✦ High Court of India · 05 Dec 2025

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited vs Bollineni Baby Rani and another

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Dec 2025
Length
1,490 words

Judgment

1. Bollineni Ba wife, R/o. H - District-500 035 by Rani, No.19-1 Wo B.Rambbabu Naid^u, Aged 43 years, Occ. House -- 3, Bhagatsingh Nagar, Saro6rnagai Ran'ga Reddy

2. Bollineni Rambbabu Naigg,. s/o M_ohan Naidu, Ageo. 52 years, occ. Nil, R/o. H.No. 1 9-1 3, Bhagatsingh Nagar, Saroornigii, ningJ neoov biitnct_soo oss. . .. Res pondents/petitioners 3. M/s sandhu Roag Lines pvt Ltd, Rept. by its Authorized signatory, R/o. DtB, wing 1st Floor, chakan, pune, futaharashtra staie-+To-soi r' '" -' -'- 4. Narender sinoh s/o Banta sinqh. Aggd. Majgf, occ. Driver of crime vehicle, R/o. Vill Mahu"a,'r.teir gus stanE,'duroaspur District, punjab state-14s 001. ...Respondents/1 "t and 3'd Respondents --jq.r CROSS OBJE|CTION NO.45 of 2019 Between

1. Bollineni Baby Rani, Wo B.Rambbabu Naidu, Aged 43 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. H.No.19-13, Bhagatsingh Nagar, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District-1100 035.

2. Bollineni Rambbabu Naidu, S/o Mohan Naidu, Aged. 52 Years, Occ. Nil, R/o. H.No.19-13, Bhagatsingh Nagar, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District-S0O 035. ...Cross Objectors/Respondents 1 & 2 AND

1. lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Ltd, Represented by Manager, D.No.6-3-35211,111 Floor, Osman Plaza, Road no.1, Ba Panjagutta, Hyderabad-500 034. its Branch njara Hills, ... RespondenUAppellant

2. M/s :Sandhu Road Lines Pvt Ltd, Rept. by its Authorized Signatory, R/o DlB, Wing 1st Floor, Chakan, Pune, Maharashtra State-410 501. 3. Nare,nder Singh, S/o Banta Singh, Aged. Major, Occ. Driver of crime vehir:le, R/o. Vill [t/ahua, Near Bus stand, Gurdaspur District, Punjab Stak>-145 001. . .. Res pondents/Res pondents lA NO: 2 oF 2019

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of operation of decree and judgment dated 2810112019 in M.V.O.P.No.628 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additionat District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, At L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the main M.A.C.M.A. herein. Counsel for the Appellants in MACMA ^A,nd Respondent in Cross Objections: SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent in MACMA And Cross Otrjectors in Cross Objections: SRI VIJAYALAKSHMI PALADUGU The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD. **** THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. NO.2966 0F 2019 CROSS OBJECTION No.45 of 2OL9 DATE: OS.L2.2O2S M.A.C.M.A. NO.2966 0F 20L6 Between : ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Bollineni Baby Rani and 3 others Versus CROSS OBJECTION No.45 of 2O19 ) ) BeJween : Bollineni Baby Rani and another ICICI Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited Versus Appellant ..Respondents Appellants . .. Respondents ! t I COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

1. No one appears for the appellant

2. The Appeal and the Cross Objection are listed under the heading 'Settled at Lok Adalat'. _j*L i' l 2

3. Thr' disputes between the parties were settled in terms of an Award drted 13.09.2025 passed by the Lok Adalat. Hence nothing r:mains of the Appeal or the Cross Objection.

4. M.l\.C.M.A.No.2966 of 2O19 and Cross Objection No.45 of 2or9, along with all connected applications, are accordingly disposed of. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/- M JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER /TRUE COPYII 1' The C)hairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District ^ J_rdg9 Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar. 2. One CC to Sri H.arinath Reddy Soma, Advocate IOPUCI 3.'one cc to sri Vijayarakshmi paradugu, Advocate topucl 4. Two CD Copies i ,L* To, ABK /PSL \ HIGH CC}URT DATED: 05/1 212025 t l COMMON JUDGMENT MACMA.No.2966 of 2019 & CROSS OBJECTION No.4S of 2019 DISPOSING OF THE MACMA AND CROSS OBJECTION IN TERMS OF AN AWARD PASSED BY THE LOK ADALAT \- \ \ IUnder I l . present:1. Hon,ble Justice G.Sri Devi, ,ttH;Hil9n'ble Hish court ror the state of relangana)

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member MACMANo.2966 of 2019 and Cross Obiection No.45 of 2019 (BeforetheHon'ffi '\.., theChairman,r,[email protected]) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.6ZB of 2O16 the fite of MACMA.N 2966 201e Between:- lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Ltd. Represented by its Branch Manager, D.No.6-3-352/1, lll Ftoor, Osman ptaza, R-oad No. t, Aan;ara Hilts, Panjagutta, Hyderabad-500 034. AND ...Appe I lant/2nd Respondent

