Shagufta Naaz v. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction one in the nature of fhe writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction holding that the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation dated 19lOGl2O23 filed by the Petitioner and not sanctioning new MEE-SEVA and not selecting the Petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District, is illegal, arbitrary, malicious, motivated, against the principles of natural justice and fair play, besides discrimination and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 of the constitution of lndia and may be pleased to direct the Respondents to sanction the MEE-SEVA and select the Petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK operator at ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District as per the Notification issued by the Respondent No.3. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section i s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to sanction the MEE-sEVA and to select the petitioner as MEE- SEVA KlosK operator at ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District as per the Notification issued by the Respondent No.3 during the pendency of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MD. AJMAL AHMED Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2: AGP FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Counsel for the Respondents No.3 & 4: AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the fr:llowing: ORDER ('-l I OR ER: HON'BLE MRS ]USTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT P TION No.17741 oF 2024 Heard Sri Md.Azmal Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Information Technology, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the tearned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 and 4.

2. The oeti oner aooroached he Court seekino Draver as u nder: "to pass an order or direction one in the nature of the writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction holding that the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation dated 10-06-2023 filed by the Petitioner and not sanctioning new MEE-SEVA and not selecting the Petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem, Asifabad District, is illegal, arbitrary, malicious, motivated, against the principles of natural justice and fair play, besides discrimination and violative of Articles t4, 19,21 of the Constitution of India and may be pleased to direct the Respondents to sanction the MEE-SEVA and select the 2 SN,J wP 17't4t 2024 Petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheern, Asifabad District as per the Notification issued by the Respondent No.3 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Kagaznagar, Komurambheem, Asifabad District and petitioner had applied for selection as a MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No.25. The petitioner submitted all the required documents, and passed the written examination with 27 marks. Despite being eligible, the selection of the petitioner had been ignored. The petitioner vide detailed representation dated t9.06.2023 addressed to the respondents herein, requested the respondents to sanction new MEE-SEVA KIOSK and to select the petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem, Asifabad District, however, no action had been initiated on the said representation as on date. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the writ petition could be disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2023 seeking sanction of new MEE-SEVA KIOSK and also to consider the J SN,J wP t7741 2024 request of the petitioner to select the petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No.25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem' Asifabad District, within a reasonable period'

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Information Technology appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos'1 and 2 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 does not dispute the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Takino into consideration: a) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Information Technology appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 and, b) The contents of the letter of the petitioner dated tg-06.2023 addressed to the respondents herein, I , I ' --:-- - 4 SN.J \\ry t'174t 2024 The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representat'on dated 19.O6.2c.23 lor sanction of new MEE-SEVA KIOSK and also the request of the petitioner for selection of the petitioner as MEE-SEVA KIOSK Operator at Ward No'25, Kagaznagar, Komuram Bheem, Asifabad District, in accordance to law, within a period of ten (1O) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and duly communicate the decision on the petitioner's representat'on 4ated 19.06.2023 to the petitioner herein. However, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed' SD/-MOHD. lsMAlL SISTANT REGISTRAR AS I i //TRUE COPY// . SE.CTION OFFICER To,

1. The PrinciPal Secretary lT and Secretariat, HYderabad'

2. The Dir6ctor Electronic Service' - HyAeriUaO, Secretariat, Hyderabad' 3. The District Collector and Chairman' at Asifabad. C Department, State of Telangana' Delivery (DESD), Telangana State, DeGS, Kumrambheem Asifabad District I

4.TheTahsildar,KagaznagarMandal,KumrambheemAsifabadDistrictat Kagaznagar.

5. One CC to SRI MD. AJMAL AHMED, Advocate [OPUCI 6.TwoCCstoGPforlnformationTechnology,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT]

8. Two CD Copies MP BS r \ / t HIGH COURT DATED:0710212025 ri1 E I 15: ( .) .) 21rtB zffi z a rIClr-'' ORDER I I WP.No.17'741 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I I \ \ \ /5 h 1 ,// At //