✦ High Court of India · 26 Jun 2025

lvluthanola Sugappa v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,353 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS for declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 for not considering the application dated 07-11-2024 and not providing the information regarding fixing the date of hearing filed U/s 23(1) of the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens acf, 20O7, including the interlocutory application in respect of the agricultural land property bearing survey No. 2511A, 2solulN2, 251|U, 2521U, 252tEEt2, 252tUU, 251lEEl2, 250iE, Admeasuring 3.3800 Ac. Gts, at Jaklair Village, Makthal mandal, Narayanpet District., and to declare the actions of the Respondent No.2 are totally illegal, improper, arbitrary, L-.ust and viotations of the principles of Natu.al Justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ( r. lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in -support of the petition, the High co r rnay be pleased to direct the Responrlerrt No.5 to not to alienate the prog_-.rty in respect of the agricultural land property bearing survey No. 2S1lA, 25( .t,AtZ, 251tU. 2S2lU, 252lEEl2, 252lUU, 251lEEl2, 250/E, Admeasuring 3.38( 1.) Ac Gts, at Jaklair Village, Makthal manclal, Narayanpet District., pending disl .;at of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitir:ner : SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : ASST. GP FOR Rt,VENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER _--retr-"__r@lF THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE .V.BTIASTGB REDPY WRIT PETITION No.L799L of 2025 ORDER: 'lhis u,rit petition is filecl sccking lirllou'ing relicl: -lfol thc rcasons state(l ir-r thr. irccorl]Prrn\.ing afliclavit, tt ts 1lr;t-t ccl that the IIrr0'lrlt, cour.L tuar- lte ltleasecl lo l)iiss ilrl olclctor or(le.s i)ne itl rrirlIllle ol\[ttl'l' oF lltANl)AMUS tirr declaung tlle a( troll ol th( tiesl)on(lcnt No 2 ti)r trol c ottsi<lcting the al)plrc.rtion clatccl 07 1l 202'l arrrl rlot pro\r(litrg the itrfotrnatLorr r-t'iiarrling lrxiug the (iiil('ol-treariLrg lilect U/s 23(1) ol the trtaitrletrartce and \\'ellarc ol l)lrerlts:rtrrl senior (.rliz(. S acL. 2O07, includ,ng th(' utt(,rl(x)uto11 .ipplicatlotl in resl)e( t ol llre ;tgtLcttltural lirrrrl lrlolrcrrtr irearing sttrvel' No 251/A, hOlUlLl2' '25llU' 2li2lU' 252lDEl2' '2:2iUlJ,'251i1':,812,250/Ii, A<lrttt irstrrjng l 38OO Ac' Cts' i11 'lrrlilrrrr Villagc' Milkthal rtt:rttt]ttl.Nirt-ar'allpetlJ]StrlCl,ztttrllrrtler.litt-t'tl)e.LClto]]scrItltc[lr,sllrlrtrlel]tNo.2ale toLirllt ilit:gttl, itnproper, ar-bitrirr-t, lllr.lLlsl ilrl(l riolirtiotts ol-lllc f)litl('il)l( s ol Natural .Jltstl(.(, a11(l to pass sLlcll otltcf or(let ()r ol(Lcts as tl-lo coLtfL ttlilt'tltettl ltt aticl 1rt_oPl'r in rll(' intctcsl oIjrtstice."

