MOGILI ANAVENI SRI v. RAMCHANDER GOUD The Court made the following

Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Telangana State. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Telangana, District. The Assistant Commissioner of Poiice, Rajenciernagar, Cyberabad, Telangana State. The Station House Officer, P.S,Narsingi, Cyberabad, Telangana State. The Sub-lnspector of Police, P.S.Narsingi, Cyberabad, Telangana A.Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Raji Reddy, Occ.: Business, R/o.: Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Rangareddy District. A.Ram Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy, Occ.: Business, Rl/o.: PIot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar [t4andal, Rangareddy District. A. Bharthi, W/o. Late Sri.A.Bharath Reddy. Occ.: Housewife, Rl/o.: Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Rangareddy District.

10. Dr.R.Archana, W/o. R,Narsimha Reddy, Occ.: ltledical Practioner, Fl/o. 8-305, Akash Deep, NearVersova Telephone Exchange, 4-Bunglow, MHADA, Andheri, Mumbai 400052. '1 1.A.Aswin Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy, Occ : Business, R/o.: Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar [t4andal, Rangareddy District. .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.2 to 6 not to extend Police Aid or Assistance in respect of the land of the Petitioners admeasuring Acres 1 .1 0 guntas situated in Survey no.'19/Part @ 19/A @ 19/AA @ 1912 of Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, R.R. District in the absence of any Order of the Court granting such Police Protection for implementation of Order of lnjunction in C.M.A.No.66 of 2012 passed by the Learned ll Additional District and Sessions Judge, L.B.Nagar, R.R. District reversing the Judgment and Decree in l.A.No.'1406 of 20.10 in O.S.No.1402 of 2010 on the file of the Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, At L.B.Nagar, R.R. District, pending C.R.P.No.517 of 2013. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(VWMP. NO : 3563 OF 2016) Between:

1. A.Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Rali Reddy, Occ.: Business, Rl/o.. Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Rangareddy District.

2. A.Ram Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy, Occ.: Business, R/o.: Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar I\,4andal, Rangareddy District. 3. A. Bharthi. W/o. Late Sri.A.Bharath Reddy, Occ.: Housewife, R:/o.. Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Rangareddy Drstrict.

4. Dr.R.Archana. W/o. R.Narsimha Reddy, Occ.: Medical Practioner, R/o. 8-305, Akash Deep, Near Versova Telephone Exchange, 4-Bunglow, MHADA, Andheri, Mumbai 400052.

5. A.Aswin Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy, Occ.: Business, R/o.: Plot No.9, Kapil Nagar Colony, Hydershakote Village. Rajendernagar Mancjal, Rangareddy District. ... Petitioners/ Respondent Nos. 7 to 11 AND 1 2 B Ravi Yadav. S/o.. Late Kistaiah, aged about 43 years, Occ.: Employee, R/o.. H. No.9-1-331F 121 , Laxminagar, Langer house, Hyderabad. [,/d.Abdul Zakir, S/o.: It4d. Abdul Qayyum, Occ.: Business, Rl/o. H.No.10-3- 66/ 13. Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. ... Writ Petitioners/ Respondents Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

3. The State of Telangana, represented by its Secretary, Home Department, 4. The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Telangana State. 5. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Telangana, District. 6. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rajendernagar. Cyberabad, Telangana State.

7. The Station House Officer, P.S.Narsingi, Cyberabad, Telangana State. 8. The Sub-lnspector of Police, P.S.Narsingi, Cyberabad, Telangana ... Respondents/ Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 15-06-2016 passed in W.P.NO. 18567 of 2016 and dismiss the writ petition with exemplary costs in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 22803 OF 2016\ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 6 not to extend Police Aid or Assistance in respect of the land of the Petitioner admeasuring Acres 1.10 guntas situated in Survey no. 19/Part @ 19/A @ 19/AA @ '19/2 of Hydershakote Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, R.R. District and thereby interfere with the peaceiul possession of the Petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. SAHITH G. V, Representing Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 7 to 11:. MOGILI ANAVENI SRI V. RAMCHANDER GOUD The Court made the following: ORDER TIfE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITIoN No.18567 OF 2016 ORDER: \ 'Ihis \X/rit Petition is filed r.rnder Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to issue an_ appropriate Writ, order or direction more panicularly one in the namre of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.2 to 6 not to extend Police Aid or Assistance in respect of the land of the Petitionen admeasudng Acres 1.10 gunus situated in Suwey no.l9/Pan or 19/ A or 19/ AA or 19,/2 of Hydenhakote Village, Ra.iendemagar lv4andal, RR District in the absence of anv Order of the Coun gmnting such Police Protection for implementation of Order of Injuncdon in ClvLANo.66 of 20i2 passed by the Leamed II Additional District and Sessions Judge, L.B.Nagar, RR District revesing the Judgement and Decree in I.AN0.1406 of 2010 in 0.S.No.1402 of 2010 on the file of rhe lramed Principal Senior Cvil Judge, Ar L.B.Nagar, RR Districg pending CRP.No.51l of 201.3.... ;'

2. 'ff4ren the matter is taken up for hearing, lv{r.Sahith G-V, leamed counsel representing Mr.V.Ramchander Goud, leamed counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ Petition u,ith a liberry to file appropriate application, if at all the petitionen makes out any case.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, rights of the petitioners are reseryed to approach the ) appropdarc authoritv and initiate proper proceedings, if he wants to pursue the cause and if he is advised so. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY' S - P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER CA [oPUC] To, 1 2 3 One CC to SRI- V RAIVCHANDER GOUD, Ad . One CC to SRI IvlOGlLl ANAVENI, Advocate [O Two CCs to GP FOR HOME (TG), High Court for the State of Telangana

4. Two CD Copies MI!17 <d- I HIGH COURT DATED:0910912025 ORDER WP.No.18567 of 2016 r o -) * HE S14 ? J irB ?fl)r ). +( * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ( A dA )j \