✦ High Court of India · 23 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Jun 2025
Length
1,139 words

Acts & Sections

Judgment

1. 2 3

5. 6 .....PETITIONER represented by its principat Secretary to the Civil If __S'$" "f,Ttangana, supp es and Consumer Affairs Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Additional Collector Cum EOED, Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation, Nizamabad Diskict, Nizamabai. Jl'9 Pistrlct Manager, Tetangana State Civit Suppties Corporation, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. The District civir suppries officer, Terangana state civir suppries corporation, Nizamabad Diskict, Nizamabad. The Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation, Represented by its Vice Chairman and.Managing Director, Civil bupplies Bhavan, Block_B, somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Commissionel Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation, Civil supprres tshavan, Block-B, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ decraring the action of the respondent authorities in not taking any steps and not passing any orders considering the representation filed by the petitioner dated 04-04-202s for payment of the amounts which the petitioner is entifled i.e., milring charges, transportation charges, custodian charges, administration charges, hamari and driage i.e., (depreciation 1 kg per quintal on paddy) from the year 2o14-1s Khariff to till date and also pay the storage, hamari, transportation and other charges for storing the I I stock and deduc: th: camaged quantity stock of paddy for the Rahi 2022-23 ' lo calculate the valtre c{ :he same and inform its value enablirg the petitioner to pay the balance if any p:yable by him, by duly accounting the charges Rs 200/- per quintal for the cn'lp Flabi 2021-22 Season, is nothing but arbitra'y, il egal, null and void and violatiorr ,rf p rinciples of natural justice and also violative :tf the Articles 14, 19 and 21 ol Lhr> (lonstitution of lndia. Consequently direct tl"re respondent authorities to co rsidt: the representation of the petitioner dated 0'4-04-2025 fot payment of the amouttts which the petitioner is entitled i.e, milling charges, transportation cf argoli custodian charges, administration charges,, hamali and driage i.e., (deprr:cialior '1 kg per quintal on paddy) from the year 2t:)14-15 Khatilf to till date and alsc: :z y' the storage, hamali, transportation and oth,,rr charges for storing the stock erncl cleduct the damaged quantity stock of padd','for the Rabi 2022-23, to calculater the value of the same and inform its value enabling the petitioner to pa1 "he: t)alance if any payable by him, by duly a()counting the charges Rs. 200r- per ' ouintal for the crop Rabi 2021-22 Season I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Urtder {ir:ction 151 CPC praying that in the circurnstatrces stated in the affidavit filec in support of the petition, the High Court rray tte pleased to direct the respond,:nt:ruthorities to conslder the representatior of the petitioner daled O4-04-2O2li 'or layment of the amounts which the petitioner s entitled i.e., milling charges, tr€tnsportation charges, custodian charges, :ldministration charges, hamali ;ard Cr age i.e., (depreciation 1 kg per quintal cn paddy) from the year 2014-15 Kharif' to till date and also pay the storage, hanralr, iransportation and other charges fc,r' storing the stock and deduct the damaged quirntity stock of paddy for the Rabi it-O',22-23, to calculate the value of the sarne i,rnd inform its value enabling the p:titioner to pay the balance if any payable by him, by duly accounting the char-or-. s Rs. 200/- per quintal for the crop Rabi 2)21-22 Season. Counsel for the Fetitioner : SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respr:ndent No.2 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respr:ndent Nos.3 to 6 : SRI K.DEVENDER The Court made the following ORDER THE IION'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRITPETITION No.l72 05 of 2025 ORDER This Writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.04.2025 for payment of the amounts to which the petitioner is entitled from the year 2014-15 Khariff and also ro pay rhe srorage, hamali, transportation and other charges for storing the stock and deduct the damaged quantity of stock of paddy for the Rabi 2022-23 and to calculate the value of the same and inform its value, enabling the petitioner to pay the balance if any is payable by him. 2 t Learned Standing Counsel fbr Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation, on written instructions, submiued rhat the milling charges have,been paid upto 2017_201g season and that the transportation charges have been paid upto 2022-2023 and the balance t I is yet to be considered by the Govemment. It is further submitted that the petitioner has to make a representation to the respondents No.l and 5, who will consider the same I I &

2. t 1/ )05 2425 J 3 Lr:iunt:rl counsel for the petitioner seeks libertl trr make a fresh repre;enrirr ion in addition to the representation datr:d 0.t.04.2025 and prayed that ]re respondents be directed to consider tlre same

4. Iu r ic',r' o1- the above, this Court deems it fit .lrr[ proper to dispose of rhis \\ rit Petition at the admission stage, .lrantir-rg libcfty to the petitiorer'1o rnake a fresh representation to the r,:sponderrts within a period o-or: 'l)week from the date of receipt of e copy ol this order and on lc'ccipt of such representation, the responrlents are directed to trrl ,r r decision on the same within a perio,,l of three (3 ) weeks ther:afte r rnd communicate the decision to tht: petitioner

5. Wit;r tlLc above directions, this Writ Petition r; clisposed of There shall be n r order as to costs 6 Mis-:r' laneous applications, if any, pending in ,,his Writ Petition, sl' ali st red closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. M.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT' REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Principal ! e :<:retary to the Civil Supplie-s and Constlmet Aff;;'irs' " n"-".t.e,it. s,,::'etariit BJildings, Stdt6 of Telangana qt Hyderabad 2. i;5il;[i;i, t:,,rr"Ctot Cum EbEo' Telansana State Civil supplies -' Coiporation, t'.1 zamabad Diskict, Nizamabad' /d'Lb --7 ! I I l l I i I tr$5ffi i:"#; :rl":" #il:ff :"J":.,"# iffflflffiHiltr*fiT*$ffffiffi il m if L:ifl r XEUH##p{iaA::rTLrBEi "I SA PSK l HIGH COURT DATED:231AGt2025 C.C. TODAY t I 1 STI,f€ ( \\' )t' ' \, o O 2$ iu\{ Nt ! // { F.: D/\-i', ',,./ ORDER WP.No.17205 of 2025 DISPOSING O,F THE W.P AT THE STAGiIH OF ADMISSION WITHOUT CO$TS. \ I, t \--I 0 ( -t p >0

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments