✦ High Court of India · 01 Jul 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 01 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
01 Jul 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,061 words

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ or order or Direction more particurarr, "r"',r",n" nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents more particurarry respondent no'3 in not considering the representations/apprications 2025 submitted by the petitioner to the respondent no.3, in refunding the Bank cha'an dated.26-5-2022 bearing charan No.(ATRN).s369052861025 for an amount of Rs.1,63,ggg/_ submitted towards stamp .ty for registration of Gift Deed' inspite of receipt of the representation/application respondent no.3 did not act upon the same is bad, arbitrary, void, ilegar and against the principles of natural justice and vioration of Articres 14 and300A of dated.2g- 5-2025, dated.2g-5- theConstitutionoftndiaandconsequentlydirecttheRespondentsmore particularly respondent no.3 to process and refund the amounl. of Rs.1,63,999/- to thePetitioner,sbankaccountbearingNo.200g0T56696,stateBankoflndia' Peerzadiguda Branch' within a stipulated period' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to consider the representation dated'28-5-2025 and to processandrefundtheamountofRs.l,63,999/-tothePetitloner.sbankaccount bearingNo.200g0T56696,StateBankoflndia,PeerzadigudaBranch,pending disPosal of this writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI Y'SHASHIDHAR REDDY CounselfortheRespondentsNo'1&2:ASST'GPFORREVENUE CounselfortheRespondentsNo.3:ASST.GPFoRSTAMPS&REGISTRATIoN The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION lvq.f€4O9 of 2o25 ORDER: This',r,rit petition is filed seeking following relief: "[.'or t]re reasol'rs statecl in the accompallving afficlavit, It is therefore pra-ved that this IIort'lllc.Court ma1'' be pleased to issue Writ or Orcler or Direction morc'particttlarl-l' o,e ir.r the nature o[ Writ of Mandamus cleclaring t]re inaction of the respondellts more parlir:urlerrll rcspotrcletrt tro.3 in not consiclering the representations/applicatiorrs datecl 2B-5-2O25 subrnitted by the petitioner to the responclent no'3, in reflunding the Barrk Clrallan clate<l 26-5-2022 bearing Challan No. [ATI?NI'836905286i025 tor an amount of Rs. 1,63,999/- srrbmitted torvards stamp dutl'for registratiotr of Gitt Deecl' inspite of rcct:i1tt <lt-the representation/applicatiorr clatecl 28-5-2025, resporlderrt no'3 dicl lrot act r,rporr tht, same is bacl, arbitrary, voicl, illegal arld against the principk:s of natttrerl jttstice arrcl violation ol Articles 14 arrd 300A of tlte Constituti<ln of Itr<.lia ;rrld Colrse(luenllr'<lrrcct the RespOnCletrts more particularif'rt:spoudent no'3 to process trtrcl refuncl tht: irrttottnt of lts. 1,63,9g9 l- to the Petitiont:r's bank accoutlt llearitrg No' 200g075(r(r<)(;, State lJank of India, Peerzacligrrcla Brarrch, u'ithin a stipulatccl perio<l arrrl lrass strch ot['rer order or orclers as this Hon'b]e Court mer-v cleetn [it ancl proper in the cir<'Ltrrtslances of the case'"

2. It is stated that the petitioner paid an amount of Rs'1,63,9991- rtrrough a Rank challan uid"e challan No.[ATRN]8369O52861025 dated 26.05.2022 in State Bank of India, Peerzadrguda B.ranch, for the purp<)se of registration of a Gift Deed in favour of the petitioner, but however' the property o[ the petitioner was kept in the list of prohibited properties list on the groupcl that civil suit is pending against the petitioner' The grievance of tfre petitioner is that she submitted a representation dated 28'05'2025 to the Jrrt respondellt requesting to refund the Bank challan amount of Rs.1,63,999/- $'hich rnas paid by :her uide challan No-[ATRN18369O52861025 datecl 2€t.Oc.2022 and. to credit the same to ttrc petitioner's Bank Account No.2OO9O 75669(t, but till date the said re presentation has t-tot bee n considercrd b1, tl-re ?r<l respondent. Hencc, the pre'sent writ petition. 2 CVb, W.P.No.18409 of 202-

3. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, lcarnccl Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. I and 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps ancl Rcgistratior-r appearing for respondenl No.3 and with thcir consent, this u,rit pctition is disposed of at the admission stage.

