✦ High Court of India · 02 May 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 May 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 May 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,051 words

rosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Telangana.

2. Taqibaba, S/o Umarali, Age. 26 years, Private Employee OLX Office, R/o Nea '1-4-70, Hajikhanpet (Vill.), Narayanpet( RESPONDENT adhar No.236876506255, Occ Masjid Banda, Serlingampalli, H,No. ist.), Telangana-500092. ...DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of be pleased to call for the records pertain Crime no. 73012021 filed U/S. 279 and 33 Court, Kukatpally) and quash the same as il praying that in the circumstances riminal Petition, the High Court may g to C.C. in STC NO 41 9/2021 in of IPC on the file of Xll Addl MM egal, arbitrary; |A.NOS.1 &20F2021 BETWEEN: Taqibaba, S/o Umarali, Age. 26 years, Aa Employee OLX Office, R/o Near Masjid Hajikhanpet (Vill.), Narayanpet(Dist.), Telang har No.236876506255, Occ. Private anda, Serlingampalli, H,No. 1-4-70, na-500092 ...DEFACTO COMPLAINANT IN BOTH PETITIONS AND

1. Mr. Manas Pattnaik, S/o Prapulla Patn No.920428910098, Occ. lT Employee, Community, Nalagandla, Ranga Redd RESPON 2. The State of Telangana, Rep by Publi ik, Age. 41 years, Aadhar R/o. H.no 1901 Aparna Cyber (District), Telangana-50001 9. ENT/ACCUSED IN BOTH PETITIONS Prosecutor, High Cou(, Hyderabad, Telangana. RESPONDENT IN BOTH PETITIONS i: r!' { '--:iY$ r' l.A. NO: 1OF 2021 Petition under Section 320(5) of Cr.P C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/Defacto Complainant to compromise with the accused /'1st respondent in STC.No.41912021 in Crime No.73Ol2O21 UlS.279 and 336 l.P.C on the file of Xll AMM Court, Kukatpally; l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 320(2) ot Cr P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to compound the proceedings in STC.No.419/2021 in Cr.No.730/2021 filed U/S.279,336 IPC pending on the file of Xll AMM Court, Kukatpally; This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SMT RAKEE SRIDHARAN, Advocate for the Petitioner Sri ltrl.Vivekananda Reddy, Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and Smt B Ra.ieswari, Advocate appear for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUS CE K. SURENDER I.A.Nos.1 aad 2 t 2021 tn and CRIMINAL PETITION N .7209 of 2O2l COMMON ORDER: The present Criminal Petition s hled seeking to quash the proceedings pending against the petit ner/accused in S.T.C.No.419 of 2021 in Crime No.730 of 2O2l n the hle of the learned XII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Co t, Kukatpally, for the offences under Sections 279 and 336 of Indian nal Code

2. LA.Nos.l and 2 of 2O2l are flle by respondent No.2l de facto complainant seeking to compound e oflences punishable under Sections 279 and 336 of I.P.C. with w ich the petitioner/ accused was charged, and to record the compromis arrived between the parties at the intervention of the elders. 3" Both the parties were present n-person before the Court and they were identified by their respec ive counsel. A11 the parties in principle have agreed to compromise e matter.

4. In view of the same, I.A.Nos. 1 d 2 of 2021 are allowed and the Criminal Petition is allowed, and proceedings pending against 2 petitioner/ accused in S.T.C.No.419 of 2O2l on thc hle of the learned XII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Kukatpally, is quashed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sl-rall star-rd closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR \, /, SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 6 The Xll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Kukatpally at Prashanthnagar The Station House Officer, Gachibowli P.S., Cyberabad One CC to Smt RAKEE SRIDHARAN Advocate IOPUC] One CC to Smt B RAJESWARI Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hvderabad (OUT) Two CD Copies (Alongwith a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) VSM/gh HIGH COURT DATED:0210512025 1 == i. r ttE srap 6 (.) Y l, --l 13 IIJEM l' z D -' ,.') ORDER !A.NOS.1 &2oF2021 IN/AND CRLP.No.7209 of 2021 ALLOWING THE IA.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2021 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION v 4,1 < 2 /.7/K{ -WTt '* )r :: ,/4 ,/i .4* IN THE HIGII COURT.OF'JUDICATURE THE.STATE OE' TELANGAI{A 4.T'HY,DE , (MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION uls.4a2 oF cR.Pc.l CRL.P.No.rt2r? OF 2O2I IN C.C.STC.No.419 /2021 in Cime r.o. XII AMM Court , Kukatpally, Distric 30 l2o2l On the fi1e of :: Ransareddv <-/.;.1 BgIWDEN Mr. Manas Pattnark ,S/o Prapulla Patnaik, Age: 4lyears, Aadhar No.920428910098 Occ: lT employee R/o. H.no I 901 Aparrra Cybdr C Nalagandla, Ranga Reddy(District), Telaggana-50O t9 munity, 7 AND l The State of Telangana, Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Telangana.

2.Taqibaba S/o Umarali, Age:26 years, Aadhar No.23687 6506255 Occ: Private employee OLX Ofhce, R/o Near Masjid Bandl Serlingampalli H;no|-4-7O Hajikhanpet (vi11) Narayanpet(Dist) Tela nga na -500092 .. . Petiti6n-er./ Accused Respondent e-faclo Complainant JOINT ME orI ED BYTHE PETITIONER & DE ACTO OMPLAINANT May piease my lordship

1.lt is submitted that in view of the facts that complainant have settled their disputes rvith e respondent/defaclo petitioner and do not wish to prosecute the complaint any further, c ntinuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise futility and jus lhal the dispute between parries is ro put an e se curing the ends of justice being the ultimate be expedient to quash the subject cilarge sheet iding lactor it would ce in the case demands d and peace is restored; and consequent proceedings emanating there from. 2.lt is further contended rhat the par-ties sertled thcir dispute and paid compensation towards the injuries sustained. 3.lt is submitted that without pleading guilty for quashing of CC in STC No.a19/2O21 in cri 279 & 337 pending before the XIIAMM Court , may be quashed and render justice. Hence this Joint memo e petitioner's petition elo.73o/2O2\U/S ukalpally,R.R.District, e eti,Nro*' Place raql** lM|4-,, Counsel C"-d

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments