✦ High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Aug 2025
Length
1,022 words

FIR 4 t.'i the Principlers of Natural Justice and consequently to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to efi'ectively investigate into the matter in FIR No.214t2O13 dated 11- 112013 of F'.S, Medak (T), Medak Dist., to file charge sheet before the Honble JFCM Court, Medak, so as to enable me Honble court to pass. 1 Petition undbr Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the re,spondents 3 & 4 to immediate investigation and enquiry against the respondents; No. 5 to 7 by way of anest; pending disposal of the above writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.V,RAM NARESH KUMAR 0,ror pREsENr) Counsel for the Respondent No.l to 4: SRI SRIDHAR BHUVANAGIR|, The Court rnade the fotlowing: ORDER , . " AGPT FOR HOI,IE , ,i , i i I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I 1 I I i i I : :,, + t ,,I ,: .i 5 ' a. +1.+-1..+.&: ' .i-:. ;_.; r, . 4':": .'..;:: ..i'-i:, ,.qt$j ,ffiF.:,,. #E+: ':; .:.+ .,i:..; . :: ...-, ,3 .: 6:i. ffii;-' t..rr '+iF.i,.,. ,1! -:it'j:! '+i " .. r. .. .ri.i.' .: j. ,; ,.{ii::ii. C.}i$}t,.{ij ..+ : i i. " ." , . - .. j .: :filJ'lii. .#ii+*?Af . d. r i., i :'t;.i::*:. .; O TIIE IIONOIIRABTT SRI JIISTICE VAI{ITI RA*IAKRISXT.|A RTDDY ORIIER: Heard sri sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4. However, t}rereisnorepresentationonbehalfofthepetitioner

2. Ttris Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in taking further action hr pursuance of the FIR No.2l4l2olg dated 11.11-2OL3 registered at Medak Town Potice station and their failure to investigate into the matter by arresting tlre respondent Nos.S to 7 or to transfer the case in crime No.2l4l2ol3, Medak Town Potice Station to CBCID, Hyderabad, for investigation and enquiry, as illegal and arbitrary and to consequently direct tlre respondent Nos.3 and 4 to effectively investigate into the matter in Crime No.2l4l2o13 and file a charge sheet ttrereon before the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medak'

3. When the matter carne 2f3.O8.2O%, learned Assistant up for hearing todaY i.e., olr Government Pleader for Home appearingforreryondentNos'lto4,placedonrecordthestahls report of the FIR No.2L4l2ol3 and the investigation conducted pursuant thereto. He further submitted try*t after condtrcting the \ \ \ ! i I i I l. . : ; ' i I I i;i I i i i i i t I I t i i l I \ \ I a 4 i 2 \ \ t\ \ \ investigatit)n, a charge-sheet was also liled by the police on the file of Principal j'unior civil Judge-cum-rudiciat Magrstrate of First class, Medak vid,z cc/00009g6/2o14 and subsequently, tJre accused in the said case were acquitted under section 2agel of code of criminal Procedure uide judgment dated og.o2.2o2s passed by the principar Junior civ:il Judge-cumJudicial Magistrate of First class, Medak. 4- In view of the aforesaid subrnission, since the grievance of the petitioner has already been met, the cause in the present writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closrtd. To, /ffRUE COPY/ SD'. M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI B.V.RAM NARESH KUMAR, Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderrabad toufl

3. Two CD CoPies BSR GJP N7 , J, HIGH COURT DATEDi 2810812025 RDo ER. \l . ,.,i- WP.No.14846 of 2014 ..:i .'. 'r,, r 'r..:.;i :;: :i*. .Il i ',"',iffi,i iti t, .. ,.... .. . ', t,rr,,,,t", , i -: n N , g DISMISSING THE WRIT, PETITIO : ,,+,,i-rritiri$i++1i!-.. .t-1.-.,r #i = i AS INFRUCTUOUS,',1+i1:j , 'rr.: ' {i.it' .,,,e:*;* {1 r ,.- '::' r ,.,,....... .d l ,, . r'- '=: ar .1 r ' '44' f. I 'i. ,4.. .,i._c. _ i ':.c,iEt"'l *? i: r" ,q.{iiio G | ,r*, = ,l . .r..... .-i.iq?t:,iE:;i+.j:: , ,i ,., .t . .- ...t:. i.r.i.r+!r+.:" " : :..,. l- ;.X1,.. .S a t : * i ..*,:- 'rl'_' " @ **"" N{ ,r\\" i I aI I I I I t I t I I I I t i I I i i , 1 : I a i i i. 1 [, l:.-. ,l,' 3 ?$ lNffi t * PAT { i'r E.E--.- i.5'{ir.t. ?1, *'+ ,:, . .: ' it.il:! ,., '.:..,-- .,.t ;- , ,i;* \, \ Y { s. {t: ,rl:!, -tS ..',\;-: : ' -:.:i. i.'+*c .. _:.1: . , ..:.t !j: .;1. t't+iri*e - -nxi;';"' :.+. : 'i i 't, E; i a '1. t r'L; . . , ,.. l'-.s :. +,. 1r r i:';iJ-i'. .^ftr.} -:; i -.,'-i'it:},1 . ,. , *.....,, .';..21 ' '1,,.:.. *,.r]?1E-nr,, ' r . , J_ -. r ,r r'!:. : .L.;".:

7. , t* .. i:. i .n I - r; l- ':'"''' .r-:: i ,, ^ *.s .{ ' .,jr+:., , 1*.' ,, ,1,,, t li.* : ',.&!tF;i

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments