K.Subhadrajyothi v. The State of Telangana

ition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the nces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.'1 in non- disposing the Appeal No.013984, 01 .05.2025 which is passed by the Respondent No.2 in favour of the Respondent No.3 without issuing any notice and without giving the opportunity to contest the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unco n stitutiona I and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the XXll Junior Civil Judge Court at Hyderabad to stay of all proceedings in E.P.No.490 of 2022 which is filed against me and other Respondent Nos.4 to I and stop the salary attachment in the said E.P.No.490 o'f 2022 until disposal of the Appeal No.013984 which is pending before the Respondent No.1. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 4 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the XXll Junior Civil Judge Court at Hyderabad to stay of all proceedings in E.P.No.490 ol 2022 which is filed against me and other Respondent Nos.4 to I and stop the salary attachment in the said E.P.No.490 of 2022 until disposal of the Appeal No.0'1 3984 which is pending before the Respondent No.1. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: Ms. S.SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI KOPPULA GOPAL The Court made the following: ORDER Page 1of3 SK,I + THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.16724 of2025, ORDER: 1 This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.1 in not disposing of the Appeal No.O13984 filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the Award passed by the respondent No.2 in ARB OpNo.6g4 of 20ta.

2. Heard Sri Rapolu Bhasker, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the official respondents. 3 The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that aggrieved by the Award passed by the respondent No.2 in ARB OP No.684 of 2ota the petitioner frled Appeal before the respondent No.1 in Appeal No.O13984 on the gror-rnd that the respond.ent No.2 passed Award without issuing arry notice and \_li Pqge 2 of3 SK,I without giving opportunity to the petitioner to contest the case. Taking advantage ofthe exparte orders passed in ARB Case No.684 of 2024, the respondent No.3 filed E.P.No.49O of 2022 against the petitioner and others on the file of XXII Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad for attachment of the propefties of the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 to 9 and the petitioner came to know about the same when the Bailiff of the Court tried to attach the properties of the petitioner. Immediately, the petitioner filed appeal before the respondent No.1 on O1.O5.2O25, but the respondent No.1 is not disposing of the appeal, due to which the respondent No.3 is trying to attach the salary of the petitioner by filing E.P and sought a direction to the respondent No.1 to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner. 4 Ms.S.Sravatnhi, learned Assistant Governrnent Pleader for Stamps and Registration would submit that the respondent No.l will dispose of the appeal filed by Page 3 of3 SK,] the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and requested to pass appropriate orders.

5. After hearing both sides, without going into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.1 is dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner vide Appeal No.O13984, as per law, within three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No order as to cbsts.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/-S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR v SECTION OFFICER o,T 1 The Principaf secretary, Revenue (Registration - r) Department, secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State 6fietinganj. The Deputy Registrar of Chits / Arbitrator, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana. - [\4anagei-, [\4/s. Sun-rai: Chit Fund pvt. Ltd, Abids 2 3. The Foi'eman/Br.anch Branch, Hyderabad. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCl One CC to SRI KOPPULA GOPAL, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to GP FOR STAI\4I,p_q REG|STRAT|ON, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies 4 t o 7 BSR GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1 710712025 ORDER WP.No.16724 of 2025 (_i, ? 5 JUL 2O& * t) PATerl DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS D J b