✦ High Court of India · 04 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Feb 2025

3. Mr. Unni Krishna @ Unni Raj (Died) S/o Ank lvlenon, - 4. Mr. Suresh, S/o.Late Unni Krishnan @ Unniraj, Aged about 57 years, Occ Driver, C/o St. George Grammer School, Abids, Hyderabad

5. JabezMuthyala S/o Sri Hari Charan, Age: 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o 1-1- 725151 4, Gandhinagar, Hyd-80 (Respondent No. 5 is impleaded as per Court Order Dt. 1711112021 ' vide lA No. '1 of 2021 in CCCA No. 190 ol 2017) ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS { _L LA. NO: 2 OF lEeAMP. No: 542 oF 20171 Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 R/w Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pr,:tition, the High court may be prleasied to pass an order of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, tlrr:ir agents, henchmen and all persons claiming thrr;ugh them from altering the na'.ure zrnd character of the petition schedule propert,/ /creating third party rig hts/intr:rest irr respect of the petition schedule property in Ep.No..1 1/2010 in OS.No.1101tiLt)o1 cn the file of court of lX Addi.Sr.Civil Judge lFTC), City Civil court, Hyderabrd, pr:-rding disposal of CCCA.No. /20'17 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2at_z()rlCAMP. NO: 541 OF 2017 Petition rnder Order 41 Rule 27 R/w Section 15i CpC praying that in the circumstances sitated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitron, the High court may be r eased to grant leave to the petitioner to file the documents as per the list anc recerive the same on record by way of additiona evidence and mark as Ex.P-'10 to f) 22 on behalf of the petitioner/Appellant in Cr:)CA.No. /2017 c:, 'i lA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under liection 148 R/w 1 5'1 cpc praying that n the circumstances stated in the af+ida'i: filed in support of the petrtron, the High Court may be pleased to exte nrj tlrer interim orders dated 22-09-2017 as exten ced on 14-11- 2017 and on 07 02-2018 in rA No. 5 of zo17 in cccA No 19( of 2oi7 untir further orders, p endirtr; disposal of CCCA No. 190 of 2017 . IA NO: 1 OF 20'1 I Petition l nder {lection 148 cpc prayrng that in the c rcumr;tances stated in the affidavit file,J ir support of the petition, the High Court may br: pleased may be pleased to t:xtenrJ the interim orders dt.22-0g-2017 as extenrled on 14-11- 2017 in cccAN4P l\o.54212017 in cccA No.190/20'17 untir i-rrrher orders, pending disposalof C:OCA No.190/201 7. I .--L I I I I I I i I j I I I :r", : lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Between:

1. Smt Sunanda Bhaskar Rao Wo ltrl.J.Bhaskara Rao aged about 79 years occ Retd.employee presently r/o Flat NO.303, Gharonda Apartments Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad Rep. by her duly constituted GPA holder, Respondent No.2 herein . 2- Mr. ItI. Hari Charan, s/o IV1.S.J. Prakash Rao Aged about 82 years, Occ Retd. Employee Rlo.H.No.1-1-7251A14, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana presently at Flat No. 204, Silver Springs Residency, House No. 41-1061111, Chandabagh, Moulali, Hyderabad- ... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS No. 1 & 2 AND '1 . C Janga Reddy, S/o C. Jagga Reddy, Aged about 74 years, Occ Agriculturist, R/o.H.No.6-2-290, Pinjarala, Hanamkonda, Warangal 2. Mr. Unni Krishna @ Unni Raj (Died) S/o Ank lt/enon, -

3. Mr. Suresh, S/o.Late Unni Krishnan @ Unniraj, Aged about 58 years, Occ Pvt. Service, R/o Hyderabad. (R3 not necessary party) ...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS . Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit {iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 22.O9.2O17 passed in CCCA.tt/P.No.542 of 2017 in CCCA.No. 190 of 2O17. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri J. Prabhakar Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 and 2: Sri Nyayapathi Prashant The Court made the following: ORDER .;rw, -:=r:r.ffir .:'.: 2l THE IIONC)URABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CITY (lltvll, COURT APPEAL No.190 of 2ttl7 ORDER: This appeal ir; filed by the appellant aggrieved by the orrler and decree dated I 0.08.20'l in E,.A No.12 of 2010 in E.P No. I I of 2010 in ( t.S No. I 101 of 2007 passed b1 the ,r:arned IX Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fl'C), City Civil Court, Hyderabacl.

2. Lealnetl counsel for the appellant reported that they u,cre not in contact with tht:il clients 3 . Rec ordirLg the submission of the leamed coun:;el for the appellant, the ()it1' (livil Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prost, cution. No order as to cost; As a seqrre l, nriscellaneous applications pending in this petition if any, shall stand clos :d. //TRUE COPYII Sd/. K. SFIINIVASA RAO JOIN-I- REGISTRAR r-. ' \ sEc*toN oFFtcER I The lX Arid tiorral Senior Civil Judge, (FTC) City Civil Court, H,rderabad (with records. i any) One CC tr llri ,.J Prabhakar, Advocate [OPUC] 9n" 99 tr llri rtJyayapathi Prashant, Advocate [OpUC] Two CD Or:cier; To, 2 3 4 VH L € HIGH COIJRT DATED: 04t0212025 ORDER CCCA.No.190 of 2017 J r E Sr4r ,.J 1 os. 'J c l.: \ tli Ilrl 2025 a -a \\--'-a::. I11 ^ r-rf:(' DISMISSING G,CCA FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT ISOSTS I- i o j I I i l l I I t : i I I I I I I I I I i ! i 't I I I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments