✦ High Court of India · 23 Jun 2025

A. Narasimha Chary v. Director

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,088 words

Acts & Sections

to release the i.c iyidual service connection without being inFluenced by the instructions ol th(r fir1 respondent lA NO: 'l OF 20;2ti Petitior uncer Section'1 51 CPC praying that in thr: circum:.;tances stated in the affidavit f led n support of the petition, the High Clurt ma) be pleased to direct the Respor(i,lits 2 to 7 lo receive the application and releese the individual service connect on trt the petitioner, the Plot No-0054, Pnaser-ll. rn Survey No.37, siiuated at Goparprr ly (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S Counsel for the Pr::itioner: Smt. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Re spondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for ther Respondent Nos.2to7: SRt N. SREEDHAR REDDy, Counsel for the, Respondent No.8: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN RECrDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL SC FOR GHTVIC The Court made thr: following: ORDER 1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.173O8 of 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is hled with the following prayer "To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner the Plot No'0054, Phase-ll in Survey No 37 situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mardal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangara State as illegal, null, void arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the 8th respondent"

3. Heard . the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Enerry for respondent No.1, Sri N'Sreedhar I Reddy, learned Stalding Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos 2 to 7 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.S and perused the record' / 2

4. Tt c S. same is r o matter c f Court in \\. well as th : Court to p |:trled counsel for the petitioner subrnits tha the subject rlri:; u'rit petition is squarery covered by the r,rder o1 this .i,. \o.32614 of 2015 dated 1g.12.2o15, arc re luesred this ass similar order in the present writ petrtion also. The . ;eriously disputed by the learned Governtnenr pleader as e tr r ed Standing Counsel for the responder ts. In vieir c f the above submissions and for the r.easons alike in the order ol th sr Court in W.p.No.326 14 of 2OlS dated 18. 12.2015, this writ r,c iiicn is disposed of permitfing the pe.titicner ,. fiI. ;; online appiicirt ot.l seeking electricity service crrnnectio I to the petitioner,s l)l ;t No.O0S4, phase_II in Survey Nc, 37, :iruated at Gopanpall,v Yi.la6e. Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Rr.dd,v District, Telangana Sitirt t. rvithin a period of one week frc "rrL weeK lrom ti)e dal, r[ rcceipt ^r ur a copy of r[1 1 6p616p. Upon receipt of such an ap])lication, respondent i,lcs 2 .o 7 are directed to consider the said appli,:ation of the petitiont:r .i>_ release of the electricity power sul:pllz to the petitioners' sur;; -'c t property within a period of two weeklr trr.reafter. It is howevcr obscr'cd that if respondent Nos.2 to 7 pass {)r,ie15 or., petitioner,s a;rptir:a I on granting release of the electricity pc,wer supply to the petitiont,r,r; subject property, the same sha_ll be subiect to further directi)r .1at may be issued by the State of Telangar_.a or the & I To, Honble Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated 12.9.2012 passed in Writ petition No.2O4O7 of 2OO8 and batch. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stald closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD D UTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER Department Secretariat, T.S.,Hyderaba d-500022

1. The PrinciPaI Secretary Power and Energ 2- Telanga Soudha Director , Hyderabad ReP' bY Manager, commercial Somajiguda na State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited Vidyuth its Chairman-cum- Managing Hvderabad Ranga ReddY District- Mint ComPound TGSPDC L, 3. The Chief General +. rilE"si,"o?,iintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution - d;;;;y iirii"o' Viov,itn souor'a, S-omajiguda'tlvderabad 5. The Divisionat engineer,''6[Eliii']i ei"ti'loi'*ti r c s P DC L' Ransa Reddv u. ?ltJ''it;.,r,unt Divisional Engineer, operation Gachibowli' T G s P DC L' 7. The Assistant Englneer, Operation Gachibowli' T G S P DC L' Ranga Reddy u. ?i,tJ''tt"ormissioner, Greater. tlyderabad Municipal corporation' " q 6";'C"Ci"" Srit. trAxu C'noo p( s t ruc u' A9'^o!qt' I oP u cl io biiE Ed i" s-Ci i. bRii'tji;F nLoot-S-q ion rcseocr 19I-q91' 11.one cc to sRl. c. rrilno-n-ti5r-iorinr{ ne-ooY' sc FoR GHMCIoPUCI 12.Two CCs to Gp fOn-ii'.f"e"n-Cn,ffrgh Court for the State of Telangana at 13.Two CD CoPies Senf inqampally Zone, Ranga Reddy-D.i9!rlgt'. , Hyderabad [OUT] BM GJP I I I I / HIGH Cr)gP1 DAIED:;23 tO6t2O2S CC TODAY \:.- l.'i s;rar, Cr L) N? c I) ORDER WP.No.1T3CIB of 2025 f,,i?rrsr# [].5'.{#. wR I r PE fl il o N ///z 2/ ,// /ls

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments