The High Court · 2025

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS AND Aravind Kumar Tharad, S/o late Surender Kumar Tharad, Aged about 48 years,Occ: Business,R/o H.No. 6-3-'1 176/1, B.S.Maktha, Begumpet, Near Gokul Residency, Hyderabad-50001 6. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYPLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron '1 51 of C.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the warrant of commission in pursuance of the order dated.04.03.2025 in IA No.397 of 2023, in O.S.No.62 of 2023, between Arvind Kumar Tharad vs. RNK Agro and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and 2 others, before the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal tr/alkajgiri District, at N eredmet. . ". 5- ---- : ..,,.i:- ' *.: --a, r1.::Ir' Counsel for the Petitioners :SRI SHARAD SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent : SRI ARVIND KUMAR AGI,RWAL The Court made the following : ORDER THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA CIVIL REVISIONP NNo.1 5O of 202s III :jllar.it.l Sallgllr l\{r 1n:n4 i1u,,,.,, , lcanttd r.otutscl lbr tllc pchtioners. \q.,,1r rl t,.jrIrr(,Ll ,,,,rrs,.1 tur rlrn |cslrorrrlctrt ORDE& {[,(f ll,]r).bl.,jrsn(.( AloLtsirLlnll IJhaLrachar],al I . Thc Civii Reviston I)ctitiolr arises out of an orcier passed b-y I AdcliLronal Scni<:lr Civil ..luclgr,, Mecichal_Ma.lkajgiri District at Nt'rcclrncl (,thr..l.ri:,rl Cour_t) on 04.03.202.5 allou,ing I.A.No.397 of 2O23 in O.S.No.(r2 ot )O Z.)) trtc,cl b.t. rhe plain trlf/ respondcn r hc'rcitl lirr zrPPoin Irr.rc.n t ol :i11 [11i.6,1;r1e Conrmissioncr in rcspect of thc Sr_rit Schcdulc I)rol)crt_\. '2. 'lhr.l peLittotrcrs bclbrrr lhis Corrrt are thc dcl.cr_rdanl.s in thc suit. 'fhc sr_rit u.zts lllccl Ir.rr rhe rr:liefs of dcclaration of titlc aud plainliff also prayed Ibr mandatory rccove rv of posscssiol .l,ltc irtju rtctiort ancl rrre.sne 1>r.olirs.

3. I havc. hcarcl k,itrnc<l c.ounsr:l appcanng for the counscl appcaring for the pel.itioncrs/clclendants :rn<j lcar_necl lespon dr:n t/ pl:rin tit. -t-Y'4rTffiflSiEt - + t-t? L. !.*',qE-i \- \ 2

4. The plc:rclrngs in lhc llr'('s.r1.l I Civtl llcr is]()l l,(.Ltli()n lnake it clear thaL the plaintil-i lilecl thc IA [or ap1r, r )trn(']r1 . f an Advocatc Comrnissioncr on lhc basis of existr: I of ;t sr:r-ious dispute rviLh regarrl lo lot'aliotr and iclentillclrl r I ol-Lhc SuiL Schedule PropcrLr'. li'ur'l hcr, tt-re 'l'rial C< L r r(t(.orcl.j in paragraph No.14 ol tltc irnl)Lisr.t(-(l ordcr lhal llrr lch'rtrlants in their writtcn stzltcrncltl (1tirraqr'aplt Nos.l6 :rrrrl rrsscrlr:cl tltat thc Suit Schcclr-rlc [)ro1;r'rtv prrrc:hasccl b1. thr. r1,,,, tri: rL NO. I is drfferenl r,r.it n rcgard to l;orrnclaries of the prol;r'r. , .trtr1 []1n: 1[16 dr:fe ndants also plcaclccl th.,1t Lht: Suit Sr:hc'rlL , I)r-rrpcrlr is difficrenL lrorn lhc pr()[)(.rt\ orl rrcc] trr thc clcfcn<il r ; \o 1 ]t s,as aclditionally plcaclr:cl th.rt thc dclcndarnt No.1 1-lrr rotlrir-rg rr do with the Sujt Schcdulr: Propcrtv. The'ft-ial CoL r iLlLou,ccl the plaintiffs applicalt.ion on lhc b:rsrs of thc plr.r,lirrp,s in the Written Stirtctncnt :rrtrl lt], reason of tl:, rlr,li,rtrliLnLs, acknowledging o[ :r clrsprrtc u'iti.r t-cgar<] to rdi:n r .;rtiotr ol the Suit Schedule Propertv

5. The Writtcn St:)lcmCllt is not ort rc<:or, i lrrrl lceLrned counsel appearing [ol thc petitioners / dcl'e ncli r r; hirs fiLirll, I I I submitted tha[ the defenclants did raise a dispute with the bounclurie.s oi.the Surt Schcrlrrle propc_.rtr,. regard to

6. Order XXVI Ruie 9 of rhe CpC provides lor apporntment of an Advocate Corlmissioner and gives discretion to the Court to allow for such appointment jn a dispute with regard to the boundaries of the sublect-matter of thc suit.

7. Advocatr: Comr-ltissioncr In thc prt.scnL c.tse, the Trial Court allowecl the plaintiffs application .., n Lltc Ll..lsis of.thr. dcle ncl:lnts, ow.n p.lcadings in the Written SL.,ttclucnt of such a disputc bcing in exisLence. Hcnce, this Court docs not finfl 2ny error in the rcason given by thc Trial court lor allou'irrg the ap,lication f.r appointment of a,r 'fhis Cor_rrt also lails to See any patent error in tlte g1,c11g nhere the Advocate Commissioner is appointcd, sjncc it rvould be necess:try for the Advocate Commissioncr to asccrtain thc bounclarics of the Suit Schedule Property, particularly rvhere thc rclief in the suit is for deciaration of titlc and recovery oi.possession. t t 4 Y.

8. l'hc dccisions cilccl on lrch:rll' ol ll)c lt('1iLr lc,rs \\.('r-(' olt diflererrt frrcts. ArrrlttC Kttntor Aqanucrl u. l,erK,trtl1..sf.tr(,.s (p1 Ltd.. Rartga Reddtl Distttct, tlclerrtltrul nt.tl(('s i li,:r. tltut :rn Advocate Conrmissioncr car)ltot lrc. altltorntc<l at tl , llrlt sholil :rs thc same rvill amount to gal hcring c,,,idcr.rc:r' iutrl ' r h u,hen .ltt'rc rcmarns aml)iquitv s,ith rcgarcl lo i(l('rltitl of lh, li.o1,r,r.tr.. :rft(' r borl'r thc piirtics havc' :rd<lrrcccl rhcrr- r-r's1rcc.1i., L,, IrIt.rrL.i'. llrc Advocate Corntnissioncr r':.rrr lrr' lrltltorntr,rl .. 1t r lgrrr' 1 to address sur:h amltiguitv. K.l?rt.[ic1 Bctsltrt r'. \, lrrlt,uu I.!ctrnrt Kns hna and Other{ rnirkes it cl(.:ir-lltart:ts tlrt'r'r' ,. irs l() rlisltrr[c: b_r the othcr partl u,itl'r rcgar<1 Lo tlr<' l;orrnciin.ii,:, I rltr lll oltcrt\,, tl-tc appoilltment of thc Aclr.,Ocltlc ('onIr .si(rrrt I \\.ts un$rarranLe(l.

9. Unlikc 1l'rc prcscnI c:ls(], ltollc ol'llrc it]:or( .,,n(l (li,cl:irons contemplatcd any clisputc bcing r-aiscd l.lt tlrc' rlr ( r)(lirrlrs \\.itll regard to boundarics of thc Suit Sr:l-rcdulc Propcr. . 'l l.ris C,rurt, accordingly, does not find an1, n.rcrit tn Lhc 1>rr':;, tr (lllp or:tr.rv 'zors 121 nro zoo ? 2024 SCC OnLine AP 3865 , I a ,.'. 5 reason to interfere r,vi th the impugned order of the Trial Court dared 04.03 2025

10. C.R.p.No. I950 of 2O2r, along with all connected applications, is ar:corclingl-1 rlisrnisscd. Intertrn orders, if sny, shall stand \1acated. Therc shail br_,no or_t1cr as to costs. SDi. A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTR-Aii //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER J To, , ;?&f;3i:i1,,!;",Atn,""a I sen ior c ivit J udse, r\redcha I rva tkajsiri

2. One CC to SRt SHARAD SANGH|, Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to SRt ARVTND KUMAR AGARWAL, Advocate tOpUCl 4. Two CD Copies Pcsd/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2210812025 ORDER I I t. 2 7 ii,l ?M I : l:.. '-i).. a.t 4) :; .... ,., CRP.No.1950 of 2025 -l:- . ,.,:.. DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION b \,