L Narsing Andalu Wo Omkar Goud v. 1. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5th respondent in calling the petitioners to the police Station and making them to sit in the police station till late nights in relation to FIR No.66 of 2ozs and threatening to implicate them in the said case and thereby causing interference with their personal lives and liberty as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutiona I and violative of Article 21 of rh,:: lc,nstitution of lndia, and consequently direcj the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 hr>ri.,ir k: take action against the 5th respondent her':in for his illegal acts, in accorria'rc: tvith Law. lA NO: 1 OF 202!^5 Petition unde r Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr;um,;tances stated in the affidavit frleJ rr support of the petition, the High Clurl may be pleased to direct the 5'h r:spc ndent herein not to call the petltioners -o the p,)lice station or in any manner irte,rfr:rer with their personal lives and liberty, perdin I dlsposal of the main Writ Petitic n in the interest of justice. Counsel for the P')titioners: SRI POLE VISHNU Counsel for the R,:spondents: GP FOR HOME The Court mader tlte following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.I 8062 of2025 ORDER: Heard leamed counsel for the petitioners and leamed Govemment Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 5, and perused the record. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. The case of the petitioners in brief is that the 5'h respondent is calling the petitioners to Police Station and making them to sit in the Police Station from morning till night in the name of investigation into Cr.No.6612025 even though, the petitioners are not arrayed as accused in the aforesaid crime, which action of the respondent authorities it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Arlicle 2l of the Constitution ol India.

3. Per contra,learned Govemment Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5 would submit that the son of petitioner Nos. I and 2 and, brother of petitioner No.3 is arrayed as an accused in Cr.No.66l2025, which occurred on 12-05-2025 at20.O0 hours wherein it has been alleged by the complainant that the son of petitioner Nos.l and 2 and brother of 3'd respondent had attacked her father Sri 2 .-rI \--- \' .1 N.Prabhal ar r.,,ith an intention to kill him and had s,:ugl .t for taking action a,rainr. him, based on which, a case in Cr.No.66/2( 25 has been registere d ar r[ being investigated into.

4. [,,:a rn : I Govemment Pleader for Home flftLrer : ubmits that since. : c,:ur;t:d No. 1 in the aforesaid crime is rrbsc,.rnding, the respondr:n t rull-rorities obtained the call data recorcr of the lccused and found that p: or and immediately after the occurrence of he incident, the accused I'lit. I in the aforesaid crime had spokon tc th : petitioners for considr:rrbJe length of time and as such, the author ties for the pulpose ol'irlr,:stigation into the aforesaid crime aud to as reltain as to involvenrent o petitioners in the commission of aforesaid crime, have called the re-itioners to the Police Station as suspects.

5. Lr,alnt:rl Ciovernment Pleader for Home woulcl fulther submit that sinc:. the rnain accused in the aforesaid crime is absr onding, the responde n euthorities are unable to . proceed fi-r fthe with the investige ti rn r o asceftain complicity of the petitioner-s in tl re aforesaid

6. Learnrc[ Govemment Pleader would furthe r surmit that since, the investirlar.ion into the aforesaid crime is in prog.'ess, thr authorities on ascerla nir6l whether the petitioners are involvec or not in the aforesaid crime, would take further steps either to issue notice under Section 94/ll9 of Bharariya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) as witness or under Section 35(3) of BNSS as an accused and thereafter would take further action in accordance with law.

7. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Govemment Pleader for Home is taken on record.

8. Since, the respondent authorities have now informed this Court of the complicity of the petitioners in the commission of offence vide Cr.No.66l2025, which is pending investigation, this Court is of the view that the respondent authorities are to be directed to take further action to investigate into the aforesaid crime strictly in accordance with law. 9- Subject to above observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. t0 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. //TRUE coPY// SD/-K. SAI KUMARI DEIUT+E9ISrRAR SEGflOI{TOFFICER The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Director General of Police, Lakdikapool, Hvderabad. The Superintendent of police, Nalgondd Oistrici. NatqonOa. IE 9if F lnspector of potice-.Nairpaili poticJ Strtio-n, Natgonda District. I ne $_u_b-tnspector of Police,.Marriguda police Station, Nal!'onda District. One CC to SRI POLE VISHNU, Ad-vocate IOPUCI Two CCs to GP for Home, High Couh for ihe State of Telangana at Hyderabad lOUTl Two CD Copies - ' To, 1 2 J 4 5 6 7. o_ M MP BS CC TODAY HI,GH COURT DATED"27t0612025 I .- :- ".a: i,ii ('r 2; ,lil?ffi '.r: .cl .t_. \l -.: -:4" - ORDER WP.No.181162 ot.2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRII'PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1 l1' ) L.