High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.0225lll, Phase-ll, in Survey No.37, situated at Gopanpally I (v), serilingamp,arry ( vr), Ranga Reddy District, T.s., as iilegar, nuil void, arbitrary and consequently c in: :t the respondents to receive appricaiion and to rerease the individual servics :ornection without being influenced by the instruc,.ions of the Bth respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition u'rcrer section 15'l cpc praying that in the r;ircumst:rnces stated in the affidavit filed irr jLrt,port of the petition, the High court rr,ay b,e pl,,rased to direct the Respondenls 2 r(,7 to receive the applicition and rerease the individuar service connecti,:r tcr the petitioner, the plot No.0225lll, phase-ll, in survey No_32, situated at Gopanlrall,r (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy Distrir t, T.S' Counsel for the P,stitic'ner: SRt. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the R,er;po.ndent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Rr-"s; condent Nos.2 to 7: SRI N. SREEDHAR RF:DD\/ SC FOR TGSPDCL 99yl:"t for the Res;1:cndent No.8: SRt G. MADHUSUDHAN REDD\. SC FOR GHMC The Court made the f,rllowing: ORDER i' 1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.17391 of 2o25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is hled with the following prayer: "To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more pa-rticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 tn not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner the Plot No.0225/ll Phase-ll in Survey No 37 situated at Gopar-rpa1ly Village, Serilingampally Mardal, Ranga Reddy Distnct, Telangana State as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of ttre 8th respondent".

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Enerry for respondent No.1, Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.8 and perused the record. 2 Ki

4. The lt a r rLr:d counsel for the petitioner submLts t :rat r-he subject matter of tlri,. r,,rit petition is squarely covered by the ol der of this Court in \V.P .'1c.326i4 of 2015 dated 18.12.2015, and reqrested this Court to prLss; :;imilar order in the present writ petilion also. The same is n rt s r:; iously disputed by the learned Govr:rnn'rent Pleader as well as thr-' lerrrned Standing Counsel for the resportden ts.

5. In r, ieu r,1 the above submissions and for the r':asc ns alike in the order o- [t-is Court in W.P.No.32614 of 2Ol5 dat,:d 18.12.2075, this writ p( t I icn is disposed of permitting the petit.ioner to hle an oniine atrrpli,:atLon seeking electricity service r:onnecti )n to the petitioner s l)lr t No.0225/II Phase II in Survey No 37 ;ituated at Gopanpal.l, \i il[]1ge, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga iedr'.y District, 'lelangane Sit:1e, within a period ol one week from the datr: of receipt of a copS 'l' tlris order. Upon receipt of su':h lrn : pplicaLion, responderLt Nor;2 to 7 are directed to consider the sar<1 aprtlication of the petitilr er br release of the electricity pov',er supply to the petitioner;' s, l1ect property within a period of Lwt wt:eks thereafter. It is howevt r ct,served that if respondent Nos.2 to 7 cass orders on petitioner's a-lJlication granting release of the electricity power supply to the peti'ioner's subject property, the same shall be subject to further di'e rtior that may be issued by the State of Te lan1:ana or the I Hon'ble Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated I2.9.2O12 passed in Writ Petition No.2O4O7 of 2008 and batch. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand ciosed. //TRUE COPYII SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSTSTANT REgIgTRAR sscrrpl'r{rrrcen To, #-

1. The Principal Secretary Power and Energy Department Secretariat, Hyderabad-500022.

2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director Telangana State Southern Power - OistriOution Comprny Limited", Vidyuth Soudh-a, Somajiguda, Hyderabad'

3. The Chief General Manager' commercial tvlint Compound TGSPDC L' Hyderabad

4. The superintending Engineer, Telangana state southern Power Distribution 6;F;y Limited, Vidylth Soudha' Somajiguda, Hyderabad'

5. The Divisional Engineer, Operation Gachibowli, TGSPDC L, Ranga Reddy District.

6. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Gachibowli, T G S P DC L' Ranga ReddY District.

7. The Assistant Engineer, Operation Gachibowli, T G S P DC L' Ranga Reddy District. B. Greater Greater Hyderabad Municipa! Corpgration, Rep by its Commissioner' Serilingampally Zohe, Ranga Reddy District'

9. One CC to SRl. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Advocate [OPUC] 10.Two ccs to GP FOR ENERGY ,High court for the state of Telangana. [oUT]

11.Two CD CoPies KKS . x.l.:-. :. HIGH COURI' DATED:24lAtl2025 ORDER WP.No.1739'l of 2025 CC TODAY /.. I' :: ::=::- () I ,l) rrll ?il25 7- .A DISPOSING'T'HE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COISTS r \? )