'l . The Branch [\4anager v. 1. The Second Appellate Authority

3. K.G. Parameswaran, S/o Late Sri K.P.Gopala Krishnan, R/o 4-2-890, Ramkote, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to S.A.No.12 of 2002 from the 1st respondent herein and consequently quash the order dt- 19-2-2004 recieved by the Appellant on 4-3-2004 is illegal and arbitrary nature. |.A.NO:1 OF 2004 (WPMP. NO: 10741 OF 2004) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay the opreratron of the order dated 19-02-200 4 passed by the first respondent in S.A.N,: 12 of 2002. l.A.NO:1 OF 2005 tWPMP.NO:5740 OF 200 s) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rr supporl of the petition, the High Court rray tre pleased to set aside the orders lt 21-2-2005 by affording an opportur)i1y of hearing to the workme n. |.A.NO:1 OF 2011 (WPMP.NO:17740 OF 2011 Petition Undr:r Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rr;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court 'nry be pleased to set aside the order of cisnrissed for default passed on 17-2-20' 1 anrl restore the WP No.8267 of 2004 back to file and hear the case on merits. Counsel for the Petitioners : M/s G.SUDHA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Re:;pondent No.3 : SRI V.HARI HARAN W.P.NO:18209 OF 2006 Between: Iril/s. fVeco Tronics, 5-9-241lN AandB, Abids road, Regional \4anager, Syed Yasen. Hyderabad-500 001, rep. byits ,...PETITIONER AND '1 . Mr. K.G. Pararneswaran, S/o. Late K.P. Gopala Krishnarr, Rt/o. 4-2-986, Ramkote, Hyderabad.

2. The Authority under the A.P. Shops and, Establishments /,ct, 1gBB, Asst. Commissioner of Labour Circle-lll, T. Anjaiah Bhavan, Rfr) Q1e55 por6., Hyderabad.

3. Branch Manager, M/s. Meco Tronics Ltd., 5-9-241-A and E/1 , Abid road, Hyderabad.

4. l\//s. Meco Trorucs Ltd., rep. by its Vice-President, 48, [\/ount Road, Chennai- 600 034. -','"'4^1-_f{:i

5. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Abids, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l\,4andamus declaring the action of the first and second respondents issuing consequential proceedings in Crl.M.P.2092 of 2006 emerging out of in SE No.1 of 1999 are illegal, unenforceable, arbitrary against rule of law against the Petitioner establishment and consequently declare the Petitioner establishment i.e., tt4/s. Mecotronics establishment is an independent Juristic personality and liabilities of fifth respondent Meco Tronics Ltd., Company Chennai i.e., consequential proceedings Crl.M.P.No.2092 of 2OOG in S.E.No.1 of 1999 on the file of XXI Metropolitan ltilagistrate cum Special Court for cases under Labour and Factories Act, City Criminal Courts, Nampally, Hyderabad of cannot be enforced through the Fifth respondent herein agaisnt the Petitioner establishment. |.A.NO:1 OF 2006 (WVMP. NO: 2585 OF 2006 Between Mr. K.G. Parameswaran, S/o. Late K.P. Gopala Krishnan, R/o.4-2-986, Ramkote, Hyderabad. ....PETITIONERYRESPONDENT .1 AND 1 The Authority under the A.P. Shops and, Establishments Act, 1988, Asst. Commissioner of Labour Circle-lll, T. Anjaiah Bhavan, RTC Cross Roads, Hyderabad. 2 J 4 Branch.Manager, M/s. Meco Tronics Ltd., 5-9-241-A and B/1 , Abid road, Hyderabad. l(: 149"o Tronics Ltd., rep. by its Vice-president, 48, Mount Road, Chennai_ 600 034 Assistant Commissioner of police, Abids, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

5. Mis. lvleco l-ronics, 5-9-241lAlAandB, Abids road, Hr,oerabad-SO0 001, rep by its Regioral N4anager, Syed Yasen. ...RESP,l NDENT/PETITIONER Petrtion Und:r Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the c rrrumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor rt may be pleased to vacate the interim rrrder dt 1-9-2006 passed in WPMP No. 22873 of 2006 in WP No. 18209/2006. I.A.NO:3 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22873 OF 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Coud, n ay be pleased stay operation of the ordr:r passed in Crl.lV.P.No.2092 of 2006 by the XXI Metropolitan l\,4agistrate cum Sp:cial Courl for cases under Labour 8 Factories Act, City Criminal Courts, Nampally, HyCerabad which is under enfc. rcement through the Fifth respondent her,:in. Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s G.SUDHA Counsel for the Resoondent No.1 : SRI V.HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : SRI S.ASHOK ANAI{D KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.S : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following COMMON ORDER -1. ...l.i{!;*::E\), '/. ,IHE, HON'BLI], SI{I JUST'ICD NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.8267 o12004 and 18209 of 2006 CON{]VION ORDIiIT: Lcarncd counsel for thc petitioncrs infonned this Court that the company docs not exist.

2. In vicw of the above sutrmission, these writ petitions ale closed [.lor.'".ever, Iiberty is given to tl're respondents to workout remedics, i1' anything survives in thcse writ petitions. No order as to costs As a sequel, misccllancous applications pending, if any, in these Writ Petitions, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/. M. NAGAMANI STANT REGIS ECTION OFFICER To 1 ) 4 5 6 SA PVL Two CCs to GP FOR LABOUR, High Court for the S Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR HOlr,4E, High Court for the Stat Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to lr//s G.SUDHA, Advocate IOPUC] One CC to SRI V.HARI HARAN, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI S ASHOK ANAND KUIVIAR, Advocate IOPUC] Ie f Telangana at eo elangana at . Two CD Copies ,, HIGH COURT DATED:1910812025 ( o. (-) ts NI M : l. .,/ COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.8267 of 2004 AND 18209 of2006 CLOSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS. /o /rc E//,.'x )