The High Court · 2025

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Deverakonda, Nalgonda District. 2. The Tahsildar, Chinthapally Mandal, Chinthapally, Nalgonda District 3. The District Collector, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda. 4. Fahkurla @ Palakura Sateemma (died), 5. Palakurla @ Palakura Yadamma, Wo. Madagoni Jangaiah, Aged major. 6. Palakurla @ Palakura Mallesh, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 7. Palakurla @ Palakura Baskar, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 8. Palakurla @ Palakura Parmesh, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 9. Palakurla Palakura Venkataiah, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. l0.Palakurla Palakura Srinivas, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major.

11. Palakurla @ Palakura Anjaneyulu, Sio. Late Narsimha, Aged major. (All are R/o. Godakondla village, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District)

12.The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the order of the 1st respondent in Case No.Bl197t2O2O, dated 16.06.2025 and set aside the same and direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject land admeasuring Ac 10-22 guntas in Sy.No.136 of Godakondla Village, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation and effect of the order of the 1sr respondent in Case No. 81197212020, dated 16.06.2025, pending disposal of the writ petition and grant such other relief as it deems fit in.the circumstances of the case. tA NO: 2 OF 2025 BETWEEN

1. Palakurla @ Palakura Sateemma (died), 2. Palakurla @ Palakura Yadamma, Wo. Madagoni Jangaiah, Aged major. 3. Falakurla @ Palakura Mallesh, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 4. Palakurla @ Palakura Baskar, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 5. Palakurla @ Palakura Parmesh, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 6. Palakurla Palakura Venkataiah, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 7. Palakurla Palakura Srinivas, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. 8. Palakurla @ Palakura Anjaneyulu, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged major. (All are R/o. Godakondla village, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District) .........Petitioners/Respondents 4 To 1 1 AND

1. Boddupaly Padmaiah, S/o. Late Ramchandraiah, aged about 75 years. 2. Boddupally Janardhanachary, S/o. 52 years. 3. Boddupally Prabakara Chary, S/o. Padmaiah, aged about 52 years. All are Fl/o. Godakondla village (Mall),Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District).

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District. 5. The Tahsildar, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda 6. The District Collector, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda. 7. The State Of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. B. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District. ....RespondenUPetitioner 1 To 3,12,13 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim stay Dt. 24- 06-2025 in lA no. 1 of 2025 in WP no. 17570 of 2025. counseI for the Petitioners,t*'XEiHHili:n$8fl+tNA REP M/s Counsel for the Respondents No 1To 3,12: SRI L. RAVTNDER AGP FOR REVENUE REP GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No 4To 11: SRl. V. RAVINDER RAO REP SRI M. VENKATESWAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER t. a )r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.\TENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No. L757O of 20125 Dated: 23.12.2o25 Between: Boddupally Padmaiah and two others .. Petitioners And Revenue Divisional Officer, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District and eleven others ... Respondents ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of tndia seeking the following relief/s:- o... to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the order of the lst respondent in Case No. B/1972/2020, dated L6.O6.2025 and set aside the same and direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject land admeasuring Ac.lO-22 guntas in Sy.No.136 of Godakondla village, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District and grant such other relief ...."

2. Heard Mr.Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned senior counsel representing M/s.Bharadwaj Associates, appearing for petitioners, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3, 12 and Mr.V.Ravinder Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.M.Venkateswar Rao, learned counsel for unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 11. Perused the record. b ii. i I l j I I I I I r 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners strbmits that the impugned proceedings vide case No.B/ L972 l2O2O dated L6.O6.2O25 passed by respondent No.1 are not in accordance with la#. Ho,uvever, without going into the aspects of the merits or demerits of the case since, the Appeal provision is available under law as against the impugned proceedings, he seeks tiberty of this Court to file an Appeal before the appropriate forum.

4. Learned senior counsel appearing for unofficial respondent Nos.4 to t2 takes ho objection'to the same.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue also concedes to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners.

6. Recording the submissions of all the learned counsel, this Writ Petition stands dismissed by granting liberty to the petitioners to file an Appeal before the appropriate forum, within a period of lifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. on filing such Appeal, the appellate authority is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of (90) a I 5- I ./ J working days from the date of filing of the Appeal, by putting the interested parties on notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. Needless to mention, the period of limitation from the date of filing this writ Petition to the date of receipt of a copy of this order, stands condoned.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. Till filing of the Appeal, both the parties to this writ petition are directed to maintain status qua as on date in all respects. No As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA . TANT REGISTRAR ON OFFICER l To,

1. One CC to M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES, Advocate [oPUC] 2. One CC to SRI M.VENKATESWARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.tOUTl 4. Two CD Copies DAN BS R- F HIGH COURT DATED:2311212025 ORDER WP.No.17570 of 2025 I \{E SIA ( C) C) O B JIN ?U?! { O;-. .:l ., DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I \L iit6a