Shaik Kattubadi Malammad Mustafa v. District
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITIO N NO:1 9408 0F 2023 Between: Shaik Kattubadi Malammad Mustafa, s/o. shaik Katubadi saftar sab, Aged --CunJiu'p"ntu, about 62 _Years, O_cc. Business, Rl/o. 1_93_1 , M,in norO, Anantapur District. TS. AND ...PET|T|ONER District. 1 I!:_9Jllg gf Telangana,. Rep by its principat Secretary, Home Depa(ment, _ sgcretanat, I elangana, Hyderabad 2. The Commissionei of. PoliLe, Cyberabad, Telangana. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of pblice, Shamshab"ad Division, Hyderabad 4. The station House officer, Rajiv Gandhi Intemational Airport police station, _ Shamshabad, Cyberabad, Telbngana. 5. Khaja Moinuddiri, Sio. Abdul Kha"der Sab, Aged about 52 years. Occ. B usi ness, R/o. H. Nol^B- 1 2 - 4 1 g I O t 1 7 b6,-Hafeez fjaOa frf agii, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad TS.
6. Mohd. Aiyazuddin, slo..-tf.tqq Moinuddin Aged about 28 years, occ. Business. Rr/o. H.No 1g-12-419tot1756, Hafeez BabI Nagar, einoiaguda, itA"*b;; TS. 7 lr-"lq GJrayazuddin Ahmed. @.Chotty. Sio, Khaja Moinuddin Aged about 28 years, Ucc Business, RIo, H. No.1g-12 _4191011756, Hafeez Ba6a Nagar, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad. TS ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not registering the FIR against respondent No.S to 7 pursuant to the petitioners private complaint vide sR No.91212023 on the file of Xll Addl Metropolitan Magistrate as illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct respondent No.4 to register FIR against respondents 5 to 7 and take up the investigation there of pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interests of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 to register the crime pursuant to the private complaint vide SR.No.912i2023 made by the petitioner against respondents 5 to 7 and take up the investigation thereof pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice.and equity. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt S.M.SAIFULLAH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: Gp FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.S TO 7: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE TION'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT P N No.194O ol 2023
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Narsimhulu Neeli, learned counsel representing Sri S.M.Saifullah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. SD/.P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// . 9n" 99 to SRt S.M.SA|FULLAH, Advocate tOpUCt . Two CCs to Gp FoR HoME, His'h C;;; f"ril; Eirie of retansana, ar Hyderabad. [OUTI . Two CD Copies sEcnmk;R To 1 2 3 PSK. LS HIGH COURT P DATED:21 10412025 ORDER WP.No.I9408 of 2023 GLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS / /:l / /5 ,/2 4 IF.E S f.( c.\o a 6 (. t,) 2 6 niiy ZIZS ('( \. z, ',. I .i.,-rf:a t
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.