✦ High Court of India · 23 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,506 words

Pdtition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the permission Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and respondent no.2 to compound the offences in C C'No 9657 of 2022 lx Additional Metropolitan Magistrate court, cyberabad at Kukatpally for the offences under Section 2O4,419 IPC and section 66-c of lT Act against the petitioners/Accused No. 1&2 be quashed. t.A. No.2 of 2025 petition under section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the cifcumstances stated in the Affidavit and Joint Memo of compromise filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to compromise and consequently quash the proceedings as against the petitio ners/accused no.1 and 2 in c.c.No.9657 of 2022 on the file of lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court' Cyberabad at Kukatpally' CRL.P.No.6835 of 2023: Between 1 t\/lr. Siva Seshagiri Rao Chagarlamudi, S/o Rangq Rao, r\' ed about 55lears, Occ. Govt. Em"ptoyee, R/o- H.No.59-A-21/1-2, R.R Girt iens, Higl^ School Road, Patamata Vrlayawada, Krishna District. 2 lMr. Rahul Chagar[amudi S/o Siva Seshagiri Rao, Ag:d 24 years, R/o. H.No.59-A-21/1-7. R R Gardens High School Road. Pat nata, Vijayawada, Krishna District AND ...pETrroNEFr \ccusED No.1&2 1 The State of Telangana Represented by Public ProsecLtt: . High Court of 2. D. Chindra Se(har, Addl Development Commissioner, Nll ME-DFO, Telangana at Hyderabad Narsapur Cross Roads, Balanagar It/ain Road, KukatpatI ldustrial Estate. Balanagar, Hvderabad, Telangana - aoooLliuaroNDEN. /coMpLATNANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr P.C praying that r he circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition :l e High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedlngs in C.C.No. 9657 of 2(",2 on the flle of lX Additional Metropolrtan Nlagistrate Court, Cyberabad at Kukat I I y. l.A. NO: 2OF 2023 Petrtion under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that rr .he circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,thtr llgh Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including i ppearance of the petitione rs/Accused No 1 and 2 in C.C No. 9657 of 202') on the file of lX Additional Metropolitan IMagistrate Court, Cyberabad at Kukat I Llly. These Petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing :l e Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petltion and Compromise Petition an,j upon hearing the arguments of G.Jayaprakash Babu, Advocate for the Petitlor(-in l.A Nos.1&2 of 2025 and Respondent No 2 in Crl.P and of Smt R-Annapurrli , Advocate for the Respondent No.1 in I A. Nos.1 &2 of 2025 and Petitioners in o . P. and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 in l.A,No; 1&2 of 2025 and Respondent No.1 in Crl P. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.1 and.2 of 2o25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.6835 of 2o23 Date:23.12.2o25 Between : Siva Seshagiri Rao Chagarlamudi and another Petitioners / Accused Nos. 1 and 2 AND Tl-re State of Telangarra Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTclangana at Hyderabad and another Respondents :: COMMON ORDER:: ' This Criminal Pctition has been hled by the petitioners / accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.965T of 2022 on the file of the IX Additional Meiropolitan Magistrate Court, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, for the offence under Sections 2O4 and 419 of the IPC and Section 66-C of I.T. Act.

2. Heard Mrs.R. Annapurna, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.G. Jayaprakash Babu, learned counsel for respondent No.2, and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1-State. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submit -' d that during the 3. pendency of the present Crimir-ral Petition, at th<' i rstance of the well wishers, rciatives and elders, pctitioner No 1 a r.( responclcnt No.2 have settled the disputes pending between tht:r: compromise and hled Joint Memo Accordingly, 1 etitioner No' 1 and respondent No.2 have filed l.A.Nos l and 2 of 2025 ;eeking permission to compound thc offences and Lo record the comprl nise respectively' and entered into

4.ThisCourtuideorder,datedll'l22O2S,clirctedthepartiesto appear bcfore the High Court Legal Services Corr nittee' Hyderabad' onorbefore16.|2.2025fortheiridcntification.Icomplianceofthe said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Serv r:s Committee' has submittedreport,dated16.12.2025,statingthatretitionerNo'1and respondent No,2 were duly identificd with copi' s of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that petitioner No' 1 i r ci respondent No'2 have willfully and without any coercion entered irr ' compromise' In view of the said report and also in vierr of the compromise 5. entered between petitioner No.1 and respondcnt Io'2 as well as the submissions made by the respectivc parties, I A \ ls' I and 2 of 2025 areallowed.Consequently,theproceedingsint]C.No.9657of2022 onthefileofthelXAdditionalMetropolitarrMagistrateCourt, CyberabadatKukatpally,areherebyquashedagairstpetitionerNo.l' 3

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in respect of petitioner No. 1, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.5,OOO/ - (Rupees ltve thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad, by petitioner No.1, on or before 31.12.2025. SD/- A SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /< ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Commissionerate

1. The lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Cyberabad at Kukatpally 2 The Station House Officer, Cyber Crime Police Station, Cyberabad 3 One CC to Sri G.Jayaprakash Babu, Advocate (OPUC) 4. One CC to Smt R.Annapurna , Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at . Hyderabad.(OUT)

6. Two CD Copies Ks/PSL Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Smt R.Annapurna Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 23 12 2025 as Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 152368 ot 2025 dated 30.12.2025 HIGH COURT DATED:2311212025 ORDER f.A.Nos.1&2 ot 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.6835 of 2023 Allowing the Crl.P in terms Of compromise. t n (, ( * i: Si4 0 lAl 2o2s F * :r,Tf.H lF._ MEMORANDUM OF CRIIUINAL MSIC PETITION (uNDtrR StrC.320(2) R/W.528 OF BNSS) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT :: HYDERABAD I i 1 CRL.P. No OT'JJ oF 2023 Between: NIr. Siva Seshagiri Rao Chagarlamudi, S/o. Ranga Rao, aged about 55 years, Occ: Govt Employee, R/o. H.No.59-A-2llI-2, R.R. Gardens, High School Road, Patamata, Vij ayawada, Krishna District. Petitioners/ Accused No. 1 And 1 2 J The State of Telangala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. D. Chandra Sekhar, Add1. Development Commissioner, MSMtr-DFO, Narsapur Cross Roads, Balanagar Main Road, Kukatp ally Industrial Estate, Balanagar, Hyderabad, Telargana - 500037. ... Respondents/Complainant Mr. Rahul Chagarlamudi., S/o. Siva Seshagiri Rao, aged 24 years, R/o. H.No.59 - A-2r I t-2, R.R. Gardens, High School Road, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 'r (Respondent No. 3 Not Necessary Party In this Petition) ...Respondent/Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2 ! JOINT MEMO,FILED THE PETITIONEBS./AEOU]ST ..)NO.1 &2AND DEFACTO COMPLAIN T RESPONDEN I X9.2 1 We sutrmit that the Respondent No.2 had lodg t c a complaint rn Cr.No.433 of 2022 on the file of P.S. Cyber Crime, , rberabad, Ranga Reddy. The police after completion of investigation, , harge sheet was filed before the IX Addl. Metropolitan Magistrzrr t , Cyberabad at Kukatpally vide C.C No. 9657 of 2022 for the offenc :s under section 2O4, 419 IPC and Section 66-C of IT Act; 2008.

2. We submit that rvhile the matter stood thus , ihe matter was settled by the intervention of elders, we both compr() nised the matter ald lr,e :Lre living in peace and harmony. Therefore, it is prayed before this Hon'ble Cou- may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceerl ngs against the petitioners / Accused No. 1 and 2 in C.C No. 9657 of ?- )22 on tire file of IX Additional Metropolital Magistraie Court, Cyberar ad at I(ukatpally in the interest of justice. Hence Joint Memo. 2"d Re spondent/ Defac o Complaina-nt l"t Petitior r, r/Accused No. 1 Counsel for 2"d po ent COllnrj I for Petitioners HYDERABAD Date: l(111.2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments