1. C. Jayashree v. 1. The State of Telangana

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constatution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stbted in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus a) declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.2 in not fixing the reflts at the rate of Rs.2.501 per Sft., per month as per the G. O. Ms .No' 178 d1.23-O4-201O of theist Respondent herein without considering the representations of the petitioners dt.29-01-2015, 22-O9-2OO15 and 17-03-2016 and claiming higher rents from the petitioners herein, which is against the above said G.O. as arbitrary, illegal, irregular, unconstitutional and vr( Iative of the above G.O. and violative Art.14 of the Constitution of lndia b) cors;quently direct the Respondent No. 2 to collect the rents as fixed by the 1" Respondent vide G.O.Ms.No.178 dL23-O4-201O, c) and direct the 2nd Resporc -'nt not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners shops Nos.16,1 and 2'l of the petitioners 1 2 and 3 respectively, which are under the control of Gadvr I Municrpality, 2nd Respondent herein i.e., Gadwal Municipality, Jogulam I r District Gadwal (Mahaboob Nagar District). |.A.NO: 1 OF 201 6(WPMP. NO:479 ss oF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirl rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m'r be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to the impugned notice N,r A1479912016 dL28' 10- 2016 & 01-11-2016 issued for shop Nos.'16, land 2t belonging to the petitioners 1 to 3 herein respectively including the eviction (,1 the petitioners from the above said shops pending disposal of the above writ pet t )n. l.A.NO:2 OF 2016 (WPMP. NO:4851 I oF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci (umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 rnay be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in tl e nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the allotment Proceedings No. D/SMI / .58612012, dt.24-08- 2012 lor shop Nos.16, 1, 24 of the petitioners 1 to 3 r:;pectively as illegal, arbitrary, irregular and violative of G.O.Ms.No.178 dL23.O4.2O1O, rlw G.O.Ms.No.116 dt.01-02-2008 of the 1st Respondent. |.A.NO:3 OF 2016 (WPMP. NO: 49705 OF 2016) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High. Cortr may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in le nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the auction Proceedings No. UBS/4t t 612012-13 of the 2nd Respondent for shop Nos. 16,1,24 of the petitioners 1 to 3 respectively as illegal, arbitrary, irregular, and violative of G.O.Ms.No. 178 dt 23'04'2O1O, tlw G.O.Ms.No. 1 16 dt. 01 .02.2008 of the 1st Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K.RAMANUJA CHARI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER HON'BLE SRI JTISTICE LAXMI NARAYANA AI-t |HETTY WP.No.38912 of 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following srr rstantive relief "... to issue on order or direction more particularly .: rc it1 the noture o.f writ of Mandamus declaring the inac t tit q[ the Respondent No.2 in not fixing the rents at the ,.r te of Rs.2.50 paise per Sft per month ds per the (:.'). Ms.No. lTU dt 23 04.2010 of the l" Respondent hc., i,t x,itltout considering the representations of ke petitioners dt 29.01.2015 and 22.09.2015 c td 17.03.2016 and claiming higher rents from he peliliotrcr.\ lrcre iu y,ltich is against the above said t, t) us arbilran, illegal irregular unconstitutional t qd violative o-/' the above G.O. and violative Art t 4 ol he Constitulion of India and conseqtrcntly d,r tct Respondenl No 2 to collect the rents as fixed by th: i', Respondent vide G.O.Ms.No.t78 dt 23.04.2010 tnd further, lo tlirect 2'd Respondent not to take any cot:t t've sleps again.st the petitioners shops Nos.l6. I and ), of the petilioners t, 2 and 3 respectively which are ut l,:r the control oJ' Gadual Municipatity-2nd Respotit. t,tt herein, i.e., Gctdwal Municipality, Jogulamba Dis r ,L:t, Gadwal l{cthaboob Nagar District. " z No representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2 LNA, J WP.No.389l2 of 2016

3. Sri Krishna Reddy Putta, leamed Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, on written instructions, submitted that respondent No.2 has been collecting rents in accordance with GO.Ms.No. l7g, dated 23.04.2003, in compliance with the inrerim orders of this Court dated 06.12.2016, and therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition.

4. Recording the said submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

5. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No cosls. Sd/.S. MALLIKARJUNA ASSISTANT REG R Sb-'- F{AR ,/ //TRUE COPY// To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPLADMN AND URBAN Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [O

2. One CC to SRI K.RAMANUJA CHARI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate [oPUC] 4. Two CD Copies SECTION OFFICER LOPMENT, High SA/OAN HIGH COURT DATED:1411112025 I ORDER WP.No.38912 of 2016 -i tos t,{ - S I/,J ( .J o r').,. I , 1 ., r.r,- trli z C)\ t r.ravlt o DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. KS >z[z[ze