High Court · 2025

2. sri. vankudothSakru' S/o Late s'r ' 6i"roatlon' Agriculttire' R/o Bhagyanagar t t 3. sri. Vankudoth Gandhi' Q/9 lqte s1^PL"+il'"'""t:'3'"XT#"1'*lii5: "' 6""ro"tion' Agriculture' FUo Bhagyanagar t' ^!.^, ,r q6 vears 4 Sri. Vankudoth Peekla' sl9 Lilte sil^?f"[vh1'""[:t,.Go#L"lu"Hil]: - 6ituoriion' Agriculture' Rio Bhagyanagar t ^,-^, ,t (^ ve2rs 5. sri. Vankudoth Mansilal, S/o Late- Sri^*""#3*::1,.6?3ij"lorfi5, " S""uoition' Agricultrire' R/o Bhagyanagar t Khammam District' khadmam District' Khanimam District' "'PETlrloNERs AND oi.tri"t, Telangana State' I The State of Telangana' nep" bY its Principal Secretary' Tribal Welfare ' o&uiifi!"ntlbecieiatat' Hvderabad' , The Additional Agent to Government' Bhadrachalam' Bhadradri Kothagudem - 3- The Agency Divisional fficer' Kothagudem' Khammam District' 4. The Tahsildar, Singareni Mandal' Khammam District' 5 Sri Podugu Srinu',S/o Kotaiah" l99d Y1fl"'o"""ii36!1" tflt"?Et}Y^l?"m " drttrknoigu'pu Hamlet of Usirikayatapattt . #;;".", ;" Kotaiah,. 4s"_9 y1f;; ?:fiTj:'T,"4:ffiYn'il?"fli " 6utt"ri-noig'mpu Hamlet of Usirikayatapattt 7. sri Esam Koteswafiao, s/o Papanh" Ase.! j1ii1i,,,ff::t1ll8l,s?'133'H5, ' Hit crttirindigumpu Hamlet of usirikayalapar Khanimam District' Khammam District' Khammam District' l i i I I I I ! ' ;,!-:s!Ei#i,*r,f#,ft:,:!1 :?',31?ft$g,$Ilfl,vi,"?,,?i,B?lliL.ip,iililxl,i; Khammam Distiict. n .S/o Buchaiah, Ased Major, occupation. i;,.,S',,',1?Iflr[t n,n"rroli, ki",,i,i,,'"il:ii;1prr"m Hamlet of usirikayirapaii;iriir;s":tilL:.#; 'o iln"f;Ll'3Tflf*",#3!' s/o. veeraiah, ns"9 v.ejqr occupation Hamtet of UsiritiyatapJtii,v-iittg"I Silil;E,;i "Y,i*'*""' Mandat, Khammam oirtri,JLprru, " il,.fliliifl'Jfu Anantharamulu, 9/o Puttaiah, Rse.d Major, occupation. Hamtet of Usirit<a/ar-paiiii,iri;si Sii,6Xl; Mandat, Khammam Di.tri5.prrm petition under Articte 226 of theConst*ution of tndia "j:rTl::T: circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents-2 to 4 in threatening to evict the petitioners from the lands admeasuring Act-00 Gts. in sy. No,837/5, Ac.0-30 Gts. in Sv. No.837/13, Ac.1-.r6 Gts., in sy. No.837/.r5, Ac.1-00 Gts., in Sy. No.83Zl12, Ac.1_ 39 Gts. in Sy.No.837t3and Ac.2.1OGts. in Sy. No.837/9, ail situated at Usirikayarapari virage, Singareni Mandar, Khammam District, belonging to the Petitioners, inspite of the pendency of the Revision petition filed by the petitioners before the 'r st Respondent, which was fired against the order dated 14-03-2022 passed by the 2rdRespondent in cMA Nos. 20,21 ,22.23 and 25/2017 dismissing the craim of the petitioners, as arbitrary and iregar, contrary to the Principres of Naturar Justice and viorates the Articres, 14,21 and 300_4 of the constitution of rndia and consequentry direct the Respondents to not to evict the Petitioners from the above said lands by suspending the orders dated 14.03.2022 in Clr/A Nos. 2.10, 21 , 22, 23 and 2St2O17 on the fite of the 2nd Respondent, ti, the disposar of the Stay petition fired in the Revision petition fired by the Petitioners. i I 1 I I i I i : lA NO: 1 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pteased to directtheRespondents-2to4nottoevictthePetitionersfromthelands admeasuring Ac1-00 Gts. in Sy' No'837/5' Ac'0-30 Gts''in Sy No 837/13' Ac'1-16 Gts., in Sy. No.837/15, Ac'1-00 Gts', in Sy' No 837/12' Ac'1-39 Gts in Sy.No.837/3andAc.2.10Gts'inSy'No'837/9'allsituatedatUsirikavalapalli village, Singareni Mandal, Khammam District' belonging to the Petitioners' by suspending the order daled 14-3-2022 passed in CtvlA Nos 20' 21 ' 22' 23 and 2512017 by the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms'V'SMITHA' rep'' SRI GUGULOTH SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondents No"lto3 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondents No'4 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No'sto 11 : SRI G'SHANKAR NAIK The Court made the following: ORDER ,1\ THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETTTION No. 18526 OF ORD ER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is talen up for disposal at the stage of admission. 2. This Writ petition is frled under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following retef: -- , #;;.," ;",::;:l',;ll;ifl:'jJl1l.Y.1,, ?'0". or direction, more particurarry one in rhe declarins lhe action of the hespondents 2 to 4 in threarenins t, ,t,;; ,';:';':*t, sv N. ariis.";'r'r;'l','.'lT:'l:'ijTI jl: rild,".ldl"asuring Ac r-oo c," i" 3,'f.i';;,,1. "l;i'"i,',',11,,' l::i;*^gli-,: 3i iq13r?[: ']:'fl:r:,'Jt* i; ar usrrrkayatapa i Vilaoe Si"e"r""i- -M-;";.i. Kir_nlr- tj tle Petilioners inspite"of the ;*;;";;;;: ";;;: Revisron perrrron r,r.a u" iJ"8^to n ha, g" i. ;i' i;.' ;;.:'.'j:"TX':i1"";1"t:: the i " Respondent, which was "" 'uzz lrasseo bv thc 2Dd Respondenr in C.M.A.Nos.,tO. 21 ,:2.23 i arbitrarv and ,,,.*rl .""i.I-1i/2o17 dismissrng the claim of tre petitioners, A rr icres r 4., i ;;; j#'^"? ["' i:^:']::'f f : "r Nat u ral j ustice- an;;;;;"*, ;." :i,'",::"# ;' ;l:' *JI :-::I, i{ ;:TX,'i'": :',i:*',ilda con sequ€n uv d i rec t 25/2017 on,hr frre or,n. ',1i3-'o o'r zo,z --iri.oiil"""?:"rfij:"i: td nr.a,n ,r,J *"u,.,"; ;J,lJ;.,;.l"oy:il".ill;,l,llli""j;iT;l:*1".:.:;.kj*:l 3. Heard Ms.V.Smitha, learned counsel representing Sri Guguloth Shankar Naik, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government pleader for Social Welfare appearing for responden t Nos. 1 to 3, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearlng for respondent No.4 and Mr.G.Shankar Naik, learned counsel for respondent Nos.S to 15 .a:/

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, agalnst the order d,ated l4_O3-2O22 passed by 2"d respondent / I 2 in C.M.A.Nos .2O, 21, 22, 2g & 2512017, petitioners preferred Revision before respondent No. 1 vide Memo'No'8O6/TW'LTR/ 2022- | and so far no orders are passed yet' Therefore' she seeks the indulgence of this Court to direct respondent No'l to pass apProPriate orders. 5. Learned Government Pleader for appearing for respondent Nos. I to 3 seeks time stating that appropriate orders would be passed within stipulated time' 6. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel, without going into the merits of the case' this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No' 1 to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, after putting the effected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity of hearing, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Till then, interim order, shall continue' No costs' shall stand closed- Miscell S K. SREERAM URTHY DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,ffRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER 1 . The Pri nclpaI Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departme Telanga na, Hyderabad The Additional Ag ent to Govemment' Bhadrachalam' Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Telangana State. 2 Secretariat,state of

3. The Agency Divisional Officer, Kodhagudem' Khammam District 4- The Tahsildar, Singareni Mandal' Khammam District 5. One CCto SRI GUGULOTH SHAN KAR, Advocate' IOPUCI \ To, t

6. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCTAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] \

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

8. One CC to SRI G.SHANKAR NA|K, Advocate. tOpUCl 9. Two CD Copies. 6) dBSK V,,*,A f t t HIGH COURT DATED:3010612025 ORDER WP.No.18526 of 2024 n {HE S r.i a€ k t: 0 3 sEP 206 o€s,, .'r C rtE <i' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o