2. lt is sLalcd tl-ra[ thc 5rlI respondent is t]-re son o[ thc pctitioner' It is lurtl.rer stated that the qrh fcspondent b1' cocrciotr, thre:rt and undue int]utetlceanrlinalraudulentmelnne]:,hils|akerltlrcl-lctitrotrcr-Lothe3ld uitle Docutnctrt No.241 of 2O2l rcspondcnt ancl got exccuted u Ciilt Deed dzrtccl 1 1. .O2.2021 in respect ol agricr-tltural (iLrntirs in Survey Nos.251lA, '25OlLI lLl'2, 251 lU, 25'2lU' 252/trV12' Iand admczrsltring Acs. 3.3800 252lUU,25llEtr/2and250lE,situa[t--datJaklairVillagc'MakthalMandal' Nttrav:rnpct District (ior sl.rorl, .Lhc sullject larrcl,) in ftrvour of the 5d' rcsponrlcntandtookallthcoriginaldocutnen[softhcsubjccLlatndsuchas pa ttadar passbook and title decd ar-rd aggrievecl by the szrme ' thc petitioner hzrs loclged a complaint against the 5tl' responclent belbrc ths 4th;sspsndent Lrnde r Sections 42O, 506 reacl \\'ith Section 34 IPC, whicll is numbered as lrtR No.26 of 2023 and the 4rl, rcsponclcnt is inve s tigatirrg thc same. Itis *EB. EH i.#.Jfryrr-, \. ) CVBR.,] \lt. I'. No. I 799 I cd 202-; ftrrthcr stated tirat he has filed :rn :rpl)lication d:Lted r,r.09.2023 btforc thc 2',,1 rcsponclent -1nle1' Secrior-r 23(1) of thc Mzrir-rtc; rrc,-. :rncl Wcllarc ol I);rr-r:r.rts lrnrl Seniol Citizr:rrs Acl, 2OO7 (for shorL, rl , ,\ct ) trntl u,hcn tlrt' pctittoncr' ('arrrc to l<rrou- thal hc ltirs llled rhc lrLrlrr rrtion irr r,r'r-ong .1lrIisrlrt'Liorr, thc l)cLitioncl rnaclc arrotltcr- applic:rtion cl rtl'.,:l (t7.11.2024 :rlong rvith rnlcr.krcuLoln application [or providing intcrint n ] ntell:tnce [_rc'[o rc thr. 2'"i rcsponrlcnt 'l'1',e gricvance ol thc pctitioncr is tl evln aftcr lzrpsc ol' nczrrh, lrr,o ],cars. tlle 2,,,i respondent did not tal<e iL ,, a,::tion on thc saicl irpplir',rlion. I lenct', tltc presct-rt u.rit pr:tition. :1. (}rnsLclr'rr:cl the subnrissions oI thc lc:L r r i: I counsc l [or tl-rt' pctitiont:r and lcltr-ned Assistant (iovernmcnL Ir1 ' , rler :rppc:rring lir' lcsl:<;rrdc'rrt Nos.I trt 3 atrd wilh their conscnt, lhis ,'. rit pctition is lx:ir.rgi clisl;osccl ol at thr trrlmission slagc. Ilt vicrv of thc llai Lre'oI r-clicf sougl.rt Ii;r in this rvrrt pctrtion, issuance of notice to rcspondent N . r is dispensed u.ith. .1 Learnccl counsel for- the pctiLioner vehern r' t-,r' ionLended tlttrt lhc Mirintcntrnl'c lnrl l\/eilarc ciI Palcnts:rncl Scniur- r izc'ns Act. 2007 is t:rractr:ri \\'ith a liluditble object of ltrovidir-rg morc (' , c tive provision frrr. maintcnancc and u'clfare of parents all)d scltior citizctrs .rnd it. rnakcs a lcgal oblrgzrtion lirr childrr:n:urd Iteirs to provide maintenarr l,' l.o scnior citizcr-rs :rnd 1t:rrcnLs, lt_r'rtrorrthh.:rllou,ance and it arlso prorriclc ;implc, spt:cd), ::rnrl ir.rcxJrcnsive mcchalLism for tl-rc protcction of lifc anc{ )r lDer tl of tl'rc olclcr llcrsor)s. I.czrrnccl counscl furthcl contcr-rdcd thal er t r r rrftt r lapse of t r.r o vcirrs, tlr(' 2,,,1 rcsltonclenI is not disposing oI tl-L lir i) lr carLlo lr dzltc(l I l I f t i .-TGF!F-'. ..:.4 :'1' a.r 3 CVBR,,I W.P.No.17991 of 2025 07 .1 1.2024 lilecl by thc petitioner, which is causing Sreat harclship to the petitioner, u,l.ro is agecl about 78 ),ears.rncl suflcrinq rnith olcl age ailments

5. Learncd Assistant Governl'nent Plezlcler for Rcvenuc appcarlng lor respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has not clisputecl filing ol an application under Section 23(1) of the Act by t1-re petitioner on the lile o[ the 2'd respondcnt :rgainst the 5tl' rcsPondent. 6'Inr,icwoftheabovesubmissions,thisCourtiSofthcopir.rior.r that tite e ncls of justice would be mct lf thc 2"d responclenl is directcd to clispose of thi: application dated 07 -ll 2024 sullmittcrl b1' rhe pt titiotrcr unclcr Section 23(l ) of the Acl within a period of tu'o (02) months li om the <latc of reccipt o[ a copy of this Court. in any czrse, if the 2"d respondent is nol in a position to <lispose of the said application, l-re sl-rall dispose of the interlocutorl' application hled by thc petitioner for provicling interim maintenance rvithin a period of tu'o (O2) u'eeks fiom the date o[ r-ece ipt of a copyoftl-risorder,afterissuingnoticetoallLhepersonsu'hoareinterestcd and affected by passing such an order'

6. lVith the above observations, this Writ Petitior-r is disposcd of Therc shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if anv, shall "'"?6Q!ftSSf{l: ,TRUE COPY/i t- . JAWAHAR REDDY AsstsRectsrRaR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secretariat' Hyderabad' State oi'iurrngdnr, Telangana State' ..--ra :1xr::.f 1r

2. The Revenue Divisional 3 rhe rahs d",, .,0 ,"n,.;l::;:;HTlrl"Llil,;l_,;::::ff.,

4. The Station Hou:;e Officr r erangana-500004. :r' P S Khairatabad, Hyderabar Hyderabad I t I

5. One CC to SRt SURESH SHt 6. Truo CCs to GD FOR REVEN H;.L;;',l"rBli;" no,u'

7. Two CCs to Gp Fotr,

8. Two CD Copies -/BSK PVL V SAGAR, Advocate. [Opl_l(]l UE, High Court for the Stare; of Telangana High Court for the State ol .l ,tsng2n2 ,1 HIGH COURT DATED:26106121025 j 'j- ,.) 15 r 20i5 ' l)- \".. -\,., ,../ ] ORDER WP.No.17991 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSiTS ./),/4 /z- //o/4, "

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments