The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, through SHO, P.S Fet Basheerabad, Hyderabad. 2. Devulapally Pallavi, D/o. Devulapally Ram Mohan, Age 25 years, Occ. Private Job, R/o.Flat no 403,our homes apartments,Gangasthan Dhulapally,Medchal- Malkajgiri District,TG. ...Respondent No.1/Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against petitioners/Accused no 1to 5 in FIR No. 757 of 2025 Dated 0110512025 of P.S.Pet-Basheerabad on the file of the IX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Cyberabad, at Medchal, registered U/Sec.85 BNS 3,4 DPA., by compounding the offences in terms of com prom ise. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings against petitioners/ Accused No 1 to 5 in Crime. No.757 0f 2025 0n the file of the lx Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Cyberabad At Medchal. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Devulapally Pallavi, D/o. Devulapally Ram Mohan, Age 25-years, Occ. Private Job, R/b.Flat no 403,our homes Apdrtments,Gangasthan Dhulapally,Medchal- Malkajgiri District.TG. ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant in lA.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 AND

1. Sannapuri Vamshi Kumar, S/p. Sannapuri Dasharatham. Age.29 years. Occ. Privatd Employee, R/o. H.no 3-1'18/6 Gouraram (V), Wargal (lvl), Siddipet District.

2. Sannapuri Venkatalaxm'i, W/o. Sannapuri Dasharatham, 4gg House wife, R/o. H.no 3-118i6 Gouraram (V), Wargal (M), Siddipet District. 3. Sannapuri Dasharatham, S/o. Sannapuri Yadagiri, Ag9, 65 years, Occ. Agricuiture, R/o. H.no 3-1 18/6 Gouraram (V), Wargal (M), Siddipet District. 4. Ankam Shobha, Wo. Ankam Bal Raj, Age. 43 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. q7 y_e.aq' Occ '12-5-58/3,Sai vidya Nagar,Siddipet, Siddipet District..

5. Sannapuri Geetha, D/o Sannapuri Dasharatham, Age 41 years, Occ House wife, R/o. H.no 3-1 18/6 Gouraram (V), Wargal (M), Siddipet District. ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 5 in lA.Nos.3 & 4 ot 2025

6. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, High Court, Hyderabad, through SHO, P.S Pet Basheerabad, Hyderabad ..Respondent No.1/Complainant in lA.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359 (6) BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and Respondent No.2Alictim to compound the offences in Crime. No.757 of 2025 Dated 01-05-2025 of P.S.Pet-Basheerabad on the file of . the lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Cyberabad, at Medchal, registered U/Sec.85 BNS 3,4 DPA, in the interest of Justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 ' Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise by quashing the proceedings against the petitioners/Accused in Crime No.757 ot 2025 Dated 01-05-2025 of p.S. Pet-Basheerabad on the file of the lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Cyberabad, at Medchal, registered U1Sec.85 BNS 3,4 DpA. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Rekula Tarun Kumar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri G.Sai Soursh Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI I.A.N os.3 AND 4 oF 2025 ln/And CRIMIN AL PETI TION No.75 330F 2025 COMMON ORDER This criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya NagarikSurakshaSanhita,2023(forshort'BNSS'2023')seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 5 in crime No.757 0f 2025 0n the file of the Petbasheerabad Police Station, Cyberabad District.

2.ThepetitionersarearrayedasaccusedNos.lto5intheCrime case registered for the offence punishable under section 85 of Bharthiya Nyaya Sanhitha,2023 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

3. Heard Mr.R.Tarun Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and tt/r.G.Sai Sourish Rao, learned counsel for the respondent No.2lde-facto com plaina nt

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2/de-facfo complainant filed l'A'Nog3* and 4 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise 2 ATTRJ IA.Not.) and 4 of 2025 tuf and Crl.P.No.7513 of 2025 and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.757 o'f 2025.

5. This Court vide orde'r dated 20.06.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 26.06.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenvcom prom ise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record.

7. Having considered the allegations, the charged offences, which are essentially matrimonial and inter-personal in nature and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace among them, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and anothe/ and Anit Mishra v. State of lt.P-z; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the ' 2012 (1o) scc 303 'z 2024 INSC 189 3 zors is; scc eae 3 A'IR,/ IA.Not.) and 4 of 2025 it/ and Cr/.P.N0.75)) of 2025 considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.l52B o'f BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice B. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, all the proceedings in Crime No.757 of 2025 on the file of the Petbasheerabad Police Station, Cyberabad District, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 5. o ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- N. SRIHARI DEPUW REGISTRAR sEcr&L-;rcER I r!"'" x Additionar Judiciar Frrst crass Magistrate cyberabad at Medchar. 2. The Station House Officer, petbasheerib"ad Fof i# St"tion, Cy6;;;ffi. 3 Two ccs to the pubric prosecutor, High siiiri ot'iJi"'nffi" 4 One CC to Sri Rekula Tarun Kumar.Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to Sri G Sai Soursh nao, navoiiie tOFUCt 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] -courti"iine "t o NVB/PSI- HIGH COURT DATED:0410712025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.7533 of 2025 STAr€ IuL t6 * * oespP$ DISPOSING OF THE CRLP AND ALLOWING THE lA.Nos.3&4OF2025 \1