✦ High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025

B.Sailesh Saxena v. 1. The Union of lndia

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,129 words

7. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Hyderabad 8. The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Asifnagar, Hydeebad, - 9. The Station House Officer, Baniara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad 10. R.Srinivas, S/o R. Kistaiah, aged about 45 Yrs, Occ Real Estate Agent, Rl/o 7- 2-581 I 582, Burgushefty Bazaar, Secunderabad

11.R. Krishna Kumar, Sl0 R. Kistaiah, aged about 43 Yrs, Occ Real Estate Agent, Rl/o 7 -2-5811582, Burgusheety Bazaar, Secunderabad

12.P:Thirmal Reddy, S/o P.Venkat Reddy, aged about 48 Years, Occ Private Service Rl,/o Shamirpet, R-R. District l3.Venkata Raya Verma Vegesna, Managing Director Vertex Corporate. 4th Floor, Plot No.8 and 9, Jubilee Enclave, Opp. Hitex Entrance, Madhapur, Hyderabad

14. M. Shiva Shushan, S/o Raiaiah, aged about 63 Years, Occ Real Estate, agent Rl/o Attapur, Hyderabad -Khan,

15.Habeeb lslam S/o Late Qutubuddin lslam Khan, aged about 66 Years, Rl/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad l6.Naimuddin lslam Khan, S/o Late Nizamuddin lslam Khan Aged about 66 Years, Ri/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad

17. lftekhar lslam Khan, S/o Late Khaleeluddin lslam Khan Aged about 54 Years' Rl/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad

18.Ali Mohammed, 5/6 Mirza Qudharthullah, aged about 53 Years, Occ Land Grabbing No 22-4-43111 , Kotla Alijah, Hy<lerabad lg.NayeeriKhan, S/o not known, ag-ed abbut 55 Years, Occ Land Brabber R/o 8-i-399/50, Janaki Nagar, Tolichwki, Hyderabad

20.M.H. Farooqui, S/o noi known, aged ali,out 53 Years, Occ Land Grabbing Fl/o 8-1 -399/50, Janaki Nagar, Tolichowi, Hyderabad. .--r=i::,i:F

21.Naziar Ahmed Khan, S/o Not known, aged about 47 Years, Occ Advocate, No 10-2-1114, A.C. Guards, Saifabad, Hyderabad

22. Ayodhya Nagar Co.operative Housing Socieyt, reP, bY its Secretary, K. Malleshwar Rao, Ri/o H.no.3-3-76/1, Kings way Secunderabnad

23. Bangari Prakash S/o not known, Occ Corporator TRS Party, Guddimalkapur, Hyderabad

24. M'ohammed Basheer, S/o Mohd. Yousuf, aged about 44 Years, Occ Business, N o 7 -2-581 I 582, Burgushefty Bazar, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) to declare the illegal action of respondent No.6 under conspiracy with the unofficial respondents and proposed to file tender of pardon of the main culprits i.e., respondent No.10 to 12, 14,24 and others in FIR Nos 23512016, 2712017, 3512017, 4912017 etc., is highly arbitrary, unconstitutional, illegal, improper and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case ii) to declare the petitioner as a victim in hands of respondent Nos.10 to 12, 14,24, but not as an accused in the false FIRS registered against the petitioner in the FIR nos.235/2016, 2712017, 3512017, 4912017 etc and consequentially direct the respondent No.6 to drop the proceedings to file tender of pardon of the main culprits i.e, respondent No.10 to 12, 14,24 and to prosecute the main culprits, i.e. respondent Nos.10 to 12, 14, 24 and others, in FIR Nos.23512016, 2712017, 3512017, 4912017 etc l.A NO: 1OF 2017(wPMP. NO: 39538 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No 6 to drop the proceedings to file tender of pardon of the main culprits i.e, respondent Nos.10 to 12, 14,24 and to prosecute the main culprits i.e., respondent No.10 to 12, 14,24 and others, in FIR Nos.235/2016, 2712017, 3512017, 4912017 etc, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A SRINATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: OY. SOL GEN OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to9: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 10to24:- The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TIINARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.31752 OF 2OL7 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- \ \ "...to issue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) to declare the illegal action of respondent No.6 under conspiracy with the unofficial respondents and proposed to frle tender of pardon of the main culprits i.e., respondent Nos. 1O to 12, 14, 24 and others in FIR Nos.235 12016, 27 l2ol7, 35/2017, 49 l2ol7 etc., is highly arbitrary, unconstitutional, illegal, improper and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case ii) to declare the petitioner as a victim in hands of respondent Nos. 1O to 12, 14,24, but not as an accused in the false FIRS registered again5t tfi6 petitioner in the FIR nos.235/2016, 27 l2ol7, 3512OL7, 49/2017 etc and consequentially direct the respondent No.6 to drop the proceedings to file tender of pardon of tJle main culprits i.e, respondent No. l0 to 12, L4, 24 and to prosecute the main culprits, i.e. respondent Nos.lO to 12, L4, 24 and others, in FIR Nos.235/2O16, 27 l2ol7, 35l2ol7,49 l2Ol7 etc and pass such other order or orders may deem [-rt and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Srinath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of tllis Court to withdraw the writ Petition with a liberty to avail other remedies available under law.

3. Permission is accorded. 2

4. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. To, /ffRUE COPY// SD'. B. REKHA RANI TANT REGISTRAR \ ECTION OFFICER 1 One CC to SRl. A SRINATH REDDY' Ad-vocate [OPUC]- ' i i'iJ8 EdJL-e; FbC Hori,ie ,riighbourt ror the state or relansana at 3. 6'"".,=cti; di tdlr cr ron G ENERAL oF I ND I A[oPU cl 4. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad IOUTI BM \ck HIGH COURT DATED:0911012025 ORDER WP.No.31752 of 2Q17 I I HE S 1 TAIt o ) i\ fl 2fl2fi l{ t. fO al- ..:.). DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS * -fd Xr.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments