High Court · 2025

PetitionUnderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction' more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Revenue Divisional Office ' Rajendra Nagar Division, Ranga Reddy District' 3rd Respondent herein in not disposing off the online applications filed by the petitioner herein through Bhu Bharathi portal bearing application number C12500015494' dated 08-05-2025 in respect of the agriculture land admeasuring Ac 100 guntas in survey numbers 148/AA5. situated at Vatinaguilapary viilage, Gandipet tvlandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nagar Mandal) Ranga Reddy District as illegal' arbitrary' improper and inViolationofArticle300AoftheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlydirectthe Revenue Divisional Officer' Ra.iendra Nagar Division' 3rd Respondent herein to unblock/remove th.e agriculture land admeasuring Ac 1.00 guntas in survey numbers '148lAA5, situated at Vatinagullapaly village, Gandipet Mandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nagar lVlandal) Ranga Reddy District from the list of blocked lands and to allow further transactions in the interest of justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, Ranga Reddy District 3rd Respondent herein to dispose of the online application filed b the petitioner herein through Bhu Bharathi Portal bearing application number 02500015494, dated 08-05-2025 in respect of the agriculture lands admeasuring Ac 1 .00 guntas in survey numbers 'l4BIAA5, situated at Vatina2ullapaly village, Gandipet Mandal, tentsvhile Rajendra Nagar Mandal) Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 16943 of 2o25 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: "...pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ o[ mandamus declaring the inaction of the Revenue Divisional Oflicer, Rajendra Nagar Division, Rar-rga Reddy District, 3.d Respondent herein in not disposing off the online applications filed by the petitioner hereir-r through Bhu Bharathi portal bearing application number CI25OOOI5494, dated 08-05-2025 in respect of the agriculture land admeasuring Ac. 1.00 guntas in survey numbers 148/AA5, situated at Vatinagullapal), Village, Gandipet Mandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nag:r Ma:rda1), Ranga Reddy District as i1lega1, arbitrary, improper and in violation of Article 3OOA of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct t]re Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, 3.a Respondent herein to unblock/remove the agriculture Iald admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas in survey numbers 148/AA5, situated at Vatinaguliapaly village, Gandiper Mandal, (erstwhile Rajendra Nagar Mandal) Ranga Reddy District from the list of blocked lzurds ald to allow further trarsactions in the interest ofjustice alld pass..."

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage. 2

3. It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 1.00 guntas in Survey No. 148/AA5 (148 part), situated at Vatinagullapally Village, Gandipet Mandal (erstwhile Rajendranagar Mandal), Ralga Reddy District, having purchased the same through a registered sale deed vide Document No. 13246 of 20O6, dated 21.06.2006. It is further stated that the property purchased by the petitioner rvas included in the list of prohibited properties on the ground that a court case is pending over the land in Survey No. 148/AA5, situated at Vatinagullapally Village, Gandipet Mandal.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the cases instituted over the subject property, i.e., W.P. No. 21643 of 2022 and other cases, have ended in dismissal. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to seek deletion of the propert5r from the list of prohibited properties to enj oy absolute rights over the properqr. J

5. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents has not disputed that the petitioner purchased the proper[r under registered sale deeds, and that the petitioner,s narne was recorded in the title deeds under Katha No. 986 and pattadar passbooks were issued.

6. In view of the above, as there are no cases pending as on date for listing the subject property in the list of prohibited properties, the respondents may be directed to examine the application submitted by the petitioner for deletion of the property. 7 . Learned Government Pleader further submitted that the State Government has the power to de-notify the lands from the list of prohibited properties under Section 22-A(4) of the Registration Act.

8. In view of the above provision, the petitioner is permitted to make an appropriate application for deletion of the property from the list of prohibited properties. On such application being submitted by the I .-I petitioner, i-he respondents shall consider the same in accordance 'n,ith the provisions of the Registration Act and the rules made thereunder, and if the petitioner's application satisfies all the requirements, respondents are directe<l to de-notify the property from the list of prohibited properties within a period of three (3) months frorn the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9. With the above directions, the writ petition 1S disposed of No Costs. Consequently, misceilaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. coPY" ,="t?i%o*?od'Stik 'TTRUE Ytt'"'* Department Secretariat Buildings' state of 'EcrloN ,o , The principar secretary, .Revenue l r[#* ut,**ser+,**n'*mfu ili{{',}siryr ;::: : :' . g'.l"tttS tt8''iAno* REDDY KANATHALA' Advocate toPUCl 7. Two CD CoPtes SA 4,P BS " o( o u \ Yg .,ii STa r6 2E J UN il6 t It z a oEson] Cs * HIGH COURT DATED:19106t2025 ORDER WP.No.16943r of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. za\ aa) 26