The High Court · 2025

1. S.Nageshwar Rao, S/o Ramulu, aged 51 yrs' Field Worker' Urban tulalaria 2. S.Bixamaiah, S/o. Manikyam, aged 51 years'. Occ Field Worker' Oio Senior ' E"i#ljiJsi;'i, - u.6;; (l"ri,,i"'-scrt"#'"' Nalsonda' Nalqonda District' 3. Gundarapu Kotappa, S/o Veerabhadraiah' 58 years' Occ Field Worker' O/o' " 5;;i;'E;t;;idei"i, u,n"n-"n'r;iiii S"r'e'e''t'lulsonda' Nalsonda District' 4. T.Venkat Reddy, S/o. Satti Reddy, aged 49 years' Occ Field Worker' O/o' ' s.""i"i e"til""'r"gi;t, u''d;" i'iirjtii'sin"te' Nalgonda' Nalsonda District' 5. Tadoori Sridhar. S/o. Ramulu, aged 57 years' Field Worker' O/o Senior - ir'br; il;i;; -6;hfie,' Naigonda' Narsonda District' " iiiJ'i'JrJsi.i, 6. Karne Varaprasad, S/o. Lingaiah, aged 55 yrs'.Oc-c .Field " ilil;;;si5i, uiui^ r',rrr"iii sCnem"e, Nalsbnda' relansana state 7. B.Venkat Reddy, S/o. Anji Reddy, ?Sed 51 years' Occ Field Worker' O/o' ' 5;;;;'E;i;;;6biit, u..or'n r''iir,7i s6n"'"' Nalgonda' relansana state 8. P.Amarender Reddy, S/o Malla Reddy' aged-55 yrs',Occ Field Worker' O/o. " b."i"i iiit"r"orogiii,' uroi; M,r"iiiSin"ni"' Nal{onda' Telangana state' 9. Cherlaoalli Lingaswamy, S/o Seetaramulu' aged 4^8 years' Occ' Field Worker' " 5);;.'Di"tii"aMiwi, oriibe, Nalsonda, relansana State' Field Worker National Fileria 10. Jillela Anianeyulu, S/o. Veeraiah, aged. 50 .years. '" Uirii;,jr]i.s|.i,rlr.ltcpl"u".ii,"oio.urvrinoito, suryapet, relansana state. 11. Durmutla tvlaruthi Rao, S/o Pochaiah' age{ q8 years'- Field Worker' O/o ' Siiirii'rt,,t"oi"al ano ueattn officer, Suryapet' Telangana State Worker' O/o Senior Telangana State. ..4-' 7

12. Gudooru Prat Watchmarr, Pri State hap B.eddy, S/o. Balreddy, aged 55 y_ears, Occ. Night mary Heatth Center, V. T. Nagar, i.,talgonOa'OGtiict, l"Jangana

13. P.Latcharah. S/o. Raiaiah, .aged 5Z yrs. Night Watchman, primary Health Centre,,Jogod u. Nar rerar l,lii Jar. rrrartjonoj Biitri.i'" 14. Pakala Chennaiah, S/o Bata Narsimha, aqed 51 vears n6"ii[r, folia (F,P)- Unit, Dist Headquarrei Gl"t Telanoana State - Occ. Sweeper, pulse Nalgonda District,

15. Marnidi flami,u. Sio Narsimha, aged 5g years. Occ. Hetper, purse polia (pp) unir. Disr Headquarte. Govr Hos[itat. Nits;"d" tii;tii.:.i;i;n;;; idu,.-, 16.Naka-ek,rnte Venkatesham, S/o Sathaiah, aged 45 years, Occ. Sweeper, NF Canal Hrrsprtal [\,4iryalaguda, Nalgonda Oi"'tri.i, f"li"grrra State. 17.Pakal.a. \/enkataiah, S/o Lingaiah, qSgd 52 years, Occ. Field Worker, O/o. Dist t\,4edicat and Heatth Offi;er, yad;dri eh",igr,"biiri"t, fefrngun;6ia; " AND PETITIONERS 2 1 Sml. Chr stna Z.Chonothrr l{g..,prjn6ipal Secretary. Heatth lVledical and Fami y Wet'a.e (F 1) D6partment rerai1i3n3 !"c"r'e-#riai."iyoeraoao Dr B RavinderNayak,, Director of public Health and Family Welfare, Gove'nmel o' Telangana, Koti, Hyderabad Sri Sandeegt Kumar Sultania. l.A.S-., . principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Deoartment, Telangana Secretarijt. UVOeri'Ual' 3 4 5 isr nivas, District t\.4edicat and Heatth Officer, Natgonda, Tetangana 3[:8r,,, Sri P. Chandra Sekhar. District Ir,4edical and Health Officer, Suryapet, Telangan,t State. Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri. Gurram Srinivas Counsel for the Respondents : Assistant Government pleader for Services _t The Court made the following: ORDER .RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA CONT EMPT CASE No.L434 0 F 202s o RDER: Heard Sri Guram Srinivas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondents'

2. Complaining violation of the orders of this Court dated 26.03.2025 passed in W.P.No.786 of 2022, the present Contempt Case is filed. The re!evant porti on of the order of his Court 2A22 is

26.O3.202s passed in W.P.No.786 f t 3 extracted hereu nder: "The writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the request of the petitioners in counting the past services rendered by the petltioners in contingent establishment from the date of petitioners initial aplointment to till the date of regularization for commencement of qualifying service as per G'O Ms' No.156 Finance and Planning (FW. PEN'1) Department dated 29-04-1983 for the purpose of sanction of pensron by duly taking into consideration the fact as 'born" on record that similar relief had been extended to petitioners in W.P. No. 7343 cf 2O19 vide its order dated 24.11.2022 which had even been complied with vide Memo No. 2046l G/2O23, dated 17 'tO'2O24' issued in favour of the petitioners thereunder in W'P' B,@@ \-:ii-il-- '{, ::..i-:'' r, '.,.:; 2 SN,J C.C.No.1434 2025 No. l'343 of 2019, in accordance to law, within a period of four (4) weeks From the date of receipt of a copy of the order and take a decision on the subject issue and duly communicate the decision to the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs.,,

4. Learned Assistant Government pleader, appearing on behalf ot= the respondents, placing relianc€, on Memo No.B3B3/G/2025 dated 18.09.2025 issued by the Secretary to Government, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (G) Department in compliance to the directions oi this Court, dated 26.03.2025 passed in W.p.No.786 of 2O?.2, contends that the orders of this Court had been duly complied with, and the request of the petitioner had been duly considered, and detailed speaking orders had been passed rejecting the request of'the petitioner by assigning reasons.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the impugned order passed in pursuance to the orders oF this Court dated 26.03.2025 passed in W.p.No.786 of 2022 is in clear violation of the orders dated 26.03.2025 of this Court and therefore, the respondents are liable for contempt. 3 S N,J C.C.No.1434 2025 i I I I

6. This Court opines that merits of the proceedings dated 18.09.2025 vide memo No.83B3/G/2025 issued by the 1't respondent herein in compliance to the directions of this Court dated 26.03.2025 passed in W.P.No.786 of 2022 cannot be gone into under contempt jurisdiction'

7. Takin q into consi deratio n the sub missions made he learned counsel a Dea rr noonbe half of th e vernmen Ass lea r nd th titi ners Pleader for Serv ices-I a ooea rrnq on behalf of ondents and duly takinq into consideration the No. b W.P record that order vide me as borne 3A3/Gl 2025 dated 18.O9.2O 5 had een issu ed he 1tt r s ond nt her rn rn c m !ian ions of this Cou rt. dated 26.O3.2025 pass din .No.786 of 2O22, and dulv brino no the said orde r 2 on re cord, this Court oDines that there is no viol of the orders of this Co urt date 26.O3. 25 pa .P.No.786 ol 2022 and accord inolv, the Contemot ition ers to is closed qivino lib rtv to the D w Ca r ue he r medies as V ilable to etiti ners a inst th orde da

18.09.2 4 SN,J C.C.No.1434 2025 me mo No.8383/c/ 2025 issued bv the l"t resDon dent herein in comolia nce to the dire ions of this Cou rt dated 26.03.2 O25 oassed in W.P.No.7 86 ot 2O22. However, there sh all be no order as to io sts. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. To, ,TRUE COPY// Sd/- N. RAJAGOPAL D PUTY REGISTRAR S CTION OFFICER 1 2 3 Two CCs to the Assistant Government pleader for Servioes _1, State of Telangana, High Court Buitdings, at Hyderabad (OUT) - One CC to Sri. Gurram Srinivas, Advotate IOpU'Ct- ' Two CD Copies DL ,w. HIGH COURT DATED:19/09/2025 ORDER CC.No.1434 of 2025 CLOSING TTIE CONTEMPT CASE i\1 LD to(\ 1'rtE S t) () * 23CIET?ffi .c) * i4, a-:i'-