Justice (Retrt.) t) v. Seethapathy

...Petitioner/Plaintiff AND 1 B. Chennamma, W/o Late B' Mallesha' Rlo. Pi-ot No'22' .Brindhavan ildftffi Vi]ili",-nE"naiJnlgii Minoat' Ransa Reddv District' Colony'

2. B. Parameshwar, S/o Late B' Mallesha' 3, B. Srinivas, S/o Late B' Mallesha' ' 4. B. Ramchander, (died per LRs' Respondent No'31) ' 5. B. Janardhan, S/o B- Ramchander' 6. B. Pandarinath, S/o B Ramchander' 7. B. Tulasi Das, (died per LRs' Respondent Nos'29 and 30) 8. B. Yadaiah, (died per LRs' Respondent No'32) 9. B. Ramesh, S/o B"Yadaiah' 10. B. Chennaiah, (died per LRs' Respondent No'33) 1't. B. Venkatesh, S/o B Chennaiah' 12. B. Laxmamma, W/o Late B' Dasaratha' -a: ""7 '13. B. Kash n:;fl-. Si/o Late B. Dasaratha, 14. B. Mahenrler. fi/o Late B. Dasaratha, 15. B. Nares;h S/,r Late B. Dasaratha, 16. B. Bal Raj S(r Late B. Ramaiah,

17. B. Venkatersh. .S/o B. Balraj, '18. B. Ramakr shrr;1, S/o B. Balraj 19. B- Jagarnada l, S/ o Late B. Ramaiah, 20. B. Harinath, [)'o B. Jagannadam, 21. B. Amarrra;i ti,o B. Jagannadam, 22.8. Panderr att S/o B. Jagannadam, 23. B. Sadar.andh lm, (died per LRs. Respondent No.35) 24.8. Dayanand, . j/o B. Sadanandham, 25. B. Chandrarnr: ran, S/o B. Sadanandham, 26. B. Srikanlh S/,> B. Sadanandham, 27. B. Gnanesl-w,a-. S/o Late B. Ramaiah, 28. B. Vamshik-ishna, S/o B. Gnaneshwar, 29. A. Ragavr:s hure rri, D/o Late Tulasidas, 30.M. Rajini, D,o Late Tulasidas, 31. B. Jayalallsfrnri W/o Late B. Ramchander, 32.8. Bharatanrma, W/o Late B. yadaiah, 33. B. Amrutharrnrir W/o Late B. Chennaiah, 34. B, Amrutha, y1//; Late B. Jagannadam, 35. B. Hemalath;a. \V/o Lafe B. Sadanandam Goud, All are R/o plot No.22, R:!8|til, :i' ': rv' Bandrasuda viir,;;,'R-;;;irilnrgol. v,,n.ra r,'ia-n!a

36.Justice (Retrt.) t) V. Seethapathy, (Respondent l,lo. 36 is a formal party) lA NO: 1 oF 2025 ...Responde,nts/ Respondents Petition under Se'ction 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fir':o irr s;unport of the petiiion, *ri- nign corrrt nray rre preased to stav the arbitrar awar,J ,t"t[a 6i.i.iofi':;';ffir';]der or ord.rs es the Hon,bre Court may deem ,,it { IA NO: 2 OF 2025 in the Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC praying that circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ;rtb; pleased to restrain the Respondents from alienating the Subject Property ielring land admeasuring Ac 1O-OO gts in Sy.'No l Part' Sy'no'2' Sy'No'3' sv.N.iz part and sy.t'toita of SikanJarguda Village' Rajendernagar..Mandal' n'rng; n"lav Districtiill the disposal ot l'A' t'to'.g: oI 2024 in c'o'P' No' 17 of 2n2i on the iile of the Hon'ble Additional Special Court of Commercial Disputes' Citv Ciuif Court at Hyderabad or till any othei time as the Hon'ble Court may deem it ana any other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit' CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO:2025 oF 2025 . Petition under Atlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order AateO te.oo.zO25 Passed in i.n. r'ro. 84 of 2025 in lA' No' 33 ot 2024 in C'O'P' No. 17 of 2024 on tne file of the court of the Additional Special court of Commercial Disputes, City Civil Court at Hyderabad' Between: M/s Pavani Estates, Rep by its Managing Partner,. R Narsimha Reddy'- S/o-R' iil;R;;y, Ait;a-huort o'g V"ir., Hzvi""g its registered office at Flat No.701' Ame-erpet, Hydera bad - 5000 1 6 i,Ir"niFititis"] -o-g-zes, " Petitio ner/P lai ntiff AND

1. B. Chennamma, W/o Late B' Mallesha' 2. B. Parameshwar, S/o Late B' Mallesha, 3. B. Srinivas, S/o Late B. Mallesha' 4. B. Ramchander, (died per LRs' Respondent No 31) 5. B. Janardhan, S/ o B. Ramchander 6. B. Pandarinath, S/o B. Ramchander, 7. B. Tulasi Das, (died per LRs' Respondent Nos'29 and 30) 8. B. Yadaiah, (died per LRs. Respondent No'32) 9. B. Ramesh, S/o B, Yadaiah, 10.B. Chennaiah, (died per LRs' Respondent No'33) 11. B. Venkatesh, S/o B. Chennaiah 12. B. Laxmamma, W/o Late B' Dasaratha'

13. B. Kashirrath, S/o Late B. Dasaratha,

14. B- MaherJerr, S/o Late B. Dasaratha, 15.8. Nare,sh, tik) Late B. Dasaratha, 16. B. Bal Fta j, ti'o Late B. Ramaiah, 17.8. Venl.al,-.st, S/o B. Balraj, 18.8. Ramakrisl-rra, S/o B. Balraj '19. B. Jagar. ac,?rrn. S/o Late B. Ramaiah, 20. B. Harrrallr. Siro B. Jagannadam, 2'1. B. Amarnerth, fi/o B. Jagannadam, 22.8. PandartaUr S/o B. Jagannadam, 23. B. Sadara rcllram, (died per LRs. Respondent No.35) 24- B. Daya'rarrc, fj/o B. Sadanandham,

25. B. Chan,jrarnrohan, S/o B. Sadanandham, 26. B. Srikantlr, {l'o B. Sadanandham 27. B. Gnan,:sh!r/ilr, S/o Late B. Ramaiah, 28. B. Vams rik rir;llra, S/o B. Gnaneshwar, 29.A. Ragal,esh'nari, D/o Late Tulasidas, 30. M. Rajini []/o _ate Tulasidas, 31. B. Jayalaks,hrni. Wo Late B. Ramchander, 32. B. Bharatantn.r: W/o Late B. yadaiah, 33.B. Amrutha.nrre, W/o Late B. Chennaiah, 34. B. Amrutha V/,o Late B. Jagannadam, 35. B. Hemal;att.a Brindhavan Cr Reddy Di:;trict ///o L^ate B. Sadanandam Goud, All are R/c, plo:No.22 r c,ny, Bandlaguda Village, Rajendranagar -l,n rnOI,if ,'[u'n'tju

36.Justice (Ret,l. ) :.V. Seethapathy, (Respondent Vo. 36 is a formal party) ...Respondrlnts/Respondents IAN O:1 OF 2025 Petitionundersection,l5lofCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ot if'. p.tiiion, tlie High Court may be pleased to stay the arbitral award dated 04.12.2023' lA NO:2 oF 2025 in the Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC praying that circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High court ;i";;.d to restrain tt'" Re"pond"nts from alienaling the Subiect Propertv ;;;;; u"iri"s '-land admeasuring Ac td-oogts in. Sy'No'1 Part' Sy'no'2' Sy'No'3' 6v.fl.."rz p".t and Sv.Nolta of Sikan-darguda Village' Raiendernagar.Mandal' nln; n"lov District till tne oisposat or l'A' No gg ol 2024 in c'o'P' No 17 of 2024 onthe file of tne nooitionaispeciat court of commercial Disputes, city civil Hyderabad or tif f any oifrer time- as the Ho.n'ble Court may deem fit and 6lrtt any other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem' "t . Counsel forthe Petitioner in both CRPs : Sri Avinash Desai' learned Senior Counsel representing Sri TPS Harsha Counsel for the ResPondent Nos' e, i, e, s, ir ro ll,il and 28. in both CRPs : Sri A venkatesh' learned Senior Counsel rePresenting Sri -V.Ramchander Goud' Counsel for the Respondent No'l8 in both CRPs : Sri Vikram Pooserla, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P.SandeeP Counsel for the Respondent Nos'20 to 22 in both CRPs : Sri Francis J.C Counsel for the ResPondent Nos' 24,25,26 and 35 in both CRPs Counsel for the ResPondent Nos' 29 & 30 in both CRPs : learned : Sri Surender Rao M, learned Senior Counsel rePresenting Sri G.V.Sahith Sri Dama Sheshadri Naidu' Senior Gounsel rePresenting Sri Dharmesh D'K. Jaiswal The Court made thefollowing: COMMON ORDER ,7 I I I I I { l l TIIT) TION'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHIMI BIIATTACHA RYA AND rIIE, HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDII.A N R]I\O CIv'IL EVISION PETITION Nos.2O2O AND 202!i oF 2025 i\lr. Avrra.l: ltr,sai, learned Scnior Counscl representing l{r_TI,s Ila.sha. learned counsel a1 :r, rt, i rg for the petitioner. Mr. Danra iih: rlradri Naidu, Iearned Senior Counsel represenling 1,1r. D rarmesh D.K. ,Iaisu,al, le rlt c I counscl for thc respondent Nos.29 and 30 fO.rli;(, I ro M. learned Senior Counsel representing Ma lsp,,rd(nr Nos.24. 25, 2b and 35. counsel ir iiL \,lr. A. /. lr: r I jh, lcarncd Senior Counsel representing Mr.\..ii irrr.h rnclcr Goud, iearnccl r or r t. br the respondent Nos.3, 5, 6, 9, l l to 17. 27 at\d )t Mr. Vikra r r (iou nsel lcr -rrserla, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr.pSi1(cep. Iearned I'r' , rsl-rc,odent No. i8_ ( !.Sa hith. lcarned Mr. Fran ti: i - . lcamcd counsel appearing for the responden Nos 20 lo 2l COMMO.N CIRDER: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushurnt B rartt charl,a) 'l'h r P rr ard debtor has filed two Civil Flevirion pctitions rcrusrng to C)o rmercial liom crilcrr':, datcd 1g.06.2025 and 19.06.2O2t extend r. rL: inl,er-im order passed by the learned Court i I it\,,) _lr- of the Award debtor on 13.06.2025 2. Thr, 1z r,ts which are relevant for the preserrr o, ders are Lhat Lh,: 'rrf rrgned Award dated 04.12.2023 was f .rss,)d in the Arvard l)r btr r's application for stay of the Award uncle . Section 36 (2) o "l hr:7q5[i11a1ion an,l Conciliation Act, 1()96. 3. On I l_r.16,2025, the Award_clebtor .was gra':rtec limited protecti()r l rll 16.06.2025 on alienation oi tl e r;chedule l l. property. This interim order was subseqr'rently extended till 18.06.2025. Thereafter. on 18'06'2025 and 19 06'2025' the Commerciai Court declined to extend the interim protection on the ground that the Court was already considering the application for stay on which order was reserved' The matter was made returnable on 02 'O7 '2025 ' 4. We have heard extensive submissions o[ learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties on the maintainability and meritsoftheC.R.P.,s.Aftercoveringtheentrrepartofthe morning session, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.29 and 3O, on instmctions' oflers to give an undertaking that the respondents will not alienate the schedule property till O2.O7 .2025 as was initially directed by the trial Court on 13.06.2025' l,earned Senior Counsel appearing for the other

5. respondents have also agreed to give this undertaking' 6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and the facts pertaining to the present C R'P's' we deem it ht to resolve the differences between the parties on a temporary basis as undertaken on behalf of the respondents' 7 . We therefore record that the respondents are willing to give an undertai<ing that they shall not alienate the schedule \ I 1 i l i I I I I t I I I 1 i l I i I l I . -.i,:l€'E_ --9' :]t ./ -z se:elt propel tr '1 t,ich forms a subject matter of I.A.No.iJ3 < f 2024 in C.O.P.N, .l'' ol 2024 on the hle of Additional Sp:cia. Court of Comm:r :r .r Disputes till Og .OZ .2025 or unti from tlrl rl,:,,. e1,1 u.hich the certified copy of the orCer rassed in I.A.No.l: ,tl ,)024, is made available to the parlies. u,h chever is later. 'l'l _. o:rties shall treat this as an order of Cc urt based on the unclt t;, l:;ng given by the respondents. Nr:r ilr ss .to say, this order shall be bin,lir.rg on the 8. responc('r l:l 'lilrties who are not represented belorc. tlre Cour[ (O7) days today.

9. We .r. ,r ke it clear that we have not expressed an1, opinion on the nle,iis ,rf the dispute between the parties. 10. C. R r \ rrs.2020 and 2O2S of 2025, rrlong r .ith all connectr rl :r r: li<:ations, are disposed of in terrrLs o ti11 zb6ys_ There sl'ral l:r 116 6pdg1 as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. SM]" B. REKHA RANI ASSt$TANt'REGTSTRAR SI=CTION OFFICER The Additional S;pecial Court of Commercial Disputes, Ci\ Civ I Court at Hyderabac One CC to S,i l-r)S Harsha, Advocate IOPUCI One CC to S, v. famchander Coro, Aavo"IL [opUC] * tv' vv] One CC to S, F) S;andeep, Advocate [OrUq 9n" 99 to Sr F rancis L.b, Advocate iOpUCi 9n" 99 to Sr (] \/.Sahith, Advocate tijpUCj 9n" 99 to Srr t)harmesh O.K. Jaiswlt, nAJl"at" tOpUCl Two CD Copi,::s To, 1

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. M8. ADK HIGH COLIFIT DATED:24.1(t,6t20?s COMMON If]TDER CRP.No.2O2C and 2O2S ot 2025 t t -.-A -/.,1. i\ ' ti. ,t/- ' F. ) O ) d i*\\'\. ! t - :" . t-: : r-:: -i '' DISPOSINGi (:)F THE BOTH CRPS WITHOUT C]OSTS @.^r XA ) b 1, i I I I ! i I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I { , I I