✦ High Court of India · 23 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,061 words

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not processing the application of the Petitioner to provide 11 Domestic connections, total Domestic contract Load of 55000 watts vide Reg.No. LTM252150088 connections to the petitioner in respect of the Residential Building, plot No. 0260, in survey No.37, situated at TNGOS Cotony, Phase-ll, Gopanpally (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga i-l - Reddy District T.S. \nd not providing electricity connectic,n to the above referred premises as illegal irn i arbitrary. lA NO: 1 OF 2021' Petition unCr:r {ieclion 151 CPC praying that in the circumst:rnces stated in the affidavit filerj in r; rcport of the petition, the High Court nay :e pleased to direct the respondent; 2 1c 7 to process the application of the retitioner to provide 1'1 Domestic Conn:cti:rrs;. total Domestic Contract Load of 55000 watls vide Reg.No- LT1U252150088 co-rerctions to the petitioner Residential 13uilding. Plot No. 0260, in Survey No 37 situated at TNGOS Colony, Phase-ll Gopanpally (V), Serilingampally (lt,1l, llanga Reddy District, T.S Counsel for the' Freti:ioner: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the, Rer; oondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the, Fle:;:ondent Nos.2 TO 7: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR Counsel for the, Fler; rondent No.8: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDlf, SC FOR TGSPDCL GHMC The Court mad,3 th(l f,rllowing: ORDER l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PT'LLA KARTHIK 7 W.P.No.17251 of2o25 ORDER: . With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. 2 The writ petition is hled with the following prayer: "To issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of ttre respondents in not processing the application of the Petitioner to provide l l Domestic Connections total Domestic Contract Load of 55000 watts vide Reg No LTM25215OO88 connections to the petitioner in respect of the Residential Building PIot No 0260, in Survey No.37 situated at TNGOS Colony phase-ll, Gopanpally village, Serilingampally madal, Rarga Reddy District, Telangala State and not providing electricity connection to the above referred premises as illegal and arbitrary''.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energr for respondent No. 1, Sii N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos.2 to 7 arrd Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.8 and perused the record. ) )

4. Learned counsel states that the subject matter of this Writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.9792 of 2O23 dated 17.4.2023 and requested this Court to pass similar order in t ( ) 2 _-"_,..,r1 the present \ ri: Ixrr.ition also. The same is not seriottsly distr uted by the learned Govct ntr r: I I Pleader as well as learned Stancling Cou nsel for the respondents. In vier,'"' r:f -1t: above submissions and for the :eascns alike in the 5. order of this C cu -r rn W.P.No.9792 of 2023 daLed l1''+ 2Ot'3, this writ petition is dispos<:rl of directing the respondents to cousider thr) application of the PetitioDe r cated 16.6.2025 for providing 11 Domestitr ',lonnections tota-i Domestir: Contract Load of 55000 watts vide Re61 N': I,T}1252150O88 connections to tl1e petitioner in respect of the Residential Blrilding Plot No 026O, in Survt'l' l'tro.37 situated at TNGOS Colony I'hase II' Gopanpally village, Serilinga:-r pally madal, Ranga Reddy District, Ielangarta State and pass approp -iat, r>rders, in accordance with law, as expt'ditiously as possible,preleral.,lywithinaperiodoftwoweeksfromthedateofreceiptof a copy of this rI t1::, subject to the petitioner making necessirry payment' as stipulated u n<[,: - the trlectricity Act, 20o3. Miscellane,rus rlpplications, if aly, pending I n I his writ petition stand closed Th':re :;hal' be no order as to costs. To I

1. The PrittctPa't Hvderabad S 2. The Ch rirnla Distribution ! 3. The Chre" (ie HYdera':erd 4. The SuPe'rirtt ComPanS' [- r 5. The Di'risic tl; District 6. The Assi;t: r Ranga Rerld 7. The Assistztr Districl. //TRUE COPY' S D/..MOHD. ISMAIL i'r ReclsrRnn D6,'\lPU 'SECTION OFFICER I Secretary Power and EnergY DePartm t Secretariat, ;tate of Telang ana -500022 1-cum-Managing Director, Telangana S;tate Soul:hern Power Hyderabad om pany Limited, Vidy uth Soudha, Sonrajig uda, SPDC L, neral [Vlanager comm ercial Mint ComPoun dTG ,+ I i,.EilYE!lt3":,',nx€lhin:i1l%;E!,+i+i:'.,"1'.""," Lt Divisional Engineer, Operation Gachi5owli' T O S P DC L' I Bi"Jt,l"J", operation Gachibowli, TGSPD(I L' :lansa Reddv Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District. B. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, 9. One CC to SIVT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate IOPUCI '1 0. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 'l 1. One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL [OPUC] 12.One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] '1 3. Two CD Copies PSK GJP *t k HIGH COLIRI' DATED:23106t2025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.1725'1 ot 2025 (_) (.!l ,J,: ) ) ,FE oR Ti r(. 2 6 ,.ilJ ziift t! :i i 'tt :/i ).a \..- ., ,| -1 t I I t I DISPOSING ()F THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CoSTS 6 e[lolaE

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments