Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- E V VENUGOPAL
Outcome
Dismissed
Criminal Petition is dismissed as infmctuous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the a-foresaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infmctuous granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet if they so chooses. Miscellaneous applications, if arIy pending, shall also stand closed. /ITRUE COPY'I ( Sd,. L. LAKSHM SSISTANT REGI A I…
Judgment
Cause title
2. Srihari Gaddameedi, S/o. Late- Narayana, Aged 59 years, Occ. Doctor, R/o. H.No.6-2-59, Shivaii Nagar, Sangareddy, Telangana. ...RespondenUDefacto4omplainant Petition under Seclion 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash-the FIR No. 1 of 2022 on the file of Women P.S. Sangareddy. l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 1 ol 2022 on the file of Women P.S. Sangareddy. f This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Glounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri D Madhava Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri E.Ganesh, Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER I i I I THE HONOI'RABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL - CRIMIN AL PETITION No.4997 of 2022 /
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is hled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the petitioners/ accused Nos.2 and 3, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in F'l'R'No' 1 of 2022 on the file of Women Police Station, Sangareddy District' registered for the offence punishable under Sections 4g8-A,417,323 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act' I I 2 3 No representation on behatf of the petitioners Mr.E.Ganesh, learned Assistalt Public Prosecutor by furnishing a copy of e-courts proceedings would submit that after completion of investigation in the subject crime, the police filed charge sheet before the Court concerned and it was numbered as Calendar Case and nothing survives in this Criminal Petition for I 2 adjudication. Hence, he seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous.
Operative part
Recording the a-foresaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infmctuous granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet if they so chooses. Miscellaneous applications, if arIy pending, shall also stand closed. /ITRUE COPY'I ( Sd,. L. LAKSHM SSISTANT REGI A I BABU STRAR SECTION OFFICER To, The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate' at S gareddY The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, SangareddY One CC to Sri D M Two CCs to Public Hvderabad. (OUT) Two CD CoPies adhava Rao' Advocate [OPucl Prosecutor, H igh Court for the State of Telangan
2 J 4 5 YIR/PIP ,-, n( rr- ) ) HIGH COURT DATED:2410212025 I i I l ORDER CRLP.No.4997 ot 2022 -r HE S r,l 6 ( 3- 01 t,rAy 2025 O5sPAtcH gO 1(( > 2 C I .+ DISMISSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS. +q (7< 1) ) rx-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Petition is dismissed as infmctuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.