✦ High Court of India · 24 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Oct 2025
Length
1,223 words

Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri. Damodar Mundra Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Stamps And Registration The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JUKANTI AII L KUMAR CoNTEMPT CASE xqJ3q4-sf-2Q'l I ORDER: This Contempt C:rsc' is lilcd rvith the lollc't -'11 I)ra-\'er: ''... mav lrc pleascd to summon respor( arrrl putrish him for u-ilfully vtolatirii' orcic'rs of the IJonble High Court W.l'.No.2l 186 of 2O23, datedl9 OB 20 ' c:nt

2. Bl an orclcr. darted 19.O8.2023, iearned !i r11lt: Juige of tlrrs Cour-t passe rl the follou'ir-rg order ''Lc:Irr'<l counsel for thc petitioners states l pr.u suan('e of the value f rxed thrr.rugh t Il : Inspccriitttt Rcl)ort, :l Sale cleed was cxecut( ( vclrr 2(lls l,earrlecl cout-iscl statcs t[]at Il' ' r csrrlr'nturl rate rs fixe d ri Rs.4ti,700/- per I arrrl tlie sirrrlc 1s applic:lble. Learned counse that rn tll(t light of thc observations mad': R( !,rsr, rrr Atllllorllv itscll altcr spol insp(''' ttrc propcrtv is locatcd in thc rcsidential Ioce t Registeii,',g Authorit]'is at liability to colle-:' cluiv at thc rate allplicable to the residentral i l)ul not itl commerci;rl rate. lat lr) SI)ot r t lrc . tlre .r irt tI ,iilt(is i t lrc : thilt .: tlr-' 1:un ]l c irli t 1' I [:rlrng considcled all the submissions thr:: arrrrl ttpott he:rt-tng Iearned Assistartt Gor cL Plerrder for Stamps and Registratiou, who i clisPut,: alirnt the Spot InspecLion condtitt' r,:g,rrd to thc subjcct property and thc l' givc,n. this Court considers desirablc to d's1 Ihc Wnt Pr:titiotr givLng dircction to thc Rt gi ALlth()rt\ 1o coilect thc stamp dutl'\irth drtt t(, r t'1,' l,r^, ( cdtr)gs tssu,'d oll Spot lnsllectin ' I{t'r:cc. lhc \\Irit Pctition is disposecl ol v rrarle tncr'l t i r1oI u,it lr ctr r-rgs rsc (rf c ri rrg t 11ard tr tirc fr>llou ing directrrttr:- 2 oI Respondcnt No.5 i.e., thc Joint Sub-Registrar 7, Sar-rj eevaredcly Nagar, Hyderal)ad, is directed to takc Lr.No.324lSRNACAR/2017. dared 23.1 l.2O17 and the hndings given rlrrough Sl)ot Inspection of the subject property anri (hereirlLcr Lo llx melrkct \,a1rre and enterLairl the subjeCt docrLment ftrr regrstration if tlre samc is fou nd in complrtnce r\.lth thc prot'rsions of thc Rcgistratiol) Act, 1908 and lndial Stanrp Acr, 1899. " letter

