M. Krishna Murthy v. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more partic4larly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the r6cords pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.2012 , ii) Lr.No.B/'1210312O12 dated 16.7.2012 on the file of 2nd Respondent and consequentially quash (i) proceedings No . B/12103/2012 dated

16.7.2012,ii)811210312012 dated 16.7.2012 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and Provisions of A.P. Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 9 of 1 977. I.A.NO:1 OF 2012 (WPMP. NO:28652 OF 20121 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order No.B/12103/2012 dated 16-7-2012 issued by 2nd Respondent. !.A.NO:2 OF 2012 (WPMP. NO: 286 s3 0F 2012) Petitior Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice under Section 6 of A.P. Land Encroachment Act lll of 1905 issueJ by the rd Respondent vide Lr.No B/1210312012 dated 16-Z-2012. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO:22353 OF 2012 Between: G. Adlnarayana Sarma, S/o. G.V.Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 years, Occ;Bank Employee, No. 2-3-746, Nagole village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ......PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petiticn Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to ir;sue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.;2012 , ii) Lr.No.B/1210312012 dated 16.7.2012 on the file of 2nd Respondent and consequentially quash (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.2012 , ii) 811210312012 dated 16.7.20'12 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.P. Land Encroachment Act, '1905 and Provisions of A.P. Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 9 of 1 977. l.A.NO:1 OF 2012 (WPMP.NO:28654OF 2012 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order No.B/12103/20'12 dated 16-7-2012 issued by2nd Respondent. |.A.NO:2 OF 2012 (WPMP.NO:28655 OF 2q12) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the impugned notice under Section 6 of A.P. Land Encroachment Act lll of '1905 issued by the 2nd Respondent vide Lr.No.B/121O31 2012 dated 16-7-

2012. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO:22354 OF 2012 Between: G. Om Prakash, S/o. Shanaiah, Occ ; Bank Employee, No. 2-3-754, Nagole village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Deptt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ....,RESPONDENTS pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari callirrg for the records pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/12103i20,12 dated 16.7.2C12 , ii) Lr.No.B/1210312012 dated 16.7.2012 on the fite of 2nd Respondent and consequentially quash (i) proceedings No .B/1 2103/201 2 dated 16.7.2012 , ii) 811210312012 dated 16.7.2012 as being arbitrary, illegat, violative of article 14 aM 21 of rhe constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.p. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and Provisions of A.p. Assigned Land (prohibition of Transfers) r\ct 9 of ,l977. I.A.NO:1 O 2012 (WPMP.NO: oF 20121 Petitiorr under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the crrder No.B.11210312012 dated 16-7-2012 issued by 2nd Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Gounsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE :22355OF P. Muni Ranrudu,, S/o. P. Venkata Muni, Aged about 49 years, Occ ; private Service, RJo. 2-3-77811 , Nagole village, Uppel Mandal, Ranga Fieddy Districi. D

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Revalue Deptt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstancers stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to is;sue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/1 2103/2012 dated 16.7.2t012 , ii) Lr.No.B/t2103/2o12 dated 16.1 .2012 on the file of 2nd Respondent and consequentially quash (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated

16.7.2012 , ii) 8,11210312012 dated 16.7.20'12 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14 5c.21 of The Constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and Provisions of A.P. Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 9 of 1977. :1 OF 2O1 MP. NO F 12 Petition Under Section I5'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order No.B/12103/2012 dated 16-7-2012 issued by 2nd Respondent. l.A.NO:2 OF 20{2 {WPMP.NO:28659 OF 20 2l 1 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice under Section 6 of A.P. Land Encroachment Act lll of 1905 issued by the 2nd Respondent vide Lr.No.B/1 21031 2012 dated 16-7- 2012. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE :22356 OF C. Sudhakar,, S/o. C. Rama Rao Aged about 34 years, Occ ; Private Employee, Rl/o. 2-3-759, Nagole village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Deptt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.2()12 , ii) Lr.No.B/12't03 12012 dated 16.1.2!012 on the fite of 2nd Respondent and consequentially quash (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.2012 , ii, Bt1rr}r,rO12 dated 16.7.2012 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14 and 21 of rhe constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.P.Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and provisions of A.p.Assigned Land (Prohibition or' Transfers) Act 9 of 1977. I.A.NO:1 OF 2t012 (WPMP. N0:28660 OF 20121 Petition Under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit liled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice under Section 6 of Ap Land Encroachment Act lll of 1905 issued by the 2nd Respondent vide Lr.No.B/121o3t2012 dared 16-7-2012. LA.NO:2 OF,!012(WPMP. NO: 28661 OF 20121 Petition Under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit f iled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order No.B/12103/20'12 dated 16-1 2012 issued by 2nd Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 223,57 OF 2O12 Between: R. Somaiah, :S/o. R Sattaiah., Agedabout 45 years, Occ; Bank Employee, R/o.2_3- 787, Nagole village, Uppat Mandal, Rungs Reddy Diskict. AND 1 . The State of Andhra Pradesh, Bep. ny its Secretary, Revenue Depft., Secretarial Building, Hyderabad.'

2. The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....PETITIONER Petition Under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancers stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to is,sue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .....RESPONDENTS certiorari calling for the records pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.2012 , ii) Lr.No.B/1210312012 dated 16.7.2012 on the file of 2nd Respondent and consequentially quash (i) proceedings No.B/12103/2012 dated 16.7.2012 , ii) 8,11210312012 dated 16.7.2012 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.P. Land Encroachmenl Act, 1905 and Provisions of A.P. Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act I of 1 977. |.A.NO:'t OF 2012 (WPMP.NO:28662OF 2012l Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High iourt may be pleased to suspend the order No.B/12103/201 2 dated 16-72012 issued by 2nd Respondent. LA.No:2 oF 201 2 (WPllP.NO2l!003 !E20'!2) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice under Section 6 of A.P. Land Encroachment Act lll of 1905 issued by the 2nd Respondent vide Lr.No.B/121O31 2012 dated 16-7-

2012. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO:22358 OF 2012 Between: R. Bhupathi Rao,, S/o. Raghava Rao aged about 61 years, Occ Retired Lecturer, H.No.2-3-764, Nagole village, Uppal Mandal, R.R. District- .....PETITIONER AND 1 . The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Deptt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

2. The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to iss;ue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to (i) proceedings No.B/1 21O3t2012 dated 16.7.2012 , ii) Lr.No.Bl121O3l2012 dated 16.7.2012 on the fite of rd Respondent ztnd consequentially quash (i) proceedings No.B/1 210312012 dated 16-7.2012 , iit B.11210312012 dated 16.7.2012 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of lndia and contrary to provisions of A.p. Land Encroac;hment Act, 1905 and Provisions of A.P. Assigned Land (prohibition of Transfers) Act I of 1977. l.A.NO: 1 0F it012 (wP MP.NO:28664 oF 20121 Petitiorr under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit liled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order No.B/1210312012 dated 16-72012 issued by 2nd Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARENDER PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following COMMON ORDER I()1:.: t'-- I I i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION Nos.22352,22358,223,5,1,22355, 22356.22357 and,2235a of 2Ot2 COMMON ORDER: When these matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel flor the petitioners woulcl submit that after filing these writ petitions, the respondent authorities have regularized the lands of the respective petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.11B, Revenue (Assig.I) Department, dated 28.Lo.2o22 and in vierv of the sarne cause in the instant writ petitions does not survive and requestecl to close all the'writ petitions. 2- Recording the aforementionecl submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, these 'writ petitions are closed. No order as to costs 3- Itrliscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in thcse writ petitions shall stand closed. \ To SA BS //TRUE COPY// SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASStSTANIXEG|STRAR G SECTION OFFICER / : Iffi"?,r?:l:fiii,"- 2. ONE CC tO ShI UANCNDER PRASAD, AdVOCAtE IOPUCJ 3. Two CD Copies REVENUE, Hish court ror rhe state or reransana at UL HIGH COURT DATED:2210912025 riE 1 I 2 I JAt{ 2025 C: C) ( * COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.22352, 22353, 22354, 212355, 22356, 22357 An{D 22358 0F 2012 CLOSIN(3 THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS. @tlr*