The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to STAY all the proceedings rn crime No.580 of 2022 tn the court of the ll Additional IVletropolitan Magistrate, cyberabad at Malkaigirr for the of{ences under section 376 (2)(n), a17,420,493 lPC, 3(2)(va) SC/ST POA Act in the above case' l.A. No. 2 and 3 oF 2O25 Between: Gundu Krishnaveni, D/o. Gundu Laxmaiah Aged about 26 years, Occ: Software, R/o. H.No.2-24-10111/B/1 , Road No.4, Laxmi Narayana Colony, IDA Uppal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Telangana State ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/De-Facto Complainant AND

1. The State of rerangana, Rep by pubric prosecutor Hir h court of rerangana State Hyderabad 2 pasunuri Nasarajuna, S/o 0..";;l,i?'"i$"J'X;i'i1rt;'V:::j"8331 Pvt Employee, R/o LIGB-i 33, Dr.AS Rao Nagar, -ClL, Secunderabad, Telangana State ...Responder Upetitioner/Accused Petrtion under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying thal n the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, 1r High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to compromise /compor rd thL matter with the Respondent No.2 in crime No.5B0 of 2022 in the court rf the ll Additionar Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at lvlalkajgiri . = Prayer in l.A. N o.3 oF 2025 -crrr Petition under section 359 (2) of BNSSS praying that in th<: :ircumstances stated in the l\/emorandum of Grounds of criminal petrtio;, the High ( ourt may be pleased to record the compromrse by quashing the proceedings in e No.5tio of'2022 n the court of the rr Additionar Metroporitan Magistraie, cybe r rbad at Nllarkalgi, in view of the compromise between the petitioner and respondenls No.2 herein. - This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [/rer.r >randum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the argume-nts of s.i B chandra Shekar Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners and sri Jithender fl ro Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 i nd sri Azaz Ahmed, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.7907 ot 2025 COMM ON ORDER l.ThisCriminalPetitionisfiledbythepetitioner/accusedunder Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha (BNSS)' 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No'580 of 2022 on the file of the learned ll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2Xn), 417, 420,493 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) oftheScheduledCastesandScheduledTribes(Preventionof Atrocities Act), 2015.

2.ltissubmittedbylearnedcounselforthepetitioner/accused as well as the respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences' J The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise Petition t I I .- \ .i-. *- ., ( ll P 7902 202i

4. Since the parties were willing to enter int: compromise, they were given a chance to setfle the mafter by agrl earing along with their respective counsel before the High Corr, t Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde ordersr jaled 27.06.2025 passed by this Court, The Secretary, High Cou t Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a ro )ort to that effect. 5. pursuant to the above said direction issued i y this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have app, rared before the High Courl Legal Services Committee for the State rr Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identifieo he parties and submitted a report dated .l 1.O7.2OZS stating that tF I parties were identified and they have wiilfufly, without any coerci,) r. entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2t areallowed. Consequenfly, the Criminal petition is allowed and th( proceedings in Crime No.5B0 of 2022, on the file of the learneri ll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, regir; :red against are hereby quashed subject to t re petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five lhousanrl Only) to the High Court Bar Association and Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Fir/, I Thousand the petitioner/accused \ 3 ('.r.1' 7907 2025 Only) to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of same before the Registry

7. lVliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed Sd/. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER I, 1 2 3 4 6 The ll Additional lVletropolitan lvlagistrate. Cyberabad at The Station House Officer, Kusaiguda Police Station, Rachakonda. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT) One CC to Sri B Chandra Shekar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Azaz Ahmed, Advocate IOPUC] Two CD Copies lkajgiri To, t Sa/PS I (Along with a copy of Joint tMemo) NOTE : Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri B Chandra Shekar Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 29.08.2025 as Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and Rs. 5,0001 (Rupees Five thousand only) to The High Court Legal Services Committee and filed lvlemo as proof of compliance USR No. 9386 of 2026, dated 28-01-2026. t I HIGH COURT DATED: 29lOAl2O25 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.7907 of 2025 I IESrA .J (r , .i'l (, * *, .,.o ' :r).ti'^\a ALLOWING LA.Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2O2S AND CR|M|NAL pETll tON A. ME*',ou$,RH."'13S#jH'.',i#1"-. rN THE rr.o lot* 'oot* ) IN I.A.No. *E OFTELANGANA oF 2o2s cnr,.r.No@)orzozs BetrYccn ;il;;, N:^'1,:1,; "4.7", ;ff :#iil.., t,-"'",-1tH: ii : ;;: H R"" N a gar' Ec tL' 'strna"*u"a' ft lan gana State' AND the state of Telangna ,T,"J.:iX,X'ii"':ili'*,'#l'""' I 2 Petitioner/Accused $,r*rut#u,ffi ........ ResPondents No'1 & i Pii o R & RE SPo N o.2 in above Quash Petition seeking to 0 of 2022 in the court of the Hon'ble abad at Malkajgiri for the ofi'ences IPC, 3(2)(va) SC/ST POAAct JOI NT MENto FILEDBY Ma i.W Ie ase YourII onour e submitted that the petitionot filed gs in Crime No'58 quash the Proceedin Magistrate, CYber II Addl.MetroPolitan under section 316 Q)(n),417,420,493 2. we submitted that subsequently on the elders of both famil IES, the Petitioner/Acc No.2 / de-facto complainant according presence o marital life intervention of well-wishers and used has married the resPondent to Hindu Rites and customs ln f the relatives and elders on i 1.08.2022 and leading haPPY )

3. We submitted that the petrtioner/Accused was i bie to resolve their differences with the lamily of the respondent _r-c 2 and the petitioner /Accused and the respondent No.2 are living under I re roofat LIGB-I33. Dr.AS Rao Nagar, ECIL, Seiunderabad, Telangan r State and continuing happy life together.

4. We submitted that the petitionel and respondent Nc. have filed a petition seeking the Honble Court tr.l record the comp r rmise. The contents mentioned in the said compromise pctition are true a r I correct to the best of our knou,ledge and belief. The said compromise is ntered with fi-ee will and consent and without any coercion. Hence, lv< ile filing the present joint Memo. a It is thcrefore prayed that tlris Honble Court ma1 be pleased to record the compromisc permitting thc petitioner and resp I rdent No.2 herein to compound the offences rvith the respondent No.2/ Petitioner herein by recording compromise and by:rllowing the CriminlLt petition filed by the petitioner against in Crime ].{o.580 of 2022 in the cc rt of the l{on'ble II Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malka.i5 i i and pass such other order or orders as this I'Ionblc Court may deem 1t and proper in thc circumstances of the case. I{YDERABAD Dt2+-06-202-< nJt"P lPetitioner G i '1 -i;d,,,l*t Re:;1 ondent No.2 Co the oet oner lutl- Counsel for the I espondent No.2 I