Gunturu Subba Suryanarayana Raju v. The State of A.P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the memo of grounds filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated 9-9-2002 made in Crl.M.P.No. 5473 of 2002 and order dt. 24-10-2006, 5-12-2006 & 24-01-2007 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri C. Praveen Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent, the Court made the following;
ORDER:
“Four weeks further time is granted for compliance of the order dated: 05-12-2006. List after four weeks i.e., on 07-03-2007.” Sd/- K.DAULAT KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam.
The VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
The Superintendent of Police Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam
The Station House Officer, V Town Traffic Police Station, Visakhapatnam 6. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT).
One CC to Sri C. Praveen Kumar, Advocate(OPUC).
One spare copy. AB HIGH COURT BN.J DATE: 07-02-2007. ORDER: CRL.R.C. No. 1247 OF 2002. DIRECTION
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.