dtstt 12. Peddaoolla Chinnawa,, W/o Late Shivaiah' Aged 50 ye '' i# B;h;iiwaJi ,ittagb of Tadwai mandal' Kamareddl 1 3- Sanoi Raiashekar,, S/o Ramulu, Age' 35 years' - lc' '" E*iYriii',^ir'Ji oi iaowai mandal, Kamareddv Dist ict' 14. Chetoalli Pushpalatha,, W/o Lingam, Age 45 years )cc ' - E;;tiffiiil;i rirag; ;i'raowai mlndal, Kamareddv Di" t ict' 15. KurelliBalawa,, W/o Narsaiah, Age' ..58 years' O :c' '" 'ri;;ffijil;ivittase-or raowai mandal, Kamareddv Di:;l ict' l6.Chinnaqolla Balaiah', S/o Mallaiah, Age 55 years' )cc '" E;r;';i'd;oi virrag; ot raowai mandal, kamareddv Di:l ict' lT.Kurelli Prameela,, Wo Balaiah, Age'- 40 years' ( cc' '' ii[i'r"jit"roi ,itase of Tadwai manda], Kamareddy Di:; -ict' S/o Ramaiah, Age 75 years, ():c 18. KurelliRajaiah, ' Brahmajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy Di; 'ict 19. Kurelli Laxmi,, W/o Lingam, Age 40 years, ( Brahmajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, KamareddY Dis rict. 20.Sanoi Balaiah,, S/o Bhumaiah, A9.e:. 50 yea.rs' ( cc' '" Eliiirri*ioi viitage ot raowai mand5l, Kamareddv Dis rict' 21 . Kupriyala Bashawa,, W/o Late Siddaiah,-Age 50 years Oc - ij;;h;;J.*divillage of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddv Dis rict' "-iiiusj" . Agriculture, t. cc. Agriculture, t. c. Agiiculture, ;t. )cc. Agriculture, :t. ;c. Agriculture, )t. )cc. Agriculture, )t. cc. Agriculture, lt. )cc. Agriculture, -t. )cc. Agriculture, )cc. Agriculture, ct. )cc. Agriculture, ct. rrs, Occ. Agricul )istrict. Fl/o R/o Fi/o R/o R/o Rio Fl/o R/o Fl/o Rl/o Fl/o ture, Agriculture, Fl/o . Agriculture, Rl/o Agriculture, Fi/o i . Agriculture, PJo Agriculture, R/o Agriculture, R/o Agriculture, Fl./o Agriculture, Fi/o c- Agriculture, R/o

22. ChinnagollaRajaiah, S/o Late Mallaiah, Age 50 years, occ. Agriculture,_Fi./o -- B;;hffii*;di 'vittaqe of Tadwai mandal'-Kamar-eddy District, Rep by SPA 23. Devini Anitha,, Wo Ravinder, Age. 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rio Smt. Ctiinnagolla Gautami (wife). Krishnajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District'

24.SircillaJaqadeeshwar,, S/o Narayana, Age. 63 years, Occ. Agriculture' Fyo Krishnajifradi village of Tadwai m'andal, Kamareddy District'

25. Siricilla Ravinder,, Sio Vittal, Age. 52 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Krishnajiwadi village of Tadwai mandal, Kamareddy District

26.State of Telangana,, Department of Revenue, Rep, by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, HYderabad, Telangana

27.The District Collector,, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District, Telangana 28.The Revenue Divisional officer,, Kamareddy Kamareddy District, Telangana 29.The Tahsildar,, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District, Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order granted vide its order dated o2.o7.2025 in W.p.No.18745 of 2O2S and dismiss the Writ Petltion with exemplary costs and in the interest of justice as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt S.SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FoR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 & 6: SRI P.SREE RAGHU RAM, Sr' COUNSEL, REP. FOR SRI S.LAKSHMI KANTH The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER a / HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAN(i INA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENT GOPAL WRIT PETITION No.18136 and 18745 ot 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 15.L2.2O25 w.P.No.18136 of 2025 BETWEEN: Karrolla Swamy AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its PrinciPal Secretary, Revenue Department and 5 others Petitioner )?:spondents WRIT PETITION No.18745 of 2O2 I 'i BETWEEN: Karrolla Krishnan and 24 others AND The State ol'Telangana Rep. by its PrinciPal SecretarY, Revenue Department and 5 others Petitioner I espondents :COMMON ORDER: Writ petition No. 18136 of 2025 is 1i ed for the lolloq,ing prayer 2 - ":..t: i:st:e an appropnate Writ Order or Drection ntore particltlarla a Writ of Mandamu.s declaring the Nolice beanng 1,. No.B/sos/2d24, dqted 31.12.;o2i, -i"""i*' Respondent No.4 to mutate the names o1 ni.poni"iir'}ro".s :,"d : ?y initiating steps ro disposs "i" tnt paiion", io^ the Petitioner agriatturat land aimeasunng 4".61.07 d'" ,n S.y Nor1061 AA of Abdulta Nasar Viltase," r"ii"i t.,t""a"t, KamoReddg Distict without illordtng- rng opport irt,] ,1 !fo1ne.a11t^yunns._the pendenis .f ; ;;i ;,:;,;;)"i...i u, t:1:z ol, 2U0-J as illegal, orbtlrary. unjust, uioiatiue of the pnncrptes ol nolurol iustice and cotirory to Anicles Ii and ll0 A of t|rc Constitirion of tndia ond cotsequentlu call for tne recorcls and set.oside the soid nottce therebg ,"itrorn ih. l:^y?:o:*". N?:.2 g 4 from dispossessins ihe- pe;i;:;o;e, Jrom tus tand without following due process oi taw..." Writ petition No.18745 of 2025 is filed for following prayer: n G-ts,. 'Uri. '...to issue an appropriate Direction ntore porticulctrly a Wit of Mandqmus declaring the Notiie beonrict I,.tLe No.B/So9/2o24, dated 3i.12.2o24 issuei oi n"lriona.nt No.4 to mutate the nantes of Resportdents S o,l5 A o,ra initiating steps ,o drs/ a s a c, t t", a7' i i n ; ;;'#:ffi ;; n, o..T., i, i" T,i l l ^",, f.: I No.95/8, Ac.0.O95O Gts, in Suiueg uo.gVEiZ,' Ac.o.2BOO G-ts,_ _in Surueg No.1o6/A/ 1, arlt.ozoi' -Ctr' i)r''su_.g No.106/A/3, Ac.2.2tOO Cts, in Suruey tto. tiiie,"ar'2. ZOOO -Ctr,' ^i:. _Surueg No.1O6/E/ 1, ar.O"OSOO in"srru"g No.106/Ru/ I, Ac.2.1650 Gts, in Surueg -itr. rcZil tlz, Ac.1.30OO Gts, in Surueg No.1O6/E/2, irliZOO'2", i" Surueg-No.1o6Nu/ t/A, A;.2.25oo ot", i" sirr.g-ii t'oa7 vu, Ac.1.22OO Gts, in Surueg No.106/E/3, ar.l.'tAOO- Ctr, in Surueg No.122/2/1, Ac. 1.160O Ot" ,,r'srriiy- Uo.-i2>/2/3, Ac.2.32O0 Gts, in Suruey No.t22/AAt/ 1, e"i. tiOiZtr, i, .Surueg- No.122/AA1/i,- - Ac.1.16O0 . Gts, tn irrr.g No.122/AA1/3, Ac.2.32OO Cts, in Suru,ey no.lZileeZ, Ac.1.1600 Gts. in Suruery No.122/ A,43/ t, ai. t. tiiiZtr, ,n ":,,..J .No 122/AA3/i,, Ac.o.24oo Gts, irr- iurr.g No.122/AA3/4, Ac.2.O8SO Gts, in Srrr.g io.liZtla, A1.2.O3OO Gts, in Surveg No.B9/A/A, ar.i.O<OO Ct", in Suruea No.Bg/B/E, and Ac.o.2ooo Gts in s"rrlg ioibtea, 2o o I r vi t t a s e ra d w a i u i ii i,i, io n a a s "* t: ! .i.:,.! t4_srnct .u)tthout- affording anA opportunitg of hearino and :i"i? ,ry pendencA of u ciuit dispute i.e., Ei. wo.Z oi zOOl as.tuegat, arbttrory, unjust, uiolq.tiue of the principtes oJ nqturot justice and contrary to Arlicles l2 oia ii,i"f,'o1 tn" Constitution of India and. consequentlA calt 1or the rJcoras and set-ctside the sqid notic" til"r"ilg, - ,""iir'i' ,n" Respondents Nos.2 to 4 from d.isposses"iig 0:,;"iJiit'_n"r" " : u o "7, - b .- -ff,om their land u,,ithout fotioturng due pr6cs5s of law . . . . r a 3

2. Since the impugned order challenged in bc lh the writ petitions is one and the same, there matterl; are heard together and disposed of by way of this commor rrder.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petiti 'I-Iers and Sri L.Ravninder, learned Assistant Governmetrt. Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nosl to 4 art Sri P.Sree Raghu Ram, learned senior counsel repres:nting Sri S. Lakshmi l(anth, learned counsel for respolt lent Nos.5 and 6. Perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would ubrnit that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of various extents of agricultural lands situated at Pl dullanagar Village, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District 'l erein after referred as 'subject property') and their rl rmes were incorporatc<l in the revenue records ar ( pattadar passbooks and title deeds were issued to the p': itioners. It is further submitted that respondent No.5's pr:decessors- in-interest l.rave instituted a suit in O.S. No.7 27 of 1972 claiming rights over the subject property of tht petitioners jrf]d the same \(ras decreed in favour of prer --cessors of respondent No.5 4

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that respondent No.5 herein has filed an application seeking implementation of the decree in O.S.No.727 of 7972 in terms of execution proceedings in tr.P.No.O2 of 2003. He would submit that the final decree proceedings obtained in O.S.No.727 of 1972 are barred by limitation and as such E.A.No.OI of 2O2S was filed under Order XXI Rule 9l of C.P.C. He would submit that on the back of the petitioners, the unofficial respondents filed a writ petition before this Court vide W.p.No.31573 of 2024 and this Court vide its order dated 12.11.2024 whlle disposing of the writ petition, directed the respondent No.4 to examine the representation dated 22.O4.2024 submitted by the petitioners seeking for mutation of their names in the revenue records and for issuance of e-pattadar passbook in their favour in respect of the sub.lect property and if the said application fulfils all the conditions laid down under Section Z of t]ne ROR Act, 2020, pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of the ROR Act, 2O2O, within a period of two (02) ,r=o:th_" from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 5

6. Based upon the said order, the respond: tt Tahsildar had issued proceedings vide File No.B/509,/ 1,024, dated 3l .12.2024 directing the petitioners to file heir claims along with supporting documents and records rertaining to the subject land to enable him to conducl enquiry for implementation of the judgment ald decree in O.S No.Z27 of 1972 and also in terms of order passed in I.p.No.O2 of 2023 and as per the Rules made thereunder i r Telalgana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) t\:t, 2025 by issuing notices to file objections with regard r : all the 32 applications made by the petitioners along witl supporting documents and records within (7) days. 7 . Learned counsel for the petitioners wouirl submit that the main grievarce of the petitioners is .l Lat pending adjudication of the application, respondent Nr; 4 is making efforts to amend the revenue records at thr: instance of respondent No.6. He would further subrr it that the petitioners have already filed their object., n petitions before the ofhcial respondents and apprehenc that, unless the objection petitions are duly considere I ard the petitioners are afforded a sufficient opportuni - 9f leariqg, 6 at the behest of the unofficial respondents, the official respondents may be persuaded to pass an impugned order adversely vacating the rights of the petitioners. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner in W.p.No. 1g 136 of 2O25 would submit that if aly orders are passed behind the back of the petitioner, the petitioner,s valuable right under Article 3OO-A of Constitution of India would be infringed. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

9. Sri P.Sri Raghu Ram, Iearned senior counsel representing learned counsel for the unofficial respondents without going into the stretch of the subject, would fairly concede to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners arld seeks direciion to the official respondents to grant suffrcient opportunity of hearing and a conduct proceedings strictly in accordance with law.

10. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue would submit that all the petitioners may file the necessary objections, if not already frled, and the objections shall be ,, 7 considered in accordance with 1aw by -he offrcial respondents in all aspects and after cons't ering such objections, appropriate orders would be pas sed in due course of time, strictly in accordance with la.vr Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders. 1 1 . Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned senior counsel for unofficial resprl rdents and learned Assistant Government Pleader for F.t venue, this Court without making any observations on tl e merits or demerits of the case, since, at present unde' Rule 8 of Rules made under the Teiangana Bhu Bharatl i (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025, the Revenue Divisic,t al Officer is appropriate authorit5r to examine the case of th : petitioners and since the notices issued to the petitionr: s herein in File No.Bl5O9 l2O2a, dated 31.12.2024 t,i v€ already become infructuous due to afflux of time, he RDO is directed to issue fresh notices to the petition(:r s, unoffic'al respondents and all interested parties and gr,r rt sufficient opporhrnity of hearing to them and pass apprc priate order strictly in accordance with law. In the event cl issuing any fresh notice, needless to mention that the prt 'ties to this I I t I \ 8 writ petition are at liberty to frle objection petitions within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of such fresh notice. Upon frling such objections, if any, the official respondents shall consider such objections and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law and the official respondents are further directed to examine on the aspect of the limitation while undertaking such exercise.

12. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall To, \ stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD EPUTY REGIS SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Telangana, State of Telangana. tariat, Hyderabad,

2. The District Collector,, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District, Telangana 3. The Revenue Divisionat Officer,, Kamareddy Kamareddy District' Telangana 4. The Tahsildar,, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District, Telangana 5. One CC to SMT. P VIJAYA LAKSHMI Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI S.LAKSHMI KANTH, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRl. S SURENDER REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana. a

9. Two CD Copies BS B, H]GH COURT DATED:1511212025 r) tL' ,r-- tl- ii,-;: Ah, \- s (} a **t, a l-txtvr* '::-, COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.18136 and 18745 of 2025 WRIT PETITTONS ARE DISPOSED OFF WITH OUT COST l \y w