3. As per the directions of learned Single Judgc-, it appears that no Spot Inspection was conducted. After filing of contempt case, a spot inspection on 08.10.2025 \\'as [aken up the concerned authoritics. Bv letter bearing No.282lSRNAGAR/2025, dated 15.1O.2025, addressed from the office Sub-Registrar, Sanjeevareddl, Nagar, to the Office of District Regrstrar, it r,r,as decided to lix the market value, AS per directions of Court in W P No.2I 186 of 2023. Thc contents of the said letter, dated 15.10.2025 are as follo\r,s "lt is submitted that the rcsidentirrl rate lor the said locality as on thc date of kccpirrg them pending is Rs.48,700/- per square ,lard ald Commcrcial Ratc is Rs.93,OOO/- pcr squarc vard. Now the petitioncr through C.C.No.l3O4 of 2024 datcd 08.07.2024 has hled contempt o[ thc court proceedings for not ted<ing :rction as per the the Hrgh Court passed in directions of W.P.No.21 186 of 2023 datect I9.08.2023. The then Sub-Registrzrr Sanjeevzu-eddy Nagar also inltrated to for frxing of resiclential value to the above mentioned houses through 6'h re[crence cited above. \ \ 3 Spot it-tspcclion cotlcluctc rl b-\' thc lherl t llegistrtr l1,y-clerabarl Soutll. Distri<:t R' Hvilcr , Ltrad (Audit arlcl lu'larket Va|'te ) a;r I Rcg,"t,,,r, San.;ccr arecldl- \agar vide 7'h itf , tlr'.1 ,,j,.r.r'sl;llllrg ll)irl III- itlrnle Incnlioni" nurll)( i s :tt-e itl resitlctltiiil loc alrtv and mo 100 rrr rc:s ',..'-p firrtrr thc ;n;litt load 'l 1r' Clortttttissiolit l- ancl itts;.rector Gelrr Rer,.:str,rLiotr itrtrl Starnl;s H'clcrabad arlso irlit ' rcctifi(,It1.)r1 ()f alronl:rl)' oI thc ''aluc to tlr hous. riurlbcrs throllgh 8rlr rcfcrencc cited lll) \s I)( r ilrstnlcittllls of tllc- (iovernment Plt I [{re,}r (.,)urt. otrt'c aqltirt sl)ol. inspectton c()] lrr :lrl L)rsrricL Reqistrar []vrlcrabad South l Rcgrstr,rr Ilvclcr.rir;Lrl (Audir a:rd \1:rrl<ct !':Ll r Suir-li,'qistr:rr Serllccva-rt:clcly Nag:rr r t i that thl: refr''.t t,, e t ttctl abotc si:itillg rrrt:ntr, rr'il !rortse nrtmtrcrs itrt: in residenti:rl l an(l | )i c thltn 1r-)0 nlet('rs a$'a\' lrom th' roa cl. :i lflct I s tr.Ir Sub- ) OLI SE rrl c.f ,rd l.) ,c. Ic t- rt-t ,lc'tC( I sl ric t ian(l 4'il r bo.,'e crrliLy inai;-r \ r,ll i ' rcfttretrc t t ilc':l itll<,lr'e thc (lor t I Ple;r,l.r .,r Iltglr t .'Ltrl nI T, l,rr']g.,'rnr itlslruc ' ' thc \l ,rk.r Vllu. ,() thc ,rl:,tYe mcnliont I rlurnlr. rs :ls pct clircctLon of Higir (lr I Telarrgrrir:r rncrltiolted in thc l'' rcfercncc citc I rren t io lir ]OLISC r of llt r','t:. it is reqttcstccl to fix thc ma,:ket \ i thc lr.asc bt'aring No.7 1'154, 7-1-455 irrr .15ir/ \ ol Amt-'crpel ils Per thc directions of t r Cor rr t rt \! I) Nri.2l I 86 of 2023 clatcd 19.08 l lle to 7l .r3." ) ) [t is obst'rvecl from t]re collLents of said lc 1'er that Sub- 4. Registral rcqtlestecl District Registrar to fix nr rket !'alue to house bearitrg Nos.7-l -454, 7-l-455 and 1-'+55/A of i Ameerpct as pcr the ciirectior-rs ol this Court.

5. In vict o[ spot inspection and in vieq' l' conterlts of Ictter, date(l I ;. 10.2025, this Court deems it a1 rropriatt: that 4 Contcmpt Case bc closed, AS spot inspcction lras been conducted and requesL has been made bl concerned autl-rorities to District Registrar to fix market r alue of the rcsidential propert\'. 'l'his Court is ol the vics' that a direction bc issued to District Rcgistrar to pass orders. The District Registrar is directcd to pass the procecdings rvithin a period of four (O4) rveeks from lhe clate of receipl of a copl' of this orcicr

6. With the above observations, this Contempt Case is closed. There sha-ll be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if anv are pendir-rg, shall stand c Iosed Sd/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHA DEPUTY R //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, TL 1 One CC to SRl. DAMODAR MUNDRA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:2411012025 ORDER CC.No.1304 of 2024 -.i Es lnji: i\ ,.'C o c) 1 iEB 201[ v * \-::: : -- -:2' CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE u ak

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments