The High Court · 2025

'1. The State of Telangana, Rep. By its public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. Through SHO, Vanastalipuram.

2. Galji Ashwini, D/o Gajji Narsaiah, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Household, R/o IVledical and Health Colony, Vanastalipuram, Ranga Reddy District. ...RespondenUDefacto complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FlR.No.553 of 2025 on the file of the Vanastalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda registered for the offences u/s 1 15 (2), 325, 351 (2) RA/V 3 (5) BNS 3 (1) (0 (s), 3 (2) (va) SC Sr PoA Act. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/ Accused No.1 to 5 in FIR.No.553 of 2025 on the file of the Vanastalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda, pending disposal of the main Crl.P. I I I , '=j*rc<rr{€SAlriGEt!.Eri r5r &'sic*iar- l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Gajji Ashwini, D/o Gajji Narsaiah, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Household, Rio Medical and Health Colony, Vanastalipuram, Ranga Reddy District. ...Petitioner/2nd Respondent in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND

1. Tanneru Venkateshwarlu, S/o Venkat Subbaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ Household.

2. Thanneru Mallikarjun, S/o Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Pvt Employee.

3. Thanneru Chittamma, Wo Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Housewife, Thaneeru Anusha, Wo Mallikarjun, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Housewife, (All are R/o H.No.4-3-187122, Plot No. 22, Seetaramapuram Colony, Near Word 86 Deed School, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District) ...Respondents/Petitioners in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. By its public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. Through SHO, Vanastalipuram- ... RespondenURespondent No.1 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/R-2 to compound the offences against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 4 and quash FlR. No .55312025 on the file of the Vanasthapuram Police Station, Rachakonda registered for the offences u/s 1 15 (2), 325, 351 (2) RA/tl 3 (5) BNS 3 (1) (0 (s), 3 (2) (va) SC Sr PoA Act I.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the F|R.No.55312025 on the file of the Vanasthapuram Police Station, Rachakonda registered for the offences u/s 115 (2),325,351 (2) RA/v 3 (5) BNS 3 (1) (r) (s), 3 (2) (va) SC ST PoA Act asainst the Petitioners/ Accused No.1 to 4 in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Madanu Naresh, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri P.Bosu Babu, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 OF 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION No.7697 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners in FIR No.553 of 2025 on the file of the Vansthalipuam Police Station, Rachakonda.

2. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4 in FlR.No.553 of 2019 registered foi' the offences punishable under Sections 1 15(2), 352, 351(2), r/w.3(5) BNS, 3(1) (r) (s), 3(2Xva) SC ST PoA Act.

3. Heard Mr.[Vl.Naresh, learned counsel for the petitioners, lVr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, iearned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and Mr.P.Bosu babu, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/de-faclo complainant.

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2/de-facfo complainant filed I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 in FlR.No.553 of 201 9. 2 r71i./ l..'l-l..io.r.) ard I of 2025 h/ and (.-rl. P. li o. 7 6 9 7 oJ 2 02 5 5' This court vide otd.* dated 24.06.2025 referred the parties to the High court Legar Services committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services committee, has submitted report dated oB.o7.2o2s stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar cardsirdentity cards and the enquiries reveared that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record.

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicabre settrement between the parties and to restore peace between the parties, in the right of the dictums in Gian singh v' sfate of punjab and anotherl and Anir Mishra v. state of lJ.P.2; State of Madhya pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and ofhersr, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the setflement by exercising jurisdiction under '.2012 (10) scc 303 . 2024 INSC 189 I zots 1s1 scc oea 3 N71r/ I. .!.No.r.) attd I of 2025 itt/a Cr/.1,.N0.7697 of 202i Section 482 Cr.p.C.lS2B bf BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice Accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed all the proceedings in FIR No.553 of 2025 on the file of the Vansthalipuam police Station, Rachakonda, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4. . Consequenfly, q ln the above terms, the Criminal petition is disposed of Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/- A. PRATHIMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR secffiorrrcen To,

1. The Vll Additional Mekopolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Hyathnagar, Rangareddy. Hyderabad [OUT]

2. The Station House Officer, Vanasthalipuram, Po ce Station, Rachakonda. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to Sri Madanu Naresh, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri P.Bosu Babu, Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CD Copies NVB/gh (r ) l l HIGH COURT DATED:1510712025 \ t COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 OF 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.7697 of 2025 - 1HE Sl4r6 /. ( o )[: I' 1f [lJB [6 ( z ,)]. * t) a- sp/,i cH f DISPOSING THE CRLP AND ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.3&4OF2025 ( E 1s a z) MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (Filed under Sec.359 of BNSS) IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE OF'TELANGANA AT:: IfYDERABAD 7{1E-" F 2025 Crl.P.No. Between: Gajji Ashwini, D lo Gajji Narsaiah, aged about 20 years, Occ: Household, R/o Medical & Health Colony, Valastalipuram, Ranga Reddy District. Petitioner/ 2"d respondent AND .1. Tanneru Venkateshwarlu, S/o Venkat Subbaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ:' Household,

2. Thanneru Mallikarjun, S/o Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee,

3. Thanneru Chittamma, W/o Venkateshwarlu, Aged dbout 55 years, Occ: Housewife,

4. Thaneeru Anusha, W/o Mallikarjun, Aged about 32 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No. 4-3-187 /22,PlotNo.22, Seetaramapuram Colony, Nea:: Word & Deed School, Haiathnagar, Ralga Reddy District. ..Respondents /Petitioners

5. The State of Telangana Rep. By its public prosecutor, High Court,'Hyderabad . Through SHO, Vanastalipuram. .....Respondent/ Respondent No. 1 ',t:, '- i 1 t )i 1 I I 1 i l : l : ,l I I l .t }' t i I I I t i I I + i I I I 1 : ', j t j 1 j i i Tt I t I I I f I f i i i { I : 1i I ; i. i I .l i I I t,, I '. g JOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitioner/defacato complainant have amicably settled the dispute at r'the intervention of elders, friends ald well wishers and the matter has been compromised between them. Hence the both parties came to compromise and the parties of have no claims or rights against each other in the future. 6 A4'"r; Defacto Complainant I I I i I .fEl< Accused No.1 .f .mil)ikoorwt. Accused No.2 Accused No3 c SCd No.4 M, Co'iris I e Accused r&C ounSel r 4he-eotrrplainalt a I