High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. 2 a !) 4 5 - The State of Telanoana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderadad.' Ihe Station House Officer, Dundigal police Station, Dundigal. G a n d i m a i s a m m a M a n d a t, Med c h a I - tr/ a I k al gr= ri O i si riCi- I1.^,,j:?l1sl9"Jgl,ol..potice ..Dundigat police Station Dundisat. (Janotmarsamma IVtandal, I\/edchat_lr/alkajgiri District l11uS11 Su;,ender_Reddy, S/o S. Narsimha Reddy, aged about 45 years. ucc. ..Agncutture, R/o H N_o 5_20. Bowrampet Viitag!, Ganaimaisainma_ Dund igal Ma ndal, I\/edchal-tvtalkal giri Otstrict-s00 ba'C P*p^L1 Srflnth R.eddy, S/o S. yeila Reddy, aged about 36 years, Occ. Employee, R/o H. No. 3-83, Bowrampet Villaje. Gandimaisamma_ Dundigal [t:1rd.?l.JY.^o"lat-Matkajgiri Districr_Rep Uy 6is CeA uotAer Saiugan- Veira 5999I_919.s..ienta Reddy. Aged 56 years,'Occ. Business, R/o H "No. 3_83, uowrampet viflaoe. Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Medchal-tvlalkajgiri District. - ' ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particurarly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil dispute between me and the unofficial respondents herein in respect of land admeasuring 1000 sq. yards in survey no. g25 and g26 situated at Bowrampet Viflage, Dundigar-Gandimaisamma Mandar, under Dundigal Municipality rVledchal-Malkajgiri District' Telangana Stata as illegal' arbitrary and high harcod and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere with tlrr: civil dispute between me and the unoff cial respondents herein in respect cf larc admeasuring 1000 sq yards in sutvey no' 325 and 826 situated at Bov./ramF()t village, Dundigal-Gand imaisam ma lVlandal, under Dundigal lrilunicipality V ed chal-Malkajgiri District, Telanganrr St;ate' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the :ircLlmstances stated in the affidavrt fileC ir support of the petition, the High Court n"ay t e pleased to direct the 2nd anrl :ir:l r3spondents not to interfere with the civil dislrute between me and the unofric al '.-'spondents herein in respect of lar d a'lme lsuring 1000 sq.yardsinsurvey'rrts25and826situatedatBowrampret\/illa(e'Dundigal- Gandimaisamma lr/l;rrrrlal under Dundigal lr/lunicipality tvledc ral-tvlalkajgiri District, Telangar a Stat,-" pending disposal of the above writ pet tron Counsel for the Petitic'ner: SRI S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respc,rldent No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the lc,llowing: ORDER w THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. 8100 of 2O25 1 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having iegard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage ancl the rrature of /rs involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofflcial respondent Nlos.4 and 5 is not necessary for adjudication of the presenl- Writ Petition,

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are interfering in the civil oi:;pute that exrst between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents.l ancl 5, which is the subject matter of a suit, vide O.S.No.429 of 2025 and are coercing him, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as illegal and arbitrary.

4. Learned Govcrnment Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.l to 3, while denying the writ averments, has placed before this Court the written instructions dt.27.06.2025 under the signature of the 3'c respondent. By the written instructions, it is stated that the petitioner herein had made a dial-100 call to the staff of 2 '\ \ "" iBq ';'). - respondent lrros.2 and 3 on 22.06.2025 and on recoivin,l thr, dial-100 call, the pa[roriing ;taff i.e. porice Constabres - g60g anJ 8970 I-ad visited the spot and on ,,isiting the site, rt revealed that tl-ere rs a civil dispute betwee. ttrr: r':tirioner and the unofficiar res,onderrts ht:rern in respect of the subje.t ard and thus, the staff who had atterded the dial_100 call, suggesterd the )etitioner to approach the concerned Hon ble (.ivil Court For redressa cF l)ls qrievance; and that on abtending to irc;166r.ru10 dial_100 call, the l;taff i-; ve made a GD enl_ry to the sairl effccl . 5. LearretJ lovernment pleacler further submits that ,he respondents- authorities (lxc3Dt attending to dial-100 call receivecr from fi e petitioner are not inl,er.f :ring in the civil dispute between the pelitioner and respondent Nr;4 and 5 herein, nor harassed/thre;rtenr:c o_ rnterfered with the life ar ci Iiberty of the petitioner at any point o. time, 6. The afc r:said submission nrade on behalf cl. the re spondents_ authorities ,-nde. the cover of written instructions is piaceci on r:cord. 7 . In \ ie\ry c,l the aforesaid submission, and takir g o lt€ rrf the fact that the respc r 1:nts-authorities craim to have visirel the sL bject site, pursuant tc citli rsqsiyed from the petiticner hcre:in, and that the respondent:,;-a ul I (,rities are neither interfering in the civil dil;puk that may exist bebr'/een :he petitioner and the 6ri, respon Jent he.ein, nor threatenino or ltittassing the petitioner ther eby, interr,3rin(r wil h his riFe 3 and libety, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed not t0 interfere in the civil dispute and also with the life and Iibety of the petitioner except in accordance with law. B Subject to above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

9. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,elrrLn-#rrcen To,

1. The Principal Secretary' Home Department, Secretariat' Hyderabad' State of Telangana. Dundigal^ Police Station' Dundigal'

2. The Station House Officer, - - er"airnaGirma lvlandal' Medchal-Malkajgiri District 3 The Sub-lnspector of Police, Dundigal Police Station' Dundigal " Ci-nO i*i''.rmma Mandal, Medchal-Malkaig iri District 4. One CC to SRI S.SRIDHAR, Advocate IOPUC] 5.TwoCCstoGPFoRHoME,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD CoPies BSR BS M. I i l I I I I I i i I ! I I i i I 'i , I { I I I I I I r I I i t I : HIGH COURT DATED:2710612025 ORDER WP.No.18100 of 2025 =:=_:= . i,ti: S f/ Y o _l- 0I Ji,, il[ z * ...t. '\,- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT CC)STS IT , ,:1 .l r'