High Court · 2025

Smt. Kummara Umavathi, w/ Occ. Household r/o H.No. 1 Hyderabad. oLa 0-26 K.Sudershan aged about 55 years, Near Sai Baba Temple, Badangpet, AND 1

2. J. ela nga n a rep bv tS T e State of T h s Department B d u te of Telanga Th e Sta Secretariat, Hderabad. The Accountant General, Telangana P Secre ta rIa H na rep ...PETITIONER ncipal Secretary, Transport, Roads and erabad ncipal Secretary, Finance Department yderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the C nstitution of lndia praying that in the therewith, the High Court may be or Direction, more particularly one in circumstances stated in the affidavit fil pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Ord the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring he inaction of the respondent No.2 in issuing necessary orders for release of the entire monetary benefits including the pending medical bills pertaining to the late husband of the petitioner who retired from service as Lift Operator in the '1'1 r pondent department on attaining the age of superannuation dl.31l3l2O24 and died on 71412024 while undergoing treatment inspite of the written represe tation dt. 271512025 and 916/2025 followed by personal visits, as being illegal arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional ent to release the entire monetary and consequently direct the 2nd respon benefits including the medical expenses p rtaining to the deceased husband of the petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 herein to consider and pass orders on the representations dt. 27 _S_2O25 and 9-6-2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. S. PRASAD BABU Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR TRANS,ORT, ROADS AND BU,LD,NGS Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR FINANCE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M. MURLAI KRISHNA, SC FOR A&E The Court made the following: ORDER l i i l l I { ,.ri t*r, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAV PU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITI ON No.l79 L of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri S. Prasad Babu, learne counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader or Transport, Roads and Buildings Department appearing for spondent No. l, learned Government Pleader for Finance appearin for respondent No_2 and Sri M. Murali Krishna, learned Srandin counsel [t_r r Accou ntanr General appearing for respondent No.3 d pcrused the material available on record.

2. The case of the petitioner is that th petitioner's husband Sri K.Sudershan worked as Lift Operator in thc Ist respondcnt Department and he discharged his dutie sincerely and diligentty without any complaint or adverse remar s during his tcnure of service. The date of retirement of petition r's husband on attaining the age of superannuation was 31 03-20 4 and unfortunately he suffered with "Periampullary Carcinoma" nd admitted at Global Hospitals, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad and u denvent treatmcnt from l-4-2O24 to 7-4-2024 and inspite of the be t treatment, pctitioner,s husband could not survive and ultimately ied on 7 -4-2024, leaving behind the petitioner, son and two daughter \ \:- 2 3' The petitioner further submits that after u're dcmise of the petitio,er's husband, the petitioner has submitted rclevant medir.ar reports an<1 requestcd to release the mcdical bills which thc pctitioner has spcnt for the trcatment of her husband and also ielevant documents before the l st respondent, who is the emplo.y.cr of thc deccased for rcleasc of the entire retirement ber-refits, but even afte r receipt of the entire documents, the 1st respondent <jid not respond anrl upon persistent visits and requests, adviscd tl,rc pctitioncr to rcprescnI before the 2nd respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thc petitioncr made a reprcscntation clatecl O9.06.2025, before the 2nd respondent, for release ol'the entire monetary benehts of her latc l,rusband, but the respondcnts clid not cotrsider the same till today. Aggricved by thc same , th('petitioner filed the present writ petition.

5. Learncd Govcrnment pleader for the respondcnts submits that they hirve no objection to consider and dispose of Lhc representation dated 09.06.2O25, submitted by the petitioner, rvithin a stipulated time and pass appropriate orders, in accordance witl,r law.

6. Having considered the submissions made by the lc:rrnecl counscl lor itoth thc parties, the 2nd respondcnt is directcd to 3 consider the representation dated 09

06.2025, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orde s in accordancc u,ith law, within a period ol eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above direction, this W it Petition is disposed o[, at the admission stage itself. No order as t As a sequel, miscellaneous applic tions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed /TTRUE C PY// M. OSMAN ALI BAIG TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1

2. J, 4 5 Cl 7 6 p p T T n fa Sport e a h P ncl pa Secretary n a T e S H yde abad Secr D Th e Pf ncl a Secretary Fi na T e Acco U nta n G enela Te h BABU one cC to SR S PRASAD T o CCS to G P Fo R TRAN SPoR T e Stat of Tel a nsan a H yd eta Two cCS to G FoR F NANcE H s 3I1"S"3?.' S?Y1 r,*., ^*'" Two CD CoPies P a h R ads and Buildings Department' 'Hderabad rtment Secretariat, T S vderabad. iocate [OPUC OADS AND BL,ar,*oa, Hish court d IOUTI -c'ourt fi,r tne State of Telangana' at SC [OPUC] BM TJ HIGH COURT DATED:2610612025 ORDER WP.No.17911 of 2025 c l. t+ IUE zffi (\ z 1 -l'7,/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE ADMISSION STAGE WTTHOUT COSTS \7.-