Smt S Nagamani v. 'l . The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Revenue Divisional Officer' Rajendra Nagar Division, Ranga Reddy District, 3rd Respondent herein in not disposing off the online applications filed by the petitioner herein through Bhu Bharathi portal bearing application number CI2500015504, dated 08-05-2025 in respect of the agriculture land admeasuring Ac 0.20 guntas in survey numbers 148/AA8, situated at Vatinagullapaly village, Gandipet Mandal' (erstwhile Rajendra Nagar Mandal) Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, improper and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, 3rd Respondent herein to I x,},1.ii* unblock/remove the aqriculture land admeasuring Ac 0.20 guntas in survey numbers 148/AA8, situated at Vatinagullapaly village, Gandipet Mandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nagar Mandal) Ranga Reddy District from the list of blocked lands and to allow f rrther transactions in the interest of justice. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Revenue Divisronal Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, Ranga Reddy District 3rd Respondent herein to dispose of the online application filed by the petitioner herein through Bhu Bharathi Portal bearing application number C12500015504, dated 08-05-2025 in respect of the agriculture lands admeasuring Ac 0.20 guntas in survey numbers 148/AA8, situated at Vatinagullapaly village, Gandipet Mandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nagar Mandal) Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER ! r -.rr:-.i,.- ^ I HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No'16942 of 2O25 ORDER: The Writ Petition is Iiled seeking the following relief: "...pleased to issue a writ' order or direction' more particularly one in the nature of a writ of -andar.tus declaring the inaction of. the Revenue nit i"iorrl Officer, Rajendra Nagal Division'. Ranga Reddy District, 3'd Respondent herein in not drsposmg off the ontine appiications hled by the petitioner herein if,.o,rgi, Bhu bharathi portal !"illg. application ""-u?t CI2Sooo 15504, daGd 08-05-2025 in respect of itt. ag.i.utture land admeasuring Ac'O'2O guntas 1n .r*.f .trr-U.rs 148/AA8, situated. at -Vatinagullapaly Nagar Vlif"gl, Crr-taipet Mandal, (erstwhile ,-Rajendra ftf".iif , Ranga Reddy District as illegal'^ arbitrary' i*p.op". urrJ i., vioiation of Article 3O0A of the Coil"titrrtio., of India and consequently direct the R...".,rl" Divisional Offrcer, Rajendra Nagar Division' 3'd Respondent herein to unblock/remove the agricuiture Ac 0'20 guntas in survey numbers iu.,i "a-"."rring i +s 7 AAs, situatel at Vatinagullapafy 1il-lage.' .Gandipet IvIandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nugq YTdl) Ranga B.aJV 61",.i"t from the list of blocked lands and to a.llow further transactions in the interest of justice and pass..."

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the ission stage. "d1 2 { It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and 3. possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Ac' O'2O guntas in Survey No' 148/AA8(148 part)' situated at Vatinagullapally Village, Gandipet Mandal (erstwhile Rajendranagar Mandal), Ranga Reddy District' having purchased the same through a registered sale deed vide Document No' 13243 of 2O06' dated 21'O6'2006' It is further stated that the propert5r purchased by the petitioner was included in the list of prohibited properties on the ground that a court case is pending overthelandinSurveyNo'148/AA8'situatedat Vatinagullapally Village' Gandipet Mandal' 4. karned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the casQs instituted over ttre subject property, i'e', W'P' No' 21643 of 2022 and other cases, have ended in dismissal' Therefore' the petitioner is entitled to seek deletion of the property fromthelistofprohibitedpropertiestoenjoyabsolute rights over the ProPertY ' -/l 3

5. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents has not disputed that the petitioner purchased the property under registered sa-le deeds, and that the petitioner's narne was recorded in the title deeds under Katha No. 990 and pattadar passbooks were issued.

6. In view of the above, as there a-re no cases pending as on date for listing the subject property in the list of prohibited properties, the respondents may I be directed to examine the application submitted by the petitioner for deletion of the property.

7. Learned Government Pleader further submitted \ that the State Government has the power to de-notify the lalds from the list of prohibited properties under Section 22-A(4) of the Registration Act. B. In view of the above provision, the petitioner is permitted to make an appropriate application for deletion of the property from the list of prohibited properties. On such application being submitted by the b t petitioner, the respondents shall consider the same in \ accordance \vith the provisions of the Registration Act and the rules made thereunder, and if the petitioner's application satisfies all the requirements, respondents are directed to de-notify the property from the list of prohibited properties within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9. With the above directions, the writ petition IS disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, miscellaleous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. oeptDt'i%o#Dc'S-Hk /,TRUE COPY" A, SECTION OFFICER Department, Secretariat Buildings' state of ,o , The principal Secretary, ,Revenue ill*'*nl,,+l:linlt#**tt*ilq*Ei,}11+T;::::::* ^ BI1"SI,.S I8I'i3*O^ REDDY KANATHALA' AdVOCAIC TOPUCI

7. r*o CD CoPies SA BS i t \ t) o o \ .;HE SI416 c( 2E J ut{ zlE )i a A D .-:-c: t,^ T C qeO I II HIGH COURT DATED:1910612025 ORDER WP.No.16942 o1t 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. @ tu r*.* 1f'