✦ High Court of India · 08 Jan 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Jan 2025
Length
1,009 words

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos: 4792 AND 5269 OF 2008 AND CONTEMPT CASE No.2092 OF 2013 CRP.No.4792 of 2008 Petition under Section '1 15 of Civil Procedure Code against the Order dated 19.02.2008 Passed in EP.No.134 of 2007 in OS.No.11 of 2000 on the fite of the Court of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts Hyderabad. Between: Andhra Pradesh State Trading Corporation Ltd., Now Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion Corporation Ltd. Rep. by its M.D., having office at Shakar Bhavan, Fateh Maidan, Baheerbagh. ... Petitioner/Respon denUJ. Dr. AND G. Sambandam & Company,, Rep. by its Partner, T.S.Rajeshwaran, S/o. ShanmugamModaliar Business, R/o. Visakhapatnam having office at 10-1-33, Visakhapatnam. ... RespondenUPetiti oner/D. H l.A. NQ 2 OEaQOSLCRPII4P- xQl !357!E 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in EP No. 134107 in OS No. 11l00, dt. 19-02-08, on the file of lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above CRP. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2008(CRPMP. NO:7870 OF 2008) Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidirvit filed in support of the petition, ine Hign Court may be pGiseO to vacate the interim stay granted in cRp.Mp. No. 6357 of 200g in cRp.No. 4792 of 2008 dt. 06/1 112008 counse! for the Petitioner: sRt B.SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI D. UDAI BHASKAR CRP.No.52(i9 of 2008 Between: Petition under Section 1 15 of Civil Procedure Code against the Order dated 2910912008 Passed in EA.No.307 of 2OO7 in OS.No.134 0{2007 on the fite of the court of the lV Senior civil Judge, city civil courts Hyderabad. S.G. Sambandan & Co* Repted. by.its p?(ner, Sri T.S. Rajeswa S.hanrnugamMudatiar, Busiriess, Rlo. ft.ruo.i'O_J_Si,- Wattri,. Visakrapatnam. ran, S/o Uplands AND ...Petitioner/Petitioner Decree Holder

1. Andhra Pradesh state Trading corporation Ltd., rep. bv, its Manaoino Di rect or. h avi no thei r ofrice ais ha (ka r sh ava n,' rJIh JilEffi;IiilinJe roag n, Hyderabad. - ' E :B:il x.? g:x:'J#" :[t B :i: y3t8gli,?a i i,.;ii3Lu:3l ^tH?,pv ...Respondents/Respondent. J. Drs. t.A. 1 0t: RPMP. 7025 0F 2008) Petitirln under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,-the High court rry o. fLaseo to direct the re:;pondent-No.2 to deposilthe rents paya6te to the tst nesponoent to the credit of EP No 134 0t 2007 in oP N0.11 0t'zcioo on the file of the lV senior Civil Judge, {)ity Civil Court, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 1 Ot:2009(CRpMp. NO:3962 OF 2009) Petitior under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in. support of the peiitioh, ine High court 1.."t il;reaseo to vacate the interim !1ryctjons granted by this Hon'bte-Court in CRp.Mp.No.70 25 of 2008 in cRp No.5269 0f 2008 0n 07 toltzoog in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.UDAI BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.{: SRI B.SUDHAKAR REDDY AND Ms NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI C.SAI KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2092 OF 2013 Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 0710412A04 CRP.MP.No.7O25 of 2008 passed in CRP.No.5269 of 2008 S.G. Sambandam & Co., Rep. by its Partner Sri T.S. Rajeswaran S/o. Shah- uga-Mudaliar, Waltair Uplands, Visakhapatnam. ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Petition er AND

1. Sri G.Ravi Mohan, Andhra Pradesh State Trad its Managing Director, having Office at Shkkar Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. ing Corporation Ltd., Rep. by Bhavan, Fathe Maidan,

2. Sri Ramakrishna, Phoenix Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Near Habsiguda G.E., Opp. NGRI 2nd Gate, Habsiguda, Hyderabad. ... Res pondents/Res pondents/Respondents l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL. NO: 1137 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to deposit a sum of Rs.7,65,0611- the credit of the E.P.No.134 of 2007 on the file of lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, and continue to deposit monthly rents payable to 1st respondent in the Court of lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above contempt Case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. UDAI BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Ms NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI C.SAI KUMAR The court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND SHAVILI LE SRI AND AND CONTEMP COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauili) When the matters are taken up for heariqg, it is noticed that main E.P.No.134 of 2OO7 was already disposed of on 17.ll.2Ol4. Trre present Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the interlocutory orders passed in E.P.No.134 of 2007. Since the main 8.P., itself is disposed of, cause in the present Civil Revision Petitions does not survive for e djudication.

2. Accor<lingly, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous and consequently, in view of dismissal of CRP.No.5269 of 2OO8, C.C.Irlo.2O92 of 2Ol3 stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,

1. The lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Sri B.Sudhakar Reddy, Advocate tOpUCI 3. One CC to Ms Neeraja Reddy, Advocate tOpUCI 4. One C3 to Sri D.Udai Bhaskar, Advocate tOpUCI 5. Two C) Copies h- NVB/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:08/01 12025 s () * 1 1 FIB ?tl26 y! COMMON ORDER CRP.Nos.4792 and 5269 of 2008 And CG.No.2092 of 2013 CRP'S ARE DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS AND CLOSIN{G THE CONTEMPT CASE ?D

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments