Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not renewing the license of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to renew their license of the petitioner forthwith and further direct them to supply kerosene for the month of May, 2005 and onwards to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MEHERCHAND NOORI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court at the admission stage made the following
ORDER:
Operative part
The grievance of the petitioner is that though he made an application for the dealership of kerosene to the first respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Nyalkal Mandal, Medak District, he is not passing any orders on the renewal application made by him. Therefore, he approached this Court seeking a direction to the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the renewal application with challans made by him. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the first respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer is directed to pass appropriate orders on the renewal application of the petitioner within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to him. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ (K.C.BHANU, J) 24th May, 2005. Note: furnish c.c. in two days. B/o kvni/vgb To 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nyalkal Mandal, Medak District. 2 The Collector (CS), Medak at Sangareddy. 3 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 2CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.