Baikadi Gangaiah v. Department. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the u,rit petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of Respondents 2 to 5 in not taking any action on the illegal encroachments of the Respondent No.6 in spite of receiving the representation dated 20-05-2025 and 13-6-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to take appropriate action on the illegal encroachments of the 6th Respondent forthwith .7 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct Respondents 2 to 5 to consider the representation dated 20-os-202s and 13-6-2025 to initiate appropriate actron against the illegal encroachments of the 6th Respondent forthwith pending drsposal of Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. GANAGANI PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3to5: SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY, SC Counsel for the Respondent No_6:- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No. L6A7S OF 2025
ORDER:
Operative part
In this writ petition, the petitioner 1S seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 5lo take action against the illegal encroachment made by respondent No.6. The petitioner claims to have made representations dated 20.05.2025 and 13.06.2025 arrd his grievance is that respondent Nos.2 to 5 have not taken any action on them. { ( Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6 seeks time to hle detailed counter affidavit in this matter However, from the photographs h-led at page Nos.50 and 5 1 of the writ petition, it appears that there is a pathway between the properties and respondent No.6 has erected a structure attached to his house with plastic sheets and it appears to be an encroachment. Therefore, respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to issue notice to responder{ No.6 and thereafter consider the explalation, if any, submitted by respondent No.6 and tal<e action in accordance with law for removal of the encroachment, if 2 any. The entire exercise shall be completed u'ithin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order Accordingly, the u,rit petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stald closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG GISTRAR ASSISTANT t RE t'v ON 50200'1 T. S.. Hvdera bad Sanoareddv- District. Pincod e-5O2246 '
The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Ra.i Department' Secretariat Buildings' z. int'o.i.ii"i6-oitector, Sanoareddy District at sangareddy. Pincode-502001 5. iii; -d;i;i;i F;;;h;r;aorii";i ting""dov Distri;t at SJngareddv Pincode- a. ii-""fttinOal Parishad Develo pment Officer, Jharasanga m- Mandal' 5. ifi ;iir"r;"tL";;; G;;; #;havat, J harasansam- Ma ndal sangareddv- - oill*i. Anco"de-502246 Rep. bvits Panchayat S.ecfqtgry-- o. 5'i.jc'c'td 5ni cAruAcnNi PF{AKASH, Advocate-[oPUC] i. o;; cc io snt. K. PRADEEP REDDY. sq .tgiu^ct 8 Two ccs to Gp FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL OEV Higr' court for the - 9. Two CD CoPies State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] o BM TKS ( HIGH COURT DATED:2610612025 't rrlE S14 /(s ..i. 3 0 JUt ilut \1",,. :'r'^. , i-_pi -. -t c ( / ORDER WP.No.16875 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the u,rit petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.