High Court · 2025

Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia ,;S=r:?Ir,firll: circumstances stabd in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mnkramus decraring the action of the Respondent Nos.5 to / <#,,:., , ,/ 11-13-1O1Bl2,which 7 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty and also interfering into the peaceful possession of ffo"" of the Petitioner through vide House bearing No' is t'*"t"d at Road No'1/7' Green Hills Colony' Kothapet' Ranga Reddy O'tt''"t oVlottuding witn the Respondent NosB to 12 and supporting illegal activitilt"i' tn"-*"tpondent NosB to 12 and calling the Petitioner to the Police tt-u"on und detaining and threatening to handover the house of the Petitioner *o tn" *"tpondent No B to 12 during the pendency of civil suits between tne petitioner and Respondent Nos'B to 12 is illegal' arbitrary' uiofution of Articles 14' 15' 21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and also violation of erin"ipt", of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No 5 to 7 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty and not to interfere into civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos B to '12 and not to threaten the Petitioner to handover his House bearing No 1 1-'1 3- 1o18t2,which is siluated at Road No'1/7' Green Hills Colony' Kothapet' Ranga Reddy District to the Respondent Nos S to '12 during the pendency of civil suits unconstitutionaf '"0 tA NO: 1 oF 2025 in the Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated affidavit fileo in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to the Responclent No.5 to 7 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty direct andnottointerfereintocivildisputesbetweenthePetitionerandRespondent Nos.8 to '12 and not to threaten the Petitioner to hand-over his House bearing No. 11-13-1018/2, which is situated at Road No'1/7' Green Hills Colony' Kothapet, Ranga Reddy District to the Respondent Nos B to 12 during the pendency of civil suits pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' RAPOLU BHASKAR ior ttre Respondent Nos' 1to6: GP FoR HOME ;;;;.;i a;;;;;ifor the Respondent No'10: Ms' G'V'S'S'SRUTHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 7to9,11&12:- The court made the following; ORDER ,,'a ,r.!.{4,! ' 'ttryv OR D ER Heard Pleader for THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR w.P Io. I 7208 of 202s learned Counsel for Hom" ,pp...inp, for the petitioner, the official the lea_rned Government respondent Nos_ I to 6, counsel appearing for respondent No. IO, ald with Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at Ms. G.V.S.S.Sruthi, lcarnec their consent, the Writ admission stage 2' Having rcgeird to rhc n-,i'rnner- of crisposal of the writ petition a,,d the nature of 1ls involved, Lhis Court is oI the vie,,v that notice to unoflicial rcspondent Nos T 10 g' r r {k 12 is not necessafy for adjudication of the present Writ Petition 3 Kothapet, Ranga llc The case of the petitiorrcr, in brief, is that respondcnt Nos.S to 7 are interfering with his life :Lnd liberty including peaceful possession over house bearing No. I i-13_l 018/2 sit.rraied at road No.7/7, Green Hills Colony, dd-y District, .,vhich is a subject matter of a civil dispute t Oourt ol Civil jurisdiction, in collusion with respondent Nos.8 to 12, wiLhout ar'ry authority or sanction of law, which acdon it is contendcd as highly illcg:rJ arcl arbitr:ary. before the competen 4 respondents submits that respondent-authority ..rr.ld Per contra, Iearneci Gcvernment pleacler for Home appearing for offrcial the 10th rcspondent had approached the 6th gave a complaint, dt.11.06.2025, against the or the afor,;said complaint being lodged, the entry ald calied the petitioncr for the purpose of petitioner herein; and r_ha1 authorities have made a GD ,. 1:.'r': ' preliminary enquil-'\' to verify the correctness or othenvise of the contents of the comPlaint lodge d Learned Gorcrnment Pleader further subrnits that during the course of 5. pretiminary enquilv' the authorities having r'earr-rt of thc disirute to be a subject matter ol: sr-tit before the competent Courl of Civil jurisdiction' closed the aforesard compla.int lodged by the 10tr, respondent as 'ci'i1 in nature" on 20.06.2025 and issucd lntimation to the complainzr.rrt of tlre action taken on his comPlaint Learnt:d Go!(rrnment Plcacler fitrther sullmit-s tha'' the respondcnts- 6. au[horities except ca*sing preliminary e,quirl, into the complalnl lodged by the 1od, rcspor-rdcnl .rre not inter-fering irr thr: c:ir,il ciispr.rtes that may exist between thc pctitloller arrd the unofhcial resllondenls or interfering with the life and liberty or possession of the petitioner over the subiect irouse' 7 The aforesaicL submission made by the lcarnecl Goveinment Pleader for Home is tal<cn cltl ri cord In vrerv ol thc aforesald submissiotrs maclc tu'rd tal<ing note of the fact 8. that the auLhorities having initially received a cornpJaint from the 10th respondent on 11.06.2025 ar-rd after carrsinS preliminery enquiry, having closed the sairl :omplaint as "civil in naturc" ort 20 06 '2025' this Court is of the view that the rcspondents-authonties eLre to be dircctod not to interfere in the civil disput,rs that may cxisl betwecn thc petitioncr ar-rd the unofficial respondents. In thc cvent of any complairlt beillg lodged against tlre petitioner attracting the pro'isions of criminal larv, thc responde,ts-authorities are directed to take lilrlher action, striotly in zrccorcl:ur:e wrth,aw. 'Em.lilifWz Ys{.. /' ,-l:. J ,..1-' a

9. 3 Subject to the above dir-ectrons, the Writ petition is disposed of.. No ordcr as to cos t b. I l 10 closed Consequently, miscellaleous petltions, if any, pending shall stand //TRUE COPYII SD T SRINIVAS A REDDY TANT RE GISTRAR

2. 3. T.S., The , Telan gana, Hyderabad

1. The Principal S Hydeiabad Director Ge ECTION OFFICER ecretary, Home Department, Secreta riat Building, Secretariat, neral of police The Commissio ner of Police, Rachakonda Rachakonda Co m m is sio nerate, Ranga Redd y District The Assista nt Commissioner of Police L.B.Nagar Division, Rachakonda Com mtssion erate, Ran ga Redd y District. The Deputy Commissroner of police, L.B.Na 9ar Circle, Rachakonda Com mtssionerate ,RA nga Redd y Distri ct The Station House Officer, Chaithanyapuri police Station, Ranga Reddy District One CC to S RI, RAPOLU B HASKAR One CC to M s. G.V.S.S. SR UTHI Ad Two CCs to GP FOR H OME ,High Hyderabad OUI Two CD Coptes Advocate [OpU vocate [o PUCI r the State of Telangana at Court io I To,

4. 5

7. 8. o

10. BM LS HIGH COURT DATED:23 t0612025 ORDER WP.No.17208 ot 2025 I I nl ( ir a ,,.) 2 5 SEP ?fffi ,l I ! \-- .: .l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS /,/r ? /2 1 I