High Court · 2025

Petition unde r Section I51 cPC praying that in t1e c rcurnstances stated in the affidavit fr erl rn support of the petition, the High oourt mey be pleased to direct the respond,: rt No 5 not to harass, interfere into rranagen rent of the wakf lnstitution and res rain the petitioner from discharging the rt:ligir r_rs duties being the Sajjadanasher>r1 sn6 IVlutawalli of the Wakf lnstiiution r.c., i.e., Dargah Hazrath Syed {iha r Raza saheb Qibla and Hazrath syed Arnrul ah shah saheb Qibla at tt/oghalpr- -:r with attached properties e) rakiya Hazrarl Syed Amrullah shah Saheb and ir t:ached properties at Kumarwadi outs ide Tala b tvlir Jumla (3) Dargah Zohrar Be. saheba with pucca waranda r;ituated at Kumarwadi Hyderabad., pendirrr; disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.M.QURESHI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.,l TO 5: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI FARHAN AZAM k:HAN, S() FOR TSWB Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI MOHD. IMTIAZUDOIN StDDIQUE SMT. SALEHA BEGUM, ,qDVOCt,,TE The Court made th: following: ORDER ---------------- .-*.lr-fi$GQ\r' " .."2 -.;r.+ *rY ;- f r{. -.. I THE HON,BLE SRI WSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR U/RIT PETITION No.18O 16oF. 202s ORDER: Heard Sri A.M. Qureshi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Smt. Saleem Begum, iearned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5, Sri Farhan Azam Ktran' learned Counsel appearing for respondent No'6, Sri Mohd' Imtiazuddin Siddique, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No 7 and withtheConsentoflearnedCounselappearingfortheparties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the Sft respondent is conLinuously harassing and interfering with the functionsofWakfinstitutionsie',DargahHazrat]nsyedShah Raza Saza Saheb Qibla and Hazrath Syed Amruliah Shah Saheb Qibla with attached properties and preventing the petitioner from discharging religious duties being the Sajjadanasheen and Mutawalli like Fateha and also performance of rituals also interfering with the iife and liberty of the petitioner by orally summoning the petitioner at the behest of respondent No'7' 2 r',,'"' I whicL iacri,r'r of the respondents, it is contended iLs l_r ghly illegal anrl ultr:r,'rres ar-rd infringement of fundamental rightr.

3. ()r-r lrr:half of the petilioner it is contencle<l ti_r. tt through the prrrr crrrlrng dated OA.O4.2024 issued by the ,rrh re:spondent has lrcel suspended by this Court by rts or,ler dated 16.04.!1()i,5 in I.A. No.1 of 2O2S in W.p. No.11293 of :2025. the 6111 respon!ent continues to claim that the pr:litroner suspetrcl,:r, f rr his illegal activities and is causin[] unr)ecessary interft::er rtr: c in Masjid management of Dargth Haz;.lrth Syed Shah l?az:r laza Saheb eibla and Hazrath Syed Amrullah Shah Saheb ()ibla and lodged a compliant on 22.04.2025 ri.r th the 5n responcent and the Sft respondent on the basis of the ,foresaid complaini is ir-rterfering with the religious actjr.itics of the petitior t:r 1S

4. Fe,r crntt.a, learned Government plerldcr ic r Home appearine <;r br:half of respondents would subnrit rhar: ;ince the 66 rescor:d::rt had approached the respondenl allthorities and lodged rr i:c rr tlaint, the authorities have registerec a ( a.sc uid_e investigaticrL. I he authorities have called the pet rtior,er, I I J ,,;, Learned Government Pleader for Home further submits 5. that if the 6h respondent withdraws the complaint' the authorities would close the crime and would not interfere in the religious activities.

6. Sri Farhan Azam Kinan, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.6 has placed before this Court a letter dated 26.06.2025 addressed by the 6m respondent to the 56 respondent informing that the complaint dated 22 'O4 '2025 is being withdrawn by them and requested the sth respondent not to take further action in the matter'

7. A copy of the aforesaid letter addressed by the 6s respondent to the 5ft respondent is placed before this Court and the same is taken on record Since, the 6fr respondent by the letter dated 26'06 2025 8 has withdrawn the comPlaint grven earlier on 22.04.2025, th,ts Court is of the view thal the respondent authorities are to be directednottointerferewiththereligiousactivitiesbeing performed by the petitioner herein g. Subject to the above, direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs' I I I I I i \ To

1. 2 4 5 Ct 7 B i. 4 , N4 j ;: :[aneous petitions, if any, pending rrr the Writ Petil_ior . sL all stand closed. //TRUE COPY/i sd/- A. SREI;INIVASA REDDY ISTI\NT REGISTRAR SF SECTION OFFICER

11.',g prin6i6ral Secretary, Home Department' Office ilt' S3cre ariat' Hyderabad' State of Tdla nqana, T.G. i;;til;;;lilei'oiiotice, Hvderabad office at tloacl No 12' Bhavani Nagar. I3arrlerra Hills. Hyderabad, Telangana- The DepLrt" - ommrssroner 6iFoii"J. Sd'tn Zone. ctffict' at ( ;hatta Bazaar ' pathar if alii lvderabad. rf,J [."1.ti,i,, iJii.irrion., of potice, chatrrnaka.t)ivision. ]ffice at Beside crr!;;i;;; ii""ument, Navapool tvladina to Charmirar ih;'si;il,'roriebtiicer' rt[ogh'ipJi' Police Stati3n' []ulta n shahi' lVloqhalpLrrir''lyderabad. Telanqana' t'n"e,tIi;i il u,Jrtiu" bni""r,'iiYi'g;n' sate wakf $e; rd I laj Houe Building' Riizit< t',tarz,t Nampally,Hvderabad T G -sA[EliA bi'" cc; ii s,rtrr deouH,l' Advocate [oPtJCl ;;; dt;; j,itlP ron-HorrtrE, rligh Court for thb state-of relansana' at Hvderabad IOUTl e d,nl Ct;i; s;hr Fnhnnu AZAM KHAN. sc ror rswB [r]PU ol io 5ii" cd i; a;ii MonD lrurlAZUDDlN, Advocate IoPUC] .1 1.Two CD !o1:ies- PSK. MP Y U- HIGH COUI?T DATED:2710612025 ORDER WP.No.18016 of 2025 C,K TllE s'i ( 4 () I []3,,/t * a- |ns E f .(. '' . I 'r.' ' ii:, i:-:... .: DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \+ i\:r'""' ----)- , -