Pleader, by placing reliance on the judgment of Full Bench in Chinnam Pandurangam v. Mandal Revenue Oflicer, Serilingampally Mandal and othersl, has submitled Lhat be

Judgment

1. The State of Telangana, Eep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat,Hyderabad' 2 J 4 4 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Kongara Kalan Village, lbrahimpatnam, RR District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Revenue Division Ranga Reddy The Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Mohammed Afzal, S/o. Late lvlohammed Mahmood Aged about year, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Etla Yerravally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of ltrlandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in trying to placing the Sth respondent name in Bhu Bharathi Portal in respect of petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Ac.1.20 gts in Sy. No. 196/E, situated at Etla Yerravally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without considering the objections filed by petitioner on 13-06-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14,21 and 3004 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently directing the respondent No. 4 not to modify the revenue records by entering the sth respondent name in Bhu Bharathi Portal in respect of petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Ac.1 .2O gts in Sy. No. 196/E situated at Etla Yerravally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petitiorr unc€ r section-151 cpc praying that in th: circum,;tances stated in the affidavit f led ir support of the petition, tnu"|-1 ign Court ma,t be pleased to direct the respondernt N3.4 not to modify the reveriue records Lry _.ntering the 5th respondent narne ir Bhu Bharathi portar in respect of pelitioner ar lriiritri, r-irno to an extent of Ac.r.:21 gts in Sy. No. 196/E situated a: etf a ./:rravrffV Vifir,", Shabad Manclal Rar-ga Reddy tiistrict Counsel for the Prrti(ioner: SRl. M PHANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGp FOR REVENUE The Court macle the following: ORDER ) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 1 7271 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking following reiiel "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavrt, it is prayed that this Hon,ble Court. may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in trying to placing the 5rh respondent name in Bhu Bharathi portal in respect of petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Ac.1.2O gts in Sy_ No. 196/E, situated at Etla Yerravally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without considering the oblections filed by petitioner on 13-06-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 2l and 30oA of the constitution of Inclia and consequentty directing the respondent No.4 not to modify the revenue records by entering the Sth respondent name ih Bhu Bharathi portal in respect of petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Ac.i.20 gts in Sy. No. 196/E situated at Etla Yerravally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case-"

2. It is stated that petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Acs. 1.20 guntas in Survey No. 196/E, situated at Etla Yerravally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (for short, 'the subject land'), which is an ancestral property and acquired the same through par[ition and the petitioner's name was also mutated in the revenue records and pattadar passbook and title deed was also issued to the petitioner and her name is also reflecting in Dharani portal. It is further stated that the mother of the 5'h respondent hled a writ petition before this Courl uide W.P.No.27867 of 2O24 seeking to include her name in Dharani Portal in respect of the subject land and this Court disposed of the said writ petition uide order dated O4.7O.2O24 directing the mother of the Sft 2 CVBR, J ,4t .I'. .'[ o.17 2 7 1 of 2O25 respondent 1() f il,. z n online application before the D istr ct ( ollector, Ranga Reddy Distri:t rhr.o rgh Dharani Portal to correct the ,:ntrLes I y rncorporating her name in ll.rc r < r enue records and the petitioner is' no rl p arly in the said writ petition I: s .urther stated that the 5fr respor dent l-.e s submitted an application 1() rhi. llrd respondent uide Application N ;.R(l2lii( 0003843 dated

16.05.2025 rnrl -r: ;pondent Nos.3 and 4 issued notlcc ,c tl Le petitioner on og.06.2025 callir.l1 for objections and the petitioner file d c rjections before the 4d' respcr,]derr. ,.-;rt ),3.06.2025 requesting them Ilot t.r l)ilss any adverse orders u,ithc rrt c0 t rlucting enquiry. The grievance of tlre p :titioner is that the 4th resl)c,nd(r r l. is now trying to incorporate the ne me of the 5m responde nt Ln Blr _ Bharathi Portal in respect of th e sr,rtrje ;t land without conducting 21nv ,: tquiry and without considering lh: I rjections dated

13.06.2025 liled lr,' the petitioner. He nce, the present \vrit f)c tition.

3. I),rns;irl::rcd the submissions of the leirrnt:c < ounsel for the petitioner arrrl tc:rr |ed Assistant Government Pleader for fle:r enue appearing for responde t N r: . 1 to 4 and with their consent, th is r'r'rit I >etitron is being disposed at :'r' tL:ltrrission stage. In view of the nature oI rr:1 ef sought for in this writ pet lion, rr suance of notice to respondent Nc.5 is; rllspensed with.

4. L,r:irrrr,: 1 Assistant Government Pleader for Fle v:nue appearing for responde'r.rt Nlcs 1 to 4 contended that the mothtrr o1 tl'e 5d' respondent filed a writ F,clitrcrr beforc this Court uide W.P.No.27867 o1 2024 and this Court uide rr,&:r dated 04.1O.2O24 disposed of the szri I rvrit petition 3 CVBR, J W.P.No.17271 of 2025 directing the mother of the StI' respondent to file an online application before the District Collector, Ranga Reddy District through Dharani Portal and on receipt of the said application, the District Collector shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance wi[h law, by putting the I petitioner and all interest parties on notice and affording them an opportunity and therefore, in compliance of the said order, the respondent authorities have issued notice to the petitioner and called for the objections and after examination of the records, the respondent authorities will pass appropriate orders in accordanca. with law. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, by placing reliance on the judgment of Full Bench in Chinnam Pandurangam v. Mandal Revenue Oflicer, Serilingampally Mandal and othersl, has submitled Lhat belore correction/ amendment/change of the revenue records, a notice has to be issued to the interested persons, whose names are reflected in the revenue rccords.

5. In view of the above submissions ahd in view of the settled legal position, this Court is of the opinion that trefore conducting any enquiry over the subject land, the respondent authorities shall consider the objections submitted by the petitioner dated 13.06.2025 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act,2025. I AIR 2OO8 AP 15 '.t 4 CVBR, J \lt. F.1to.17271 of 2O25

6. \!'ith rt-,i above observations, the Writ I,etiticr is disposed of. - There shall be no tllcr as to costs. Miscellanr:c rs applications pending, if any, shall st::r.rcl rlosed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. OSMAN ALI BAIG o,oT TAIIT REGISTRAR ISECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Prirrr;ipal Siocretary (Revenue) Secretariat, Hyderabarl 2. The Dislrir:t Ccllector, Ranga Reddy District Kongara Kalan Vil age, lbrahimpatnarr , RR District.

3. The Rer,,enLre l)ivisional Officer, Chevella Revenue Divisicn Rt nga Reddy 4. The Tahsildar. {ihabad MandSl, Ranga Reddy District 5. One CC t S" L N4 PHANI KUMAR Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CCs to tiF' FOR RE /ENUE ,High Court for the litate, of T elangana. tOUI Two CD lopi::

7. KKS PVL \ HIGH COUR'1' DATED:2310ti12025 ORDER WP.No.17271 at 2625 .rF TF, L ''? e $'v {+ I s,) { DISPOSING 'THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUI-COSTS i_i j 'i ) / ,/ ( ) I ') ir! .< T