The High Court · 2025

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1 to 3 ...RESPONDENT No.1 2 B. Narender Reddy, S/o Late Pratap Reddy, Aged- 83 Yeards, Occ- Business, Annaram Village, Farooq Nagar [\Iandal, Ranga Reddy District. Present Address- H No. B-1-167i3. Mailardevpally, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict ...RESPONDENT No.2/DEFACTO COMPLAI NANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the Crime No. 82 of 2025 dated 1510312025 on the file of Nandigama Police Station, Cyberabad registered U/s 41 9, 420, 468 r/w 34 l.P.C., by compounding the offence in terms of compromise. -.rr-E+ I .ii l.A. NO: 2 OF 21t25 BETWEEN: 1 B. Narencer Reddy, S/o Late Pratap Reddy, Aged- 83 yeards, Occ- Business, Annaram Village Farooq Nagar lr,4andal, R-anga Reddy District. present Address- H No. B-1-167/3, M;itardevpally, Raje-ndra Najar N4andal, Ranga Reddy Dit;trict ...PETITIONERyRESPONDENT No.2/DE-FACTO COMpLATNANT AND 1 2 3 4 Smt. Gaoe Showreelu, Wo Arogya Reddy, Aged- about 55 years, Occ- Home Ma <er, R/o Fathimapur Villag'e, Kothui Maidal Ranga Reddy District Sri B- Pra ap Reddy, S/o Show Reddy, Aged 62 yea.s Occ- Agriculture. R/o Reddypalt:m Village. Kothur Ranga Ri-,ddf District. Sri Gade Arogya Reddy, S/o Rayapu Reddy, Aged- about 60 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o Fathimapur Village, Kothur Minda'i, Ranga Reddy Distribt ...RESPONDENTS/PET|T|ONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1 to 3 lftg St9!e of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecri:or, High Court for the State of Tr:langana. ...RESPONDENT No.1 Petition under Section 359 (6) BNSS, praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petitior. the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to Compound the case in Crime No. g2 of 2025 dated 151)312025 on the file of Nandigama police station, cyberabad registered U/s 4'r 9, 420, 468 r/w 34 LP C. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition u rder section 359(2) BNSS, praying that i, the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to rer;ord the above compromise and quash the crime ruo. az ot zozs daled 1510312025 on the file of Nandigama police Static r cyberabad against Accused Nos.1 tr:3/Respondent No.1 to 3 herein. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the rvremorandum of Grounds of crim nal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M A ALEEM MAJID, Advocatr: for the Petitioner and Sri. JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, Assistant Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri. K RAI\4ACHANDRl., Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION No.7725OF 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.82 of 2025 on the file of the Nandigama Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate.

2. The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 in the Crime Case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419' 420, 468 rlw 34 of lndian Penal Code.

3. Heard Mr.M.A.Aleem Majib, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and Mr.K.Ramachandra, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/de-facfo complainant.

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2lde-facfo complainant filed l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings againSC i6e petitioner/accused in Crime No.82 of 2025. 2 I-.4.N0t.2 and i of Cr/.P.No. 7725 oJ 2025 ,t:5

5. This ()ourt yrue order dated 25.06.2025 referred the parties to the High court l-egal Services committee for identification and to verify the voluntarinesr; in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Conmittee, has submitted report dated 04.O7.z}2|stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification c,f Aadhar cards/ldentity cards and the enquiries revealed that the pe rties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcc,mpromise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the rnaterials on record.

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable setflement between the parties, in the light of the dictums in Gran Singh v. Sfafe of punjab and anotherl and Anil Mi:;hra v. Sfate of ll.p.2; State of Madhya pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment or' the impugned proceedings in view of the setflement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 492 Cr.p.C.\S2B of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice. t 2012 (1O) SCC 303 I 2024 INSC 189 3 zots 1s; scc oarr 3 ^.r&/ lA.No and 3 0J 2025 in/and CrlP.No. 7725 of 2025

8. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, all the proceedings in Crime No.82 of 2025,on the file of the Nandigama Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3.

9. ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Shadnagar' 2. The Station House Officer, Nandigama P S 3. One CC to SRl. M A ALEEM MAJID' Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRl. K RAMACHANDRA' Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR' High Court for the State of Telangana Cyberabad' ' louTl

6. Two CD CoPies (Enclosed a Copy of Joint Memo Compromise) MKN/ABK Y" HIGH COLIRT DATED:1610712025 ,4' -\. 'J/a :\ 19 SEP 20fi 1j ')/. t js.s COMMON ,CRDER I.A.Nos. 2 /\ND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.7725 of 2025 DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION q ..d4 Yk 6tu HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I.A.NO. CRL.P, No. oF 202s oF 2025 Between:

1. Smt. Gade Showreelu ffo Arogya Reddy, Aged: about 55 Years, Occ: Home Maker, R/o Fathimapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Sri B. Pratap Reddy S/o Show Redcly, Aged: 62 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Reddypalem Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Sri Gade Arogya Reddy S/o Rayapu Reddy, Aged: about 60 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Fathimapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 And

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana.

2. B. Narender Reddy S/o Late Pratap Reddy, ...Respondent No. 1 Aged: 83 Yeards, Occ: Business, Annaram Village, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Present Address: H. No. B-1-t6l/3,lvlailardevpally, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..Respondent No. 2/ Defacto Complainant May it please your Lordships, .tolxu4ErvrQ

1. It is to submit that the allegation of the comptaint is that all the accused conspired and cheated the De-facto Complainant by execution of sale deed in favour of Accused No. 1. On the ocCasion of mutation of the land an extent of Ac. L-37 Gts. of Chegur Village, Nandigama Mandal of Ranga Reddy District the De-facto Complainant found that the accused committed cheating, forgery with common intention.

2. It is submitted that, I have filed private complaint before the Hon'ble Prinicip;l Judicial Magistrate of First class at Shadnagar against the petitionors herein (Accused Nos. 1 to 3). The Hon,ble court pleased and referred the case and then porice registered a FIF vide crime No. 82 of \ \ 2025 dated 15.03.2025 on the fire of Nandigama.porice station, cyberabad registererd uls 479, 420, 468 r/w 34 r.p.c., against the petitioners herein. 3. I submit that the intervention of the well-wishers and elders of the both parties settled the matter amicably out of the court. That due to the said reasons/ I came forward to withdraw the compraint for which I am arso executec an Affldavit stating that I am ready to withdraw the above said case.

4. It is subrnitted that the matter is setUed out of the court, I am ready to withdraw the case against the petitioners considering ail the above circumstrrnces this Hon'ble court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in , dakrd on the file of , otherwise the petitioners and their family members will suffer irreparable loss.' It is trerefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court ma1, be pleased to record the comgrromise statement and quash the crime No. 82 of 2025 dated

15.03.20i15 on the fire of Nandigama porice station, cyberabad registered U/s 479, .+20, 468 rlw 34 l.p.C., and pass such other order or orders may deem fit e nd proper in the interest oflustice. Hence, th s Joint Memo. Hyderabarl, Date: 19.()6.2025. 6 a,9@ lt y, gN#* Petitioner No.1 3 4. .o,,l$fio,4k "Y'oa- ( Co unse I for Responden I I l 6'br\D\.";J* Petitioner No. 3 z @^sB% Crez e\ e\ffiB / v 9z h.S.'rfJ#iu..,