Sri Sai Communication v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
affidavit, filed in support thereof, the application is allowed, The Station
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 482
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Sri Sai Communication, Rep. by lt4.Chandra Kumari W/o lvl.P. Koteswar Rao, Plot No.5, Mega City No.14, Sunder Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad 2. Koteswara Rao S/o M.P.Dharma Rao, Plot No.5, Mega City No.14, Sunder Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad ...Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 (Petitioner in CRLP 5120 OF…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI IA No. l OF 2019 IN CRLP NO: 5120 OF 2OOO Between:
Sri Sai Communication, Rep. by lt4.Chandra Kumari W/o lvl.P. Koteswar Rao, Plot No.5, Mega City No.14, Sunder Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad 2. Koteswara Rao S/o M.P.Dharma Rao, Plot No.5, Mega City No.14, Sunder Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad ...Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 (Petitioner in CRLP 5120 OF 2000 on the file of High Court) AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by Spl.P.P. for SPE ACB Cases, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hydera bad .. . Respondent (Respondent in-do-) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,, praying that in the circumstances stated ln the petition filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition that "they should surrender their passports before the CBI, SPE, Hyderabad" imposed in Crl.P.No. 5120 of 2000 dated t9/L2/2000 passed by this Honourable Court and direct the Station House Officer, CBI and SPE cases, Hyderabad to release the passports of the petitioners bearing No.
T 192937 issued on dated l0/lL/L994 and No. f 777568 issued on 22/09/7994 issued by the Passpo rt Officer, Chennai. CRLP NO: 5120 OF 2OO0 Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to release the petitio ner/Accused on bail in the event of his arrest in crlme FIR No.RC 17(s)/2000-CBI/Hyd, on the file of XXIII 14etropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed therein, and the order of the High Court dated 19.12.2000 made in Crl.P and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Nageshwara Rao Pappu, Advocate for. the Petitioner and of Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, The Court made the following ORDER This I.A. is filed under Section 482 Cr,P.C, seeking to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.P.No.S120 of 2000, yide order dated 19.12,2000, to the effect that the petitioners/accused Nos,1 and 2 shall surrender their passports before the CBI, SPE,, Hyderabad.
Operative part
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners intend to visit U.S.A. to attend the house warming ceremony of their son proposed to be held in the first week of February, 2O2O and hence, prayed to allow this petition, ) In view of the above and having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit, filed in support thereof, the application is allowed, The Station House Officer, C.B.I & S.P.E. Cases, Hyderabad is directed to return the respective passports of the petitioners, l/rRUE coPYll sd/- cH. vENKATESWARLU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Up SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The I Additional [4etropolltan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad The Station House Officer, CBI, SPE, Hyderabad Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT) One CC to SRI Nageshwara Rao Pappu Advocate [OPUC] One CC to $rl K.Surender Spl. P.P. for CBI Cases IOPUC] One spare copy HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:11/ L2/2OL9 ORDER IA No. 1 OF 2019 IN CRLP NO: 5120 OF 2OOO DIRECTION ^'s .l\s' -o:
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: affidavit, filed in support thereof, the application is allowed, The Station
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 438, 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 11 Dec 2019. The bench was G SRI DEVI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.