4. Lcartrcd counscl for the petitioner vehe'mently contended that once the do<:umcnts submitted by the petitioner are not processed for registration, lhc pctitioncr is entitled for the refund of the stamp duty and registration [r'cs.

5. [t is not in dispute that when the documents submitted by the petitioner at c no[ pt'occssed for registration undcr the provisions of the Registratiott Act,, 190c3, Lhcn the amount deposited towards the stamp duty or the registrzrtion cherrgc's arc liable to be returned. Admittedly, in the present writ pctition, rvhe n thc propertv which the petitioner sought to register by way of a Gitt Dci:d is listed in the prohibited properties list, the respondent authorities cvclt bcforc collcction of the stamp duty, ought to have informed to thc pctitior-rcr- that lhc said property is listcd under the prohibited propel'ties list. 'l'hcrt:[<rrc, thc Bank Challan itseltu,ould have been rejected at the thrcshold. I-laving accepted the Challan amount for entertaining the Gift Dced lor registration and proccssing the documents, it is an obligation on the parl- o[ thc rcspouclctrt autl-rorities to return the Challan amount collected from thc pctiLioncr. 3 CVBR,.I w'P'No'18409 of 2o25 6,Inr,icwoftheabovediscussion,thisCourtdeemsitappropriate todisposeoftlriswritpetitionpermittingthepetitionertomakeafresh application on the f*e of the 2,d respondent-District colrector, Medchar- Markajgiri Disrrict ancr the District Registrar, Medchar-Malkajgiri District seekingtorefuncltheBankChallanamountofRs.l,63,999/-,whichwas paid by rhe peririo.er uide charan No.[ATRN18369052861o2s 26.05.2022 and to credit the same to the petitioner's Bank Account No.2oo9o756696,rvithinaperiodo[two(02)weeksfromthedateofreceipt ofacopyofthisrlrder.lrrtheeventofsuchapplicationbeingmadebythe petitioner, 2,xr respo*dent-District collector, Medchal-Markajgiri District and theDistrictR.cgistrar,Medchal-MalkajgiriDistrictareclirectedtoobtain necessarv permissiiln from the Chief Commissioner of Land Acquisition' HyderabadtoenirblethemtorefundtheBankChallanamountof Rs.1,63,9991-tothecreditofthepetitiorrer,sBankAccount No.2OO9O 756696' The entire exercise shall be completecl within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of the application' T.Withtlreaboveobservations,thisWritPetitionisdisposedof. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscetlanc()uS applications pending, if any, sha ITRUE COPY/' sd/-U.SUDHA ISTANT RE GISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, i;iril;"i' HYderabad' I rThePrincipalsecretary'RevenueDepartment'Secretariat'stateof 2. The District collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana' 3E[?,g::]:ft [*11 4. One CC to SRI Y'SHASHIDHAR REDDY' Advocate' IOPUCI j;if, :f, :idi ",',':11,3[:?55s'"#eSub-Resistrar' 5' 6' to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of rerangana. b*,ir?"t Jr-f"Bffi;f bt?l STAMPS & REGrsrRArroN, Hish courr ror the State

7. Two CD Copies. BSK PMK (/+- HIGH COURT DATED:01 10712025 l r-l _l =i WP.No.18409 of 2025 t: !t i:.., !'- \.' ;. 0 3 tt-[ ?Ui l, (;l \.:::: DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0 rF f$\rr

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments