High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the Respondents to consider and grant of Pattas to Petitioners in respect of lands each 1.00 acre, 1,00 acre and 1 .00 acre situated in Survey No, 1g0/6, 180127 and 180/1 9 respectively of Yenkepally Village of Moinabad Mandal, Rangareddy District without reference to Report No. D/Moinabad/TM-33-No 2SOOOO772 and (33) dated -04-2025 (signed on 28-04-2025 and 29-04-2025) of the 3rd and 4th Respondents pertaining to TM-33 Applications ln the interest of justice duly holding the action of the Respondents in not considering grant of pattas and related pattadar passbooks to Petitioners in respect of above mentioned lands as being arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and in violation ofjArticte 14 of Constitution of lndia. 'i- lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ma,z be pleased to direct the Respondents to maintain status quo in respect of lands admeasuring each 1.00 acre, 1.00 acre and 1.00 acre situated in Survey Nc. 180/6, 1gOl2Z and 180/'19 respectively of Yenkepalty Village of tVoinabad lr/andal, Rangareddy District pending consideration of Petitioners request for grant of pattas. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.RAVICHANDRAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY ORDER WRIT PETITION No.16978 of 202S It is stated that the petitioners are cultivating the land admeasuring Ac. I .O0 guntas each in Sy. Nos. l8O I 6, IBO 127 and l8O I 19, respectively, situated at Yenkepally Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, for the past several years. It is further stated that the petitioners and their predecessors-in- interest are in possession ol rhe said land since more than six decades and enjoying the said property as absolute owners. It is further stated that the petitioners made an applications seeking for issuance of pattadar passbooks duly taking into consideration of their long possession to enjoy the absolute rights over the subject property and to receive various incentives sanctioned by the Government as investment subsidies for cultivation of the said land. It is further stated respondent No.4 had submitted a report No.D/ Moinabad/TM-33No.25OOOO772 and (33) dated oil.O4.2o25, stating that the subject lands are Government lands and therefore the petitioners' applications cannot be considered and accordingly rejected the same on 29 .O4.2025. The grievance of the petitioners is that now the respondents are I I l \--1 CVBR, J \Yp_16978 2025 - taking steps to allot the lands in Sy. No. l gO to some private entities for extraneous considerations_ Hence, this, writ petition. 2. Considered the submissions of thc learned c ounsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistan. (iovernment Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nrrs. I to 4 and u.ith their consent, this writ petition is being disprsed of at the admission stage.

3. Learned Assistarrt Government pleader fbr Revenue, placing reliance on the report of respondent No.z uide report No.D/Moinabad/TM_33No.2SOOOO772 and (33) dated nil.O4.2O2S, has submitted that the nature ot the lands in Sy.No. 180 to an extent of Acs.99.14 guntas recorried from the Khasra Pahani onwards i.e. 1954_55 as Sarkari land and the said entries are continuing even from the latcst Bhu Bharati Portal prepared under the provisions of the Te zrng:rna Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2O2S (for short "the Act 7 of 2025"). 4 It is not out of place to mention that to know the nature of land_s .and its classification and interest of the land frame I Hl.derabad owners/ tenant the State Government has Land Revenue Regulations, I35g Fasli and prepared final CVBR T Wp_t 6q7S 2025 records called as Khasra pahani in the year ]9S4-SS. A careful examination of Khasra pahani, which is considered to be as title document, the nature of the subject land har rd,q rlas been classified as sarkari and the said ent.;-- ^_-"" are continuing even for latest Bhu Bharati Port2t rn2ip1':::'t" arned under the provisions of the Act I of 2025. In view of the classification of the land as Government Iand and even al no Frolnt of time the name of the petitioners or their predecessors have been recorded as Ia this writ petition is dev dismissed. reliel in this writ petidon' Therefore, ,oid of merits and the same is liable to be

5. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed. However, if the pedtioners are having any evidence that drey are in long possession of the property and they have perfected their title by way of adverse possession, they are at liberty to approach the competent civii Court lo agitate thcir grievances. 6. As a sequel, the nriscellaneous petitions pending, shall stand closed. No cosrs. if any, //TRUE COPY// To 1 2 2 One CC to SRI V.RAVICHANDRAN, Advocate [OPU Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the S Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copi SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR ION OFFICER tate of Telangana, at PSK. GJP w. ; .i,.1r*re-:;4iir... J '. i-,- . ,.. -- .i HIGH COURT DATED:2010612025 ) ORDER WP.No.I6978 of 2O2S IrtE -'i f4r€ 16 ((\,( O1JIJL T6 I ) I t l) I',IT CY ,EO DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?t + L\ I