1. Boltineni Baby Rani, w/o.B.Rambbabu Naidu, Aged 43 years, occ: House wife, .', R/o-H.No.19'13, Bhagatsingh Bagar, Saroorniga"r, Ranga Reddy District-Sgg 0.3-5. ---' ,'t 2, Bottineni Rambbabu Naidu, S/o.Mohan Naidu, Aged 52 iears, occ: Nitti ,-- ' R/o.H.No.19-13, enagitiingh tt.gur, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District-5oo 035. Il/s ilFl'u RoaQ Line pv-t Ltd., Rept. By its Authorized ;;lillr?:oents/Pelilioners ' , ..,.R/o.DlB,Wing1'!F[oor,Chakan,Pune,MaharashtraState-410501.:,..

4. Narendbr Sing-h, S/o.Banta Singh, Aged: Major, Occ: Driver of crime vehicte, R/o. Vitt Mahua, Near Bus Stand, curoaspui District, eun;-austaiu-i+s-obi. ' , Between:'--

1. Bottineni Baby Rani, w/o.B.Rambbabu Naidu, Aged 43 years, House wife, 2. Boltineni Rambbabu Naidu, s/o.Mohan Naidu, Aged 52 years, occ: Nitt, R/o.H.No. 1g"1:, efiagaiiingh Bugur, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District-S0o 035. :^-:;x :.::,_,:l:. : ,, ', :1i lClcl Lombard General lnsurance Company Ltd. r : Rep. by_its Branchirtanager, D.No.O-l-lSitt, ill Ftoor, AND z:,S1r l?lalu Roadtines pvt Ltd., Rept. By its authorized signatory, ,' '' R/o.DlB, wing 1't floor, chakan, pune, Maharashtr. stite--+rtl6i. ' 3. Narender s!1sn, s-1o.aanta-singh, fseo: Major, occ: Driver of crime vehicte, ' R/o. VlllMahua, Near Bus Stanl,-Gu'rdaspuioistriit, punjab State-1ai001. , Counsel For Respondents/Ctaimants Counse[ for Appettant/ lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, Advocate. Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legat Claims,' .4 I i i Cross Objection having been referred for Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, this Lok Adalat the fottowing award is AWARD -Compensati Awarded by the Tribunal Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Adatat. ><- f.rrt .k rty four Rs.3 ,000/. ( Rupees rty one Respon 16 has with proportionate costs and inferest @ g% p.a. from the date of petition titt thir date of deposit. MACMANo. lnsurance company and cross objection No.45 or z.ol9 has ,been preferred by the petitioners/Ctair:nants against the orders passed'in MVOP No.628 of 2016 by the Tribunat. The Respondent/petitioner/Ctaimant Nos. 1 &. z atong with their counsel and sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, senior Manager - Legat ctaims for the Appettant/rnsurance company have appeared and identified before the Lok Adatat. During the pendency of Appea[ and cross objection, the Respondents/petitioners/ctaimants and Appettant-lnsurance company represented that they have mutuatly entered into compromise and settted the matter. rn pursuance of the same, the Respondents/petitioners/cr.aimants have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.23,4g,000/- (Rupees Twenty three [akhs forty eight thousand onty) in addition to the amount atready deposited by the rnsurance company towards futt and finat setttement of their ctaim and the rnsurance company has agreed to pay the same towards futt and finat setttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the setttement, the rnsurance company shatt pay the above said amount within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this award after deducting the amount that was deposited, in any. rn the event of defautt or detay in making such deposit, the amount payabte shatl carry interest @ g% per annum as awarded by the Tribunal.. apportionment Nos.I & Z siratt be made as per the apportionment determined in MVOP.No.6Z8 of 2016 by the Tribunat. Additional Directior{sI 1. The Appettants are entiiled to the refund of court Fee paid in these appeats. 2'The amount alrea(ry deposired by the rnsurance a";;il;any, shatl be given credit to. ,j"","J,.,r"Tijflllil;l*il:,lHifl:.,i".."#Hh,::" il,;";;nt/petitioner/craimant Nos.1 & 2 are signed ,l?rt""ffilr",t.';",fiijrl?:;the above setttement and award, the parries and their counsel have CrossobjetionNo,[5orzorIstana6;#;:utrtweentnetNWl rn terms of the compromise arrited at between the parties, /vlACrvlA No.2t i.v1': i.:' . "< L,J L .II {'} : I I I I I I I I i I t I I I I I i I lIs; 'a rts-'- H,\ c f?. ,$, Y, 0",f'S i .'- 2?{,tlt7 4f Cii:;'I t:+r:i:- ClR.::+i'31 i: slt * )i? Counsel for Appettant (s) 4 \:,4{" Chairman l. 6 f3o\(?*, E*IJ-L J"-lvuio(/"v ' Counsel for P' Vi4*L \A)--:f, 6zsI SooSooO)_t-r s \ ) Member )

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments