✦ High Court of India · 05 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,255 words

...RESPONDENT No. 1/Hyderabad P'S Central Crime Station 2. Sri. D.satyanarayana, S/o. D. Lakshmaiah,-Aged about 60years, Occ Retired - fril Piiriate Servic"-nlo.prot No.83, B-2I lVytri Bhavan, Mothi Nagar' Hyderabad.

3. Muwa Malleshwar Rao, S/o. Late.M.Ramaiah, Aged 62yrs . Occ Retired Emolovee. R/o.Flat No l0l Ganapathi Complex, Navodaya uolony' Yeliarciddyguda. HYderabad ..RESPONDENTNo. 2 & 3/DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS Petition under section 482 o1 Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the c.c.No.184 of 2013 on the file of Xll Addl.Chief lvletropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts' Nampally' Hyderabad and quash the proceedings. l.A. NO: 1OF 2023 Petition under section 482 of cr.P .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in c.c.No.184 of 2013 on the file of Xll Addl.Chief [Vlet'opolitan Hyderabad. Magistrate, City Criminal Cou 1s, Nampally, l.A. NO: 2 OF 2023 Between: 1 sri D satvararayana. s/o rLLakshmaiah, Aged about 6oyears. occ.Retired rrom p Va e iervrce. R/o.plot No.g3. B_2. Mytri Bhav-an Mothi Nagar, Hyderabad

2. Muvva lvla lesh,nzar Rao, s/o. Late.M.Ramaiah Aged 62yr; occ. Retired .En1ploygg R/c Ftat No.10.l Ganapathi Compt"ex, N;;.dr; a;t;.;,/, Yellareddyq uda, Hyderabad. AND 1 L )/e_g.ra Bhrrdra Rao, S/o. JRaghavulu,- Aged about 56years. Occ.Business, R/o-Flat No 10', Swarnasri Resi-dency, 6 pYhase, X.e ff 6-Cofc,ny, K;k;6;i[, Hyderaba,i. ...PETITIONERS/RESpoNDENT No. 2 & 3 2 State of Te anglana. rep Hyderabad. ...RESPONDEN'ITPETITIONER by Public Prosecutor, High Court o,,Judicature at .,.FIESPONDENT Petition un'ler Section 320(6) R/w 482 of cr.p.c prayin,l that in the circumstances sta red rn the lvlemorandum of Grounds of crimina petition, the High court may be preased to permit the petitio ners/resp on c1e n t No. 1 and 2/ defacto complaina rts tr) compounding the offence ursed. 420 406 and 120 (b) of IPC and section 2ti of Ap Apartments (promotion of con:;truction and ownership) Act, i 98,' in cc No. 184 of 2o13 on the file of Xll Addl. chief Metropolitan Magis tra.., city criminar courts, Nampa y, Hyderabacr against the Respo nde nt/Petit ic n erl Accused No. 1 and quash the proceedings. LA. NO: 3 OF 2023 Petition und:r Section 320 (2) Rlw 482 of Cr.p.C prayingy that in the circumstances stat:d irr the Memorandum of Grounds of crinrinar petition, the High court may be ple;rsed to record the compromise in the crl p No. ol 2023 and quash the pro<,eed ngs in cc No. 1 84 of 2013 on the f ire of X, r Addr. chief A/etropolitan Magis rate city criminar courts, NampaIy, Hyderabar:r against the *:\ petitioners/ Accused No. 1 by compounding the offences under section 454 and 380 of IPC ' ' This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Miss. Vladimeer Khatoon, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri E. Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of M/s. P. Sumita for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 tn and CRIMINAL PETITION No.576t oF 2023 coMMQn[ o_RDER: It i I s,ubmitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitionerr; as well as the respondent Nos.2 and 3. that during pendency of the present Criminal petition, the partres have compromi;ed the matter and accordingiy, I.A.Nos.2 a.nd 3 of 2023 havt' ber:n fils4 to record the compromise betwer:n them and to conrporLnd the offences. I \

2. Vicle orrlers dated 25.06.2024 and,24.O1.2025, this Court directed tre parties along with their respectrve colrnsel to appear bcfore the Secretary, High Court Legal ljervices Committee, Hillh Court for the State of Telalgana, Hycierabad, for identifi<,ation and to submit a report. I

3. Purs rant to the above said direction issued b1, this Court, respondent N,r;.2, 3 and the petitioner/accused, two victims have appeared separately and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Comm j11sg, has identified the parties and suhmitted ''-",;l';tt .'- ::..i-.:.'-'1i&;-r::-l -!-:1 EVV,J CRLP_No.6V61_2023 2 reportq, d,ated 09.O7.2024 atd 30.01.2025, respectively and the sarne are placed on record. 4, In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2023 arc allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed arrd the proceedings in C.C.No. 184 of 2Ol3 on the file of XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Maistrate, City Criminal Courts Nampally, Hyderabad, against the petitioner/accused No.l are hereby quashed. Consequently petitioner herein is acquitted in Crime No. 174 of 2071 on the file of C.C.S Police Station, Hyderabad. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. \ To, SD/- T. JAYASREE DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' S TION OFFICER

1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Nampally, Hyderabad

2. The Station House Officer, CCS Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Miss. Vladimeer Khatoon Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to M/s. P. Sumitha, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) VH/PSL % ) l,\ J L\ . .,{ J o o o 2 g fiA,:i 2w (f' t' >,1 l: it - -:,;- zi" HIGH COUIRT DATED: 05tA212025 COMMON CRDER l.A. NO: 2 A,ND 3 OF 2023 IN/AT{D CRLP.No.6761 of 2023 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PET;TION &l--- MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION (Und95 Section 320(6) R/w 482 of Cr'P'C') ... ' - .-.., IN THE HIGH COUiC OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA .,,.,, ,i :rr,l , AT HYDERABAD ' Crl.P.MP.No of 2023 Cr1. P. No IN of 2023 Rao,S/o J'Raghavulu' Between: iJ-.v"er^ ek Aged about 56Years,Occ:Buslness' nTo.rlat No. tdr, Swarnasri Residency'6 Phase' Klp.H.e.c"1""y, Kukatpally,Hyderabad' ^dra And Petitioner/ Accused No 1

1. State of Telangana' rep byPublic Prosecutor' of Judicature at Hvderabad' -Colr.t ... """p";;;;t"N" r7rlva*'bad P's' central crime Station ooyeais,occ:Rel ired from Private Service'

2. Sri. D. Sa ryanarayana,S/ o' D ' Lakshmaiah ' ,c-;; "u""i ii::t'il,:-; ;;e:i,ilr'r Bhavan' Mothi Nagar'Hvderabad' 3.MuwabLMalleshwar Rao' S / o' Late'M Ramaiah' Ased:62vrs Occ: ReLired B'mployee' R/ o'Flat No lOl' a?;:#'.t :;;;r""'N""a'v"' -iolonv'Yellareddvguda' Hvderabad' Respondent No 2 & 3/ Defacto complainants JOINT MEMO FILED BY BOT HTHEP ARTItrS It is submitted tl at the Petitioner herein i'e A1 and the Respondent No'2 & 3/Defacto complainalts were compromised in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated .2J _r2-2or7, cornpromise petition along with MOU and the complaina,ts have no objections for Quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.184 of 2013 on the frle of XII Addi Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' CityCrirninalCourts,Nampally,Hyderabadagainstthe \-' \ Respondent / I 'etil.ioner/Accused no 1 and may be pleased to pass srich order or order s :rs this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in -he interest of Justice and ir th,: circumstances oI the case. Je-.-0-& \ CounseI for Pr titi,rner/A 1 e,/A |R12q Counsel for Rt spondent no.2 & 3 Petitioner/ A-1 Respond n o.2 / Defacto Com IainantNo. 1 lu.fZ.t-<-z p Respondent No.3/ Defacto Complainant No.2 Place:Hyderab rd D ate:2O -O7 -2.a 23

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments