Shaik Hidayathulla and four others v. Commissioner, Rural development, 5th Floor, Insurance Buildings, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Dec 2008
- Bench
- C V NAGARJUNA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the petitioners:
Sri M.Srinivasa Rao. (In both the cases) Counsel for the respondents: None. (in both the cases) This Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER:-
These two Writ Petitions are filed seeking regularization of the services of the petitioners in the respondent-Organization. In view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi1) and reiterated by a three Judge Bench in Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand and others2) the petitioners, who are working only on daily wage basis, have no legal right to seek regularization of their services unless the employer frames a scheme for such regularization. Both the Writ Petitions are, therefore, dismissed. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:29-12-2008 MNR
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Dec 2008. The bench was C V NAGARJUNA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.