✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

S. Sudhakar Reddy v. Smt. M. Satyakumari & Anr.

Criminal Petition No. 409 of 2008P SWAROOP REDDY

Case at a glance

Bench
P SWAROOP REDDY

Outcome

Dismissed

Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Based on the allegations made in the complaint, definitely there is prima facie case against the petitioner. Maybe the police earlier reported the case as false, but on that sole ground it cannot be held that there is no prima facie case against the…
  • Para 44. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the admission stage itself. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J January 18, 2010. PV

Judgment

Cause title

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.409 OF 2008 Between: S. Sudhakar Reddy ……Petitioner

– Accused AND Smt. M. Satyakumari & another .....Respondents

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.409 OF 2008

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner S. Sudhakar Reddy, accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C. No.792 of 2006 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kurnool, [ Crime No.253 of 2004 of Two Town Police Station, Kurnool District ] filed by his wife Smt. M. Satyakumari, respondent No.1 herein, for the offences under Sections 498-A, 324 & 506 IPC and 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act,

2.

Heard both sides.

3.

Based on the allegations made in the complaint, definitely there is prima facie case against the petitioner. Maybe the police earlier reported the case as false, but on that sole ground it cannot be held that there is no prima facie case against the petitioner. The entire questions raised are questions of fact and it is not desirable to discuss the merits of the case at this stage. Suffice it to say that there is prima facie case against the petitioner, as such, there are no grounds to quash the proceedings against him.

Operative part

4.

Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the admission stage itself. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J January 18, 2010. PV

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 409 of 2008). ← Search